Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00191

Introduced
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
4/7/22  

Caption

An Act Concerning Federally Qualified Health Center Payments And The Provision Of Nonemergency Dental Services At Such Centers.

Impact

The primary impact of SB00191 is the adjustment in how FQHCs receive funding for services provided to patients. By consolidating multiple encounters within a single day into one billing encounter under specific conditions, the bill seeks to simplify the reimbursement process. This could lead to improved access to dental care services for beneficiaries, as it encourages FQHCs to provide comprehensive care during single visits, thus enhancing patient outcomes and aligning with broader healthcare goals.

Summary

SB00191, titled 'An Act Concerning Federally Qualified Health Center Payments And The Provision Of Nonemergency Dental Services At Such Centers,' aims to amend the reimbursement structure for federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) under the Medicaid program. Specifically, the bill outlines changes to the reimbursement methodology to a per-client encounter basis, which is compliant with the prospective payment system mandated by federal law. This adjustment is expected to streamline payment processes for FQHCs, making them more efficient in delivering both medical and dental services.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00191 appears to be favorable, reflecting a consensus among healthcare stakeholders for enhancing the operational efficacy of FQHCs. Legislative voting on the bill indicated wide support, with a tally of 20 yeas and no nays during the committee vote, showcasing the bipartisan agreement on the importance of reforming health center reimbursements to better serve Medicaid patients.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the specific guidelines set forth regarding nonemergency dental services. The stipulation that such services must be conducted during one visit and could only be billed for additional encounters if medically necessary may raise questions about accessibility and patient care flexibility. Stakeholders might advocate for clearer definitions of 'medical necessity' to ensure that patient care is not hindered by bureaucratic constraints.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.