Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05453

Introduced
3/11/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
4/8/22  
Refer
4/8/22  
Report Pass
4/14/22  
Report Pass
4/14/22  
Engrossed
4/29/22  
Engrossed
4/29/22  
Report Pass
4/30/22  
Report Pass
4/30/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Chaptered
5/10/22  
Chaptered
5/10/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Passed
5/23/22  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Online Posting Of Certain State Contracts.

Impact

The impact of HB 05453 on state laws includes a shift towards greater accountability in government contracting. By requiring that significant contracts be posted online, the bill aims to create a level playing field for contractors and increase scrutiny of state spending. This change is expected to deter unethical practices and promote competition among contractors, which may lead to better pricing for the state and improved service delivery. The bill also includes provisions for waiving competitive bidding in certain emergency situations, potentially allowing for more agile responses to urgent needs while still promoting transparency.

Summary

House Bill 05453 mandates the online posting of certain state contracts, primarily aimed at increasing transparency in how state contracts are awarded. The bill proposes amendments to the existing statutes governing purchases and contracts, stipulating that all contracts exceeding fifty thousand dollars must be transparent through the State Contracting Portal. This step is intended to enhance public participation in competitive bidding and ensure a more open governmental process regarding state expenditures.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05453 appears to be positive among proponents of government reform and accountability. Supporters argue that increased disclosure helps combat corruption, fosters trust in government operations, and encourages better decision-making. However, some stakeholders have raised concerns about the administrative burden that increased transparency requirements could create, potentially complicating and slowing the procurement process. Opponents worry about the costs associated with implementing such an online system and whether all contractors have equal access to it.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 05453 include debates over how to balance transparency with efficiency in state contracting practices. Critics of the bill have voiced concerns that while transparency is essential, the requirements could hinder the speed with which contracts are awarded, especially in urgent circumstances where rapid action is necessary. Others argue that implementing an online posting system effectively will require resources that might exceed anticipated benefits. As these discussions evolve, the bill highlights the ongoing tension between the need for open governance and the practicalities of government operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2764

State acquisition of information technology goods and services: exemptions.

TX HB987

Relating to competitive procurement requirements for local governments.

ME LD2163

An Act to Require Consumer Consent for Certain Generation Service Contract Renewals

LA HB556

Provides relative to contracts let by certain entities for capital projects in Orleans Parish

CA AB1076

Contracts in restraint of trade: noncompete agreements.

IL HB1602

SANITARY DIST-CONTRACTS

IL SB0231

SANITARY DIST-CONTRACTS

LA HB884

Provides relative to procurement of certain services by public postsecondary education management boards (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)