Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00472 Latest Draft

Bill / Comm Sub Version Filed 04/14/2022

                             
 
LCO    \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-R01-
SB.docx  
1 of 19 
  
General Assembly  Substitute Bill No. 472  
February Session, 2022 
 
 
 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE RISK -
LIMITING AUDITS WORKING GROUP.  
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. (NEW) (Effective January 1, 2024) (a) Not earlier than the 1 
fifteenth day after any state election and not later than two business 2 
days before the canvass of votes by the Secretary of the State, Treasurer 3 
and Comptroller, commencing on a day designated by the Secretary, the 4 
registrars of voters shall conduct a risk-limiting audit of such election. 5 
Each such audit shall be noticed in advance and be open to public 6 
observation. Any election official who participates in the administration 7 
and conduct of an audit pursuant to this section shall be compensated 8 
by the municipality at the standard rate of pay established by such 9 
municipality for elections. 10 
(b) (1) Except as provided in subdivision (2) of this subsection, the 11 
offices subject to a risk-limiting audit pursuant to this section shall be 12 
(A) the office of presidential elector, if applicable, (B) all applicable state 13 
offices, as defined in section 9-372 of the general statutes, (C) at least one 14 
representative in Congress, selected in a random drawing by the 15 
Secretary of the State, (D) at least five per cent, in the aggregate, of the 16 
offices of state senator and state representative, selected in a random 17 
drawing by the Secretary, and (E) any other office required to be audited 18  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
2 of 19 
 
by federal law. Whenever an office is randomly selected by the Secretary 19 
under this subsection, the selection process shall be open to the public. 20 
(2) (A) If an office of representative in Congress is subject to recanvass 21 
or an election contest pursuant to the general statutes, the Secretary of 22 
the State shall ensure such office is included in the office or offices 23 
selected under subparagraph (C) of subdivision (1) of this subsection. 24 
(B) If an office of state senator or state representative is subject to 25 
recanvass or an election contest pursuant to the general statutes, the 26 
Secretary of the State shall ensure such office is included in the offices 27 
selected under subparagraph (D) of subdivision (1) of this subsection. 28 
(c) Prior to the day designated by the Secretary of the State for the 29 
commencement of the risk-limiting audit described in subsection (a) of 30 
this section, the registrars of voters shall submit to the Secretary the 31 
ballot manifests created under section 3 of this act. 32 
(d) The risk-limiting audit described in subsection (a) of this section 33 
shall be conducted in accordance with instructions and procedures 34 
prescribed by the Secretary of the State, which instructions and 35 
procedures shall be consistent across all offices. The risk limit for each 36 
such audit shall be not more than five per cent. The results of each audit 37 
conducted pursuant to this section, including any such audit that 38 
produces an outcome of "INCONCLUSIVE" as described in subsection 39 
(e) of this section, shall be reported on a form and in a manner 40 
prescribed by the Secretary. Such reported results shall be filed with the 41 
Secretary, who shall immediately forward such reported results to The 42 
University of Connecticut for analysis. The University of Connecticut 43 
shall submit to the Secretary a written report regarding such analysis 44 
that describes any concerns identified. After receipt of such written 45 
report, the Secretary shall transmit to the State Elections Enforcement 46 
Commission a copy of such written report. 47 
(e) In the event a risk-limiting audit conducted pursuant to this 48 
section for a particular office produces an outcome of 49  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
3 of 19 
 
