Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00359

Introduced
3/7/22  
Introduced
3/7/22  
Refer
3/7/22  
Refer
3/7/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Engrossed
4/27/22  
Engrossed
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Chaptered
5/13/22  
Chaptered
5/13/22  
Enrolled
5/17/22  
Passed
5/24/22  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Recommendations Regarding The Standard Nonforfeiture Law For Life Insurance.

Impact

The bill will impact existing statutes within the insurance framework and seeks to modernize the standards governing life insurance. By defining the minimum nonforfeiture amounts more clearly, the legislation aims to enhance consumer protection and ensure that individuals can confidently invest in life insurance products, knowing the benchmarks they can expect upon accessing their benefits. With an effective date set for policies delivered or renewed after October 1, 2022, the changes will prompt insurers to reassess their offerings to remain compliant with state regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 359, also known as the Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Recommendations Regarding The Standard Nonforfeiture Law For Life Insurance, focuses on adjusting the minimum values for paid-up annuity, cash surrender, or death benefits under life insurance contracts. The bill aims to implement recommendations from the Insurance Department to better align state laws with updated practices in the insurance industry, ensuring that consumers receive fair values for their policies upon cancellation or maturation. It establishes new standards for calculating these minimum values, which are crucial for policyholders.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 359 seems largely supportive among legislative members and industry stakeholders who recognize the need for modernization in life insurance practices. Proponents argue that this bill will enhance consumer confidence in financial products and provide consumers with essential safeguards. There is a general agreement on the importance of adjusting these regulations to reflect current economic conditions and practices in the financial sector.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for the bill, discussions have highlighted the potential for contention regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and the flexibility businesses require. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about the feasibility of implementing the new standards without imposing undue burdens on insurance providers, particularly smaller companies that may lack the resources to quickly adapt to legislative changes. These discussions underscore the need for ongoing dialogue and assessments to ensure that the law does not inadvertently hinder market competitiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.