Connecticut Senate Bill SB00119

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/21
• Refer: 1/12/21
• Refer: 3/4/21
• Report Pass: 3/18/21
• Refer: 3/29/21
• Report Pass: 4/6/21
• Refer: 4/28/21

Caption

An Act Exempting Volunteer Fire Companies And Departments And Volunteer Ambulance Services And Companies From The Fee For A Criminal History Records Check.

Impact

The passage of SB00119 is expected to lead to an increase in volunteer participation within fire departments and ambulance services across the state. This could enhance the capacity of these organizations to respond to emergencies and provide critical services, particularly in communities that rely heavily on volunteers. Additionally, by lowering the costs associated with background checks, the bill could streamline the onboarding process for new volunteers, making it easier for community members to become involved.

Summary

SB00119 aims to exempt volunteer fire companies and departments, as well as volunteer ambulance services and companies, from the fee associated with criminal history records checks. The bill was introduced with a focus on supporting volunteer organizations that contribute significantly to public safety, particularly in underserved areas where these services are critical. By removing this financial barrier, the legislation seeks to encourage more volunteers to serve in essential emergency response roles.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00119 appears to be positive, with broad support expressed for initiatives that bolster volunteerism in emergency services. Legislators and community advocates highlighted the importance of volunteers in sustaining local emergency response capabilities, particularly amidst growing demands. There does not seem to be significant opposition to the bill, indicating a general consensus on its benefits.

Contention

While the bill was primarily well-received, some concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of background checks in ensuring the safety and security of vulnerable populations—such as children and the elderly—who depend on these services. Critics argued that while cost barriers should be addressed, it is equally important to maintain robust screening processes to protect the community from potential risks. The balance between encouraging volunteerism and ensuring public safety emerged as a key point of discussion.