"INCONCLUSIVE", the Secretary of the State shall order a manual 50 
recount of all ballots cast for such office. 51 
(f) If the written report submitted by The University of Connecticut 52 
under subsection (d) of this section indicates that a voting tabulator 53 
failed to record votes accurately and in the manner provided by the 54 
general statutes, the Secretary of the State shall require that the voting 55 
tabulator be examined and recertified by the Secretary, or the Secretary's 56 
designee. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit the 57 
Secretary from requiring that a voting tabulator be examined and 58 
recertified. 59 
(g) The audit results reported to the Secretary of the State pursuant to 60 
subsection (d) of this section shall be open to public inspection and may 61 
be used as prima facie evidence of an irregularity in any contest arising 62 
pursuant to chapter 149 of the general statutes or for any other cause of 63 
action arising from such election. 64 
(h) If the audit officials are unable to reconcile the results from an 65 
audit described in subsection (a) of this section with the outcome of the 66 
person declared elected by virtue of having received the greatest 67 
number of votes, as determined by the paper ballots, the Secretary of the 68 
State shall conduct such further investigation of the voting tabulator as 69 
may be necessary for the purpose of reviewing whether or not to 70 
decertify the voting tabulator or tabulators in question or to order the 71 
voting tabulator to be examined and recertified pursuant to subsection 72 
(f) of this section. Any report produced by the Secretary as a result of 73 
such investigation shall be filed with the State Elections Enforcement 74 
Commission, and the commission may initiate such further 75 
investigation in accordance with subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of 76 
section 9-7b of the general statutes as may be required to determine if 77 
any violations of the general statutes concerning election law have been 78 
committed. 79 
(i) The individual paper ballots used at an election shall be carefully 80 
preserved and returned in their designated receptacle in accordance 81  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
4 of 19 
 
with the requirements of section 9-266 or 9-310 of the general statutes, 82 
whichever is applicable. 83 
(j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude any 84 
candidate or elector from seeking additional remedies pursuant to 85 
chapter 149 of the general statutes. 86 
(k) After an election, any voting tabulator may be kept locked for a 87 
period longer than that prescribed by sections 9-266, 9-310 and 9-447 of 88 
the general statutes, if such an extended period is ordered by either a 89 
court of competent jurisdiction, the Secretary of the State or the State 90 
Elections Enforcement Commission. Either the court or the Secretary of 91 
the State may order an audit of such voting tabulator to be conducted 92 
by such persons as the court or the Secretary may designate, provided 93 
the State Elections Enforcement Commission may order such an audit 94 
under the circumstances described in subsection (e) of this section. If the 95 
machine utilized in such election is an optical scan voting system, such 96 
order to lock such machine shall include the tabulator, memory card and 97 
all other components and processes utilized in the programming of such 98 
machine. 99 
(l) The Secretary of the State may adopt regulations, in accordance 100 
with the provisions of chapter 54 of the general statutes, as may be 101 
necessary for the conduct of risk-limiting audits described in subsection 102 
(a) of this section and to establish guidelines for expanded audits when 103 
the results from such an audit cannot be reconciled with the outcome of 104 
the person declared elected by virtue of having received the greatest 105 
number of votes, as determined by the paper ballots. 106 
(m) Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, the 107 
Secretary of the State shall have access to the code in any voting machine 108 
whenever any problem is discovered as a result of an audit described in 109 
subsection (a) of this section. 110 
(n) As used in this section: 111 
(1) "Risk-limiting audit" means a publicly verifiable auditing 112  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
5 of 19 
 
procedure that (A) manually examines a statistical sample of paper 113 
ballots which reflect the intents of the voters having cast such ballots, 114 
(B) produces an outcome of either "ACCEPTABLE" or 115 
"INCONCLUSIVE", and (C) guarantees a specified risk limit; 116 
(2) "Risk limit" means the maximum probability that an audit would 117 
produce an outcome of "ACCEPTABLE" when there is a disagreement 118 
between the person declared elected and the person who received the 119 
greatest number of votes as determined by the paper ballots; and 120 
(3) "State election" has the same meaning as provided in section 9-1 121 
of the general statutes. 122 
Sec. 2. Section 9-320f of the 2022 supplement to the general statutes is 123 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 124 
1, 2024): 125 
(a) (1) Not earlier than the fifteenth day after any [election or] federal 126 
or state primary and not later than two business days before the canvass 127 
of votes by the Secretary of the State, Treasurer and Comptroller, [for 128 
any federal or state election or primary,] or (2) not earlier than the 129 
fifteenth day after any municipal election or primary and not later than 130 
two business days before the canvass of votes by the town clerk, [for any 131 
municipal election or primary,] the registrars of voters shall conduct a 132 
manual audit, or [, for an election or primary held on or after January 1, 133 
2016,] an electronic audit authorized under section 9-320g, as amended 134 
by this act, of the votes recorded in not less than five per cent of the 135 
voting districts in the state, district or municipality, whichever is 136 
applicable. For the purposes of this section, any central location used in 137 
a municipality for the counting of absentee ballots shall be deemed a 138 
voting district. Such manual or electronic audit shall be noticed in 139 
advance and be open to public observation. Any election official who 140 
participates in the administration and conduct of an audit pursuant to 141 
this section shall be compensated by the municipality at the standard 142 
rate of pay established by such municipality for elections or primaries, 143 
as the case may be. 144  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
6 of 19 
 
