| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 1797 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 377 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2021 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 1797 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on ENVIRONMENT | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | SEN. DAUGHERTY ABRAMS, 13th | |
| 15 | 15 | Dist. | |
| 16 | 16 | REP. QUINN, 82nd Dist. | |
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | ||
| 21 | 21 | AN ACT CONCERNING THE DRAW DOWN OF LAKE BESECK. | |
| 22 | 22 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 23 | 23 | Assembly convened: | |
| 24 | 24 | ||
| 25 | 25 | That the general statutes be amended to provide for a longer six-foot 1 | |
| 26 | 26 | draw-down period of Lake Beseck in odd-numbered years in order to 2 | |
| 27 | 27 | increase the likelihood of root exposure for aquatic plants to 3 | |
| 28 | 28 | temperatures that assist in the effective management of such plants 4 | |
| 29 | 29 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 30 | 30 | To better protect Lake Beseck from the effects of invasive aquatic plants. |