Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05247

Introduced
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/11/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/25/22  

Caption

An Act Concerning Volunteer Fire Departments And Ambulance Companies And The Definition Of Employer Under The State Occupational Safety And Health Act.

Impact

The impact of HB 5247 on state laws is significant as it revises existing statutes related to employer responsibilities, particularly concerning occupational safety. By refining the definition of employer to include volunteer fire departments and ambulance companies, this bill could lead to increased compliance with safety regulations for these organizations. This aligns with broader legislative efforts to enhance workplace safety and protect individuals engaged in volunteer emergency response activities, addressing potential gaps in coverage that may have existed previously.

Summary

House Bill 5247 addresses the definition of 'employer' under the State Occupational Safety and Health Act. This legislation aims to clarify the status of volunteer fire departments and ambulance companies concerning occupational safety regulations. By explicitly including these entities within the definition of employer, the bill seeks to ensure that volunteer organizations are held to certain safety standards, thereby promoting a safer working environment for all employees involved in such vital public service roles.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5247 has been supportive among legislators and public safety advocates who emphasize the importance of ensuring that volunteer organizations adhere to safety protocols similar to their paid counterparts. This appreciation for accountability is contrasted by some concerns about the operational implications for volunteer services, particularly regarding the potential for increased administrative burdens. Nevertheless, the overarching view appears to favor tightening safety regulations to safeguard those who selflessly serve their communities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between ensuring safety and avoiding excessive regulation that could discourage volunteer participation. While supporters argue that enhanced safety measures are necessary, opponents raise concerns about the financial and administrative strain these regulations may impose on volunteer organizations that frequently operate with limited resources. Discussions around the bill have highlighted the need for thoughtful implementation that respects the community-driven nature of volunteer emergency services while striving for necessary safety standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.