(b) The voting districts subject to an audit described in subsection (a) 145 
of this section shall be selected in a random drawing by the Secretary of 146 
the State and such selection process shall be open to the public. The 147 
offices subject to an audit pursuant to this section shall be, (1) [in the 148 
case of an election where the office of presidential elector is on the ballot, 149 
all offices required to be audited by federal law, plus one additional 150 
office selected in a random drawing by the Secretary of the State, but in 151 
no case less than three offices, (2) in the case of an election where the 152 
office of Governor is on the ballot, all offices required to be audited by 153 
federal law, plus one additional office selected in a random drawing by 154 
the Secretary of the State, but in no case less than three offices, (3)] in the 155 
case of a municipal election, three offices or twenty per cent of the 156 
number of offices on the ballot, whichever is greater, selected at random 157 
by the municipal clerk, and [(4)] (2) in the case of a [primary election] 158 
primary, all offices required to be audited by federal law, plus one 159 
additional office, if any, but in no event less than twenty per cent of the 160 
offices on the ballot, selected in a random drawing by the municipal 161 
clerk. 162 
(c) If a selected voting district has an office that is subject to recanvass 163 
or an election or primary contest pursuant to the general statutes, the 164 
Secretary of the State shall select an alternative district, pursuant to the 165 
process described in subsection (b) of this section. 166 
(d) The manual or electronic audit described in subsection (a) of this 167 
section shall consist of the manual or electronic tabulation of the paper 168 
ballots cast and counted by each voting tabulator subject to such audit. 169 
Once complete, the vote totals established pursuant to such manual or 170 
electronic tabulation shall be compared to the results reported by the 171 
voting tabulator on the day of the election or primary. The results of 172 
such manual or electronic tabulation shall be reported on a form 173 
prescribed by the Secretary of the State which shall include the total 174 
number of ballots counted, the total votes received by each candidate in 175 
question, the total votes received by each candidate in question on 176 
ballots that were properly completed by each voter and the total votes 177  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
7 of 19 
 
received by each candidate in question on ballots that were not properly 178 
completed by each voter. Such [report] reported results shall be filed 179 
with the Secretary, [of the State] who shall immediately forward such 180 
[report] reported results to The University of Connecticut for analysis. 181 
The University of Connecticut shall [file] submit to the Secretary a 182 
written report [with the Secretary of the State] regarding such analysis 183 
that describes any discrepancies identified. After receipt of such written 184 
report, the Secretary [of the State shall file such report with] shall 185 
transmit to the State Elections Enforcement Commission a copy of such 186 
written report. 187 
(e) For the purposes of this section, a ballot that has not been properly 188 
completed will be deemed to be a ballot on which (1) votes have been 189 
marked by the voter outside the vote targets, (2) votes have been marked 190 
by the voter using a manual marking device that cannot be read by the 191 
voting tabulator, or (3) in the judgment of the registrars of voters, the 192 
voter marked the ballot in such a manner that the voting tabulator may 193 
not have read the marks as votes cast. 194 
(f) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 9-311, the Secretary of 195 
the State shall order a discrepancy recanvass of the returns of an election 196 
or primary for any office if a discrepancy, as defined in subsection (o) of 197 
this section, exists where the margin of victory in the race for such office 198 
is less than the amount of the discrepancy multiplied by the total 199 
number of voting districts where such race appeared on the ballot, 200 
provided in a year in which the Secretary of the State is a candidate for 201 
an office on the ballot and that office is subject to an audit as provided 202 
by this section, the State Elections Enforcement Commission shall order 203 
a discrepancy recanvass if a discrepancy, as defined by subsection (o) of 204 
this section, has occurred that could affect the outcome of the election or 205 
primary for such office. 206 
(g) If the written report submitted by The University of Connecticut 207 
[report described in] under subsection (d) of this section indicates that a 208 
voting tabulator failed to record votes accurately and in the manner 209 
provided by the general statutes, the Secretary of the State shall require 210  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
8 of 19 
 
