Connecticut Senate Bill SB00361

Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/22
• Refer: 3/7/22
• Report Pass: 3/29/22
• Refer: 4/7/22
• Report Pass: 4/13/22
• Engrossed: 4/19/22
• Report Pass: 4/21/22
• Passed: 5/4/22
• Chaptered: 5/16/22
• Enrolled: 5/17/22
• Passed: 5/27/22

Caption

An Act Concerning Probate Court Operations.

Impact

If enacted, SB361 will significantly streamline processes within the probate courts, particularly for cases involving surrogacy agreements. This includes ensuring that intended parents can readily obtain parental rights upon the child's birth, which is important to protect the interests of families created through assisted reproductive technologies. By reducing procedural burdens and clarifying legal obligations, the bill is expected to enhance the efficiency and clarity of the probate court's operations, thus improving outcomes for families navigating these complex situations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 361, known as An Act Concerning Probate Court Operations, aims to amend various provisions related to probate court functions, particularly those governing parentage and surrogacy agreements. One of the notable changes includes clarifying procedures for adjudicating parentage for children born via surrogacy, which aligns with the intent of the intended parents while ensuring the gestational surrogate is not deemed the child's parent. Additionally, the bill provides regulations around the obligations of probate courts when issuing marriage licenses and handling minor emancipation cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB361 appears largely positive, with many stakeholders, including legal practitioners and advocates for children's rights, expressing support for the bill's intent to modernize and simplify legal processes related to parentage and surrogacy. However, there may be reservations from those advocating for broader rights and protections for surrogates, who could be impacted by the expedited legal recognition of intended parents over their rights.

Contention

While SB361 largely received bipartisan support, some contention arose regarding provisions that may not adequately address the rights of gestational surrogates in certain contexts. Critics argue that while the bill promotes efficient legal recognition for intended parents, it may overlook necessary protections for surrogates, who should also have clear rights and recourse in any arising disputes. This debate highlights the ongoing discussions about balancing the interests of intended parents and the rights of surrogates within the evolving landscape of reproductive law.