Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00908

Introduced
2/18/21  
Introduced
2/18/21  
Refer
2/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Refer
3/29/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Report Pass
5/14/21  
Report Pass
5/14/21  
Passed
5/25/21  
Passed
5/25/21  
Chaptered
6/1/21  
Chaptered
6/1/21  
Enrolled
6/2/21  
Enrolled
6/2/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Access To Certain Public Employees By The Exclusive Bargaining Representative Of A Public Employer Bargaining Unit.

Impact

The bill impacts state labor laws by establishing minimum requirements for public employers regarding information sharing and access to new employee orientations. It ensures that exclusive representatives can effectively communicate with newly hired employees, aiming to foster better relationships and support for employee rights. The legislation could facilitate a more organized bargaining process by giving unions timely access to necessary information about their members, thus strengthening collective bargaining efforts.

Summary

SB00908, titled 'An Act Concerning Access To Certain Public Employees By The Exclusive Bargaining Representative Of A Public Employer Bargaining Unit', aims to enhance the communication and access of exclusive representatives of public employee organizations to newly hired employees. The bill mandates that public employers provide specific information about new hires, including name, job title, department, work location, and contact details, within a specified timeframe. This allows unions to engage more effectively with employees from their date of hire, thereby potentially increasing union membership and participation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00908 appears to be supportive from labor and union representatives, who believe the bill will empower public employee organizations and improve conditions for workers. However, there may also be concerns from some public employers about the implications of increased union involvement and potential administrative burdens associated with complying with the information-sharing requirements. Overall, the bill is viewed positively by proponents of labor rights while raising some eyebrows among those skeptical of union influence.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB00908 could arise around the balance of power between public employers and employee organizations. Some may argue that the bill imposes excessive demands on public employers, potentially leading to conflicts regarding compliance and the use of sensitive employee information. Additionally, while the bill is designed to facilitate labor organization activities, opponents could argue that it may infringe on employees' privacy rights or lead to pressure on them to join unions. The actual implementation of the measures outlined in the bill will likely generate ongoing discussions about the appropriate level of access and the rights of both employees and employers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3309

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an electronic notary public; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1217

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an online notary public and online acknowledgment and proof of written instruments; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

NC S552

Modifications to Notary Public Act

CA AB1667

Electronic wills.

CA AB2961

Civil procedure: electronic filing and service.

LA HB572

Provides for electronic notaries public and electronic notarial acts

CA AB2283

Civil actions: electronic service.

CA SB666

Service of papers: electronic service by court.