that the voting tabulator be examined and recertified by the Secretary 211 
[of the State,] or the Secretary's designee. Nothing in this subsection 212 
shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary [of the State] from requiring 213 
that a voting tabulator be examined and recertified. 214 
(h) The audit [report filed] results reported to the Secretary of the 215 
State pursuant to subsection (d) of this section shall be open to public 216 
inspection and may be used as prima facie evidence of a discrepancy in 217 
any contest arising pursuant to chapter 149 or for any other cause of 218 
action arising from such election or primary. 219 
(i) If the audit officials are unable to reconcile the manual or electronic 220 
count from an audit described in subsection (a) of this section with the 221 
electronic vote tabulation and discrepancies from the election or 222 
primary, the Secretary of the State shall conduct such further 223 
investigation of the voting tabulator malfunction as may be necessary 224 
for the purpose of reviewing whether or not to decertify the voting 225 
tabulator or tabulators in question or to order the voting tabulator to be 226 
examined and recertified pursuant to subsection (g) of this section. Any 227 
report produced by the Secretary [of the State] as a result of such 228 
investigation shall be filed with the State Elections Enforcement 229 
Commission, and the commission may initiate such further 230 
investigation in accordance with subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of 231 
section 9-7b as may be required to determine if any violations of the 232 
general statutes concerning election law have been committed. 233 
(j) The individual paper ballots used at an election or primary shall 234 
be carefully preserved and returned in their designated receptacle in 235 
accordance with the requirements of section 9-266 or 9-310, whichever 236 
is applicable. 237 
(k) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude any 238 
candidate or elector from seeking additional remedies pursuant to 239 
chapter 149. 240 
(l) After an election or primary, any voting tabulator may be kept 241  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
9 of 19 
 
locked for a period longer than that prescribed by sections 9-266, 9-310 242 
and 9-447, if such an extended period is ordered by either a court of 243 
competent jurisdiction, the Secretary of the State or the State Elections 244 
Enforcement Commission. Either the court or the Secretary of the State 245 
may order an audit of such voting tabulator to be conducted by such 246 
persons as the court or the Secretary [of the State] may designate, 247 
provided the State Elections Enforcement Commission may order such 248 
an audit under the circumstances prescribed in subsection (f) of this 249 
section. If the machine utilized in such election or primary is an optical 250 
scan voting system, such order to lock such machine shall include the 251 
tabulator, memory card and all other components and processes utilized 252 
in the programming of such machine. 253 
(m) The Secretary of the State may adopt regulations, in accordance 254 
with the provisions of chapter 54, as may be necessary for the conduct 255 
of the manual or electronic tabulation of the paper ballots described in 256 
subsection (a) of this section and to establish guidelines for expanded 257 
audits when there are differences between the manual or electronic 258 
counts from the audit described in subsection (a) of this section and 259 
tabulator counts from the election or primary. 260 
(n) Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, the 261 
Secretary of the State shall have access to the code in any voting machine 262 
whenever any problem is discovered as a result of an audit described in 263 
subsection (a) of this section. 264 
(o) As used in this section: [, "discrepancy"] 265 
(1) "Discrepancy" means any difference in vote totals between 266 
tabulator counts from an election or primary and manual or electronic 267 
counts from an audit described in subsection (a) of this section in a 268 
voting district that exceeds one-half of one per cent of the lesser amount 269 
of the vote totals between such tabulator counts and such manual or 270 
electronic counts where such differences cannot be resolved through an 271 
accounting of ballots that were not marked properly in accordance with 272 
subsection (e) of this section; [, "state election" means "state election", as 273  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
10 of 19 
 
