Connecticut Senate Bill SR00009

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/21
• Refer: 5/10/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 5/25/21
• Passed: 6/4/21

Caption

Resolution Proposing Approval Of A Tentative Agreement Between The State Of Connecticut And The Connecticut State Employees Association (p-3b Bargaining Unit).

Impact

The passing of SR00009 would formally recognize the titles of State School Principal 1 and State School Principal 2 under the Connecticut State Employees Association, which signifies a significant step in acknowledging the roles' contributions to educational governance and administration. By including these positions under the bargaining unit, the bill aims to enhance collective bargaining rights and improve job security, benefits, and working conditions for school principals in Connecticut.

Summary

SR00009 is a Senate Resolution proposing the approval of a tentative agreement between the State of Connecticut and the Connecticut State Employees Association, specifically for the P-3B Bargaining Unit. The resolution focuses on the integration of employees holding the titles of State School Principal 1 and State School Principal 2 into the bargaining unit, which was submitted for approval on May 6, 2021. This agreement aims to address employment conditions and expand coverage for these vital educational roles within the state's employment framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR00009 appeared generally supportive among legislators, reflecting a recognition of the importance of educational leadership in the state. The approval of such agreements typically receives backing from both the members of the bargaining unit and those advocating for better compensation and working conditions for educators. However, some concern exists regarding the financial implications this agreement could have on state expenditures, leading to discussions and considerations around budgetary impact.

Contention

While the resolution passed with a considerable majority — 28 yeas against 8 nays — the debate surrounding it may reflect broader discussions about fiscal responsibility and state budgets in the context of increasing personnel costs. Some lawmakers expressed apprehension over the sustainability of agreements that mandate increased compensation or benefits without guaranteed funding sources, which could add strain to the state’s budget in the long term.