defined in section 9-1, "municipal election"] 274 
(2) "Municipal election" means a municipal election held pursuant to 275 
section 9-164; [, "manual"] 276 
(3) "Manual" means by hand and without the assistance of electronic 277 
equipment; and ["electronic"] 278 
(4) "Electronic" means through the use of equipment described in 279 
section 9-320g, as amended by this act. 280 
Sec. 3. (NEW) (Effective January 1, 2024) (a) Except as provided in 281 
subsection (b) of this section, not later than seventy-two hours after the 282 
close of the polls at each state election: 283 
(1) The election officials in each polling place shall create a ballot 284 
manifest for such polling place by manually verifying the number of 285 
ballots cast that comprise the result publicly announced by the 286 
moderator under subsection (a) of section 9-309 of the general statutes 287 
and recording such number on such ballot manifest, in accordance with 288 
procedures prescribed by the Secretary of the State; and 289 
(2) The absentee ballot counters in each central counting location shall 290 
create a ballot manifest for such central counting location by manually 291 
verifying the number of ballots cast that comprise the result publicly 292 
declared by the moderator under subsection (b) of section 9-150b of the 293 
general statutes and recording such number on such ballot manifest, in 294 
accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary of the State. 295 
(b) Not later than twenty-four hours after the completion of any 296 
recanvass conducted at a state election in a voting district, the recanvass 297 
officials shall create a ballot manifest for such district by manually 298 
verifying the number of ballots cast that comprise the vote announced 299 
by the moderator under subdivision (1) of subsection (c) of section 9-311 300 
of the general statutes and recording such number on such ballot 301 
manifest, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary of 302 
the State. 303  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
11 of 19 
 
(c) All ballot manifest creation procedures shall be open to public 304 
observation. 305 
(d) Immediately after a ballot manifest has been created pursuant to 306 
this section, the moderator shall submit such ballot manifest to the 307 
registrars of voters. 308 
Sec. 4. Section 9-323 of the general statutes is repealed and the 309 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2024): 310 
Any elector or candidate who claims that he is aggrieved by any 311 
ruling of any election official in connection with any election for 312 
presidential electors and for a senator in Congress and for 313 
representative in Congress or any of them, held in his town, or that there 314 
was a mistake in the count of the votes cast at such election for 315 
candidates for such electors, senator in Congress and representative in 316 
Congress, or any of them, at any voting district in his town, or any 317 
candidate for such an office who claims that he is aggrieved by a 318 
violation of any provision of section 9-355, 9-357 to 9-361, inclusive, 9-319 
364, 9-364a or 9-365 in the casting of absentee ballots at such election, 320 
may bring his complaint to any judge of the Supreme Court, in which 321 
he shall set out the claimed errors of such election official, the claimed 322 
errors in the count or the claimed violations of said sections. In any 323 
action brought pursuant to the provisions of this section, the 324 
complainant shall file a certification attached to the complaint indicating 325 
that a copy of the complaint has been sent by first-class mail or delivered 326 
to the State Elections Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is 327 
made prior to such election, such judge shall proceed expeditiously to 328 
render judgment on the complaint and shall cause notice of the hearing 329 
to be given to the Secretary of the State and the State Elections 330 
Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is made subsequent to the 331 
election, it shall be brought not later than fourteen days after the election 332 
or, if such complaint is brought in response to [the manual tabulation of 333 
paper ballots authorized] an audit conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, 334 
as amended by this act, or section 1 of this act, such complaint shall be 335 
brought not later than seven days after the close of any such [manual 336  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
12 of 19 
 
tabulation] audit, and in either such circumstance, the judge shall 337 
forthwith order a hearing to be had upon such complaint, upon a day 338 
not more than five or less than three days from the making of such order, 339 
and shall cause notice of not less than three or more than five days to be 340 
given to any candidate or candidates whose election may be affected by 341 
the decision upon such hearing, to such election official, to the Secretary 342 
of the State, to the State Elections Enforcement Commission and to any 343 
other party or parties whom such judge deems proper parties thereto, 344 
of the time and place for the hearing upon such complaint. Such judge, 345 
with two other judges of the Supreme Court to be designated by the 346 
Chief Court Administrator, shall, on the day fixed for such hearing and 347 
without unnecessary delay, proceed to hear the parties. If sufficient 348 
reason is shown, such judges may order any voting tabulators to be 349 
unlocked or any ballot boxes to be opened and a recount of the votes 350 
cast, including absentee ballots, to be made. Such judges shall 351 
thereupon, in the case they, or any two of them, find any error in the 352 
rulings of the election official, any mistake in the count of such votes or 353 
any violation of said sections, certify the result of their finding or 354 
decision, or the finding or decision of a majority of them, to the Secretary 355 
of the State before the first Monday after the second Wednesday in 356 
December. Such judges may order a new election or a change in the 357 
existing election schedule, provided such order complies with Section 358 
302 of the Help America Vote Act, P.L. 107-252, as amended from time 359 
to time. Such certificate of such judges, or a majority of them, shall be 360 
final upon all questions relating to the rulings of such election officials, 361 
to the correctness of such count and, for the purposes of this section 362 
only, such claimed violations, and shall operate to correct the returns of 363 
the moderators or presiding officers so as to conform to such finding or 364 
decision.  365 
Sec. 5. Section 9-324 of the general statutes is repealed and the 366 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2024): 367 
Any elector or candidate who claims that such elector or candidate is 368 
aggrieved by any ruling of any election official in connection with any 369  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
13 of 19 
 
election for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of the State, State 370 
Treasurer, Attorney General, State Comptroller or judge of probate, held 371 
in such elector's or candidate's town, or that there has been a mistake in 372 
the count of the votes cast at such election for candidates for said offices 373 
or any of them, at any voting district in such elector's or candidate's 374 
town, or any candidate for such an office who claims that such candidate 375 
is aggrieved by a violation of any provision of section 9-355, 9-357 to 9-376 
361, inclusive, 9-364, 9-364a or 9-365 in the casting of absentee ballots at 377 
such election or any candidate for the office of Governor, Lieutenant 378 
Governor, Secretary of the State, State Treasurer, Attorney General or 379 
State Comptroller, who claims that such candidate is aggrieved by a 380 
violation of any provision of sections 9-700 to 9-716, inclusive, may bring 381 
such elector's or candidate's complaint to any judge of the Superior 382 
Court, in which such elector or candidate shall set out the claimed errors 383 
of such election official, the claimed errors in the count or the claimed 384 
violations of said sections. In any action brought pursuant to the 385 
provisions of this section, the complainant shall send a copy of the 386 
complaint by first-class mail, or deliver a copy of the complaint by hand, 387 
to the State Elections Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is 388 
made prior to such election, such judge shall proceed expeditiously to 389 
render judgment on the complaint and shall cause notice of the hearing 390 
to be given to the Secretary of the State and the State Elections 391 
Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is made subsequent to the 392 
election, it shall be brought not later than fourteen days after the election 393 
or, if such complaint is brought in response to [the manual tabulation of 394 
paper ballots authorized] an audit conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, 395 
as amended by this act, or section 1 of this act, such complaint shall be 396 
brought not later than seven days after the close of any such [manual 397 
tabulation] audit and, in either such circumstance, such judge shall 398 
forthwith order a hearing to be had upon such complaint, upon a day 399 
not more than five nor less than three days from the making of such 400 
order, and shall cause notice of not less than three nor more than five 401 
days to be given to any candidate or candidates whose election may be 402 
affected by the decision upon such hearing, to such election official, the 403 
Secretary of the State, the State Elections Enforcement Commission and 404  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
14 of 19 
 
to any other party or parties whom such judge deems proper parties 405 
thereto, of the time and place for the hearing upon such complaint. Such 406 
judge shall, on the day fixed for such hearing and without unnecessary 407 
delay, proceed to hear the parties. If sufficient reason is shown, such 408 
judge may order any voting tabulators to be unlocked or any ballot 409 
boxes to be opened and a recount of the votes cast, including absentee 410 
ballots, to be made. Such judge shall thereupon, in case such judge finds 411 
any error in the rulings of the election official, any mistake in the count 412 
of the votes or any violation of said sections, certify the result of such 413 
judge's finding or decision to the Secretary of the State before the 414 
fifteenth day of the next succeeding December. Such judge may order a 415 
new election or a change in the existing election schedule. Such 416 
certificate of such judge of such judge's finding or decision shall be final 417 
and conclusive upon all questions relating to errors in the rulings of 418 
such election officials, to the correctness of such count, and, for the 419 
purposes of this section only, such claimed violations, and shall operate 420 
to correct the returns of the moderators or presiding officers, so as to 421 
conform to such finding or decision, unless the same is appealed from 422 
as provided in section 9-325.  423 
Sec. 6. Section 9-328 of the general statutes is repealed and the 424 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2024): 425 
Any elector or candidate claiming to have been aggrieved by any 426 
ruling of any election official in connection with an election for any 427 
municipal office or a primary for justice of the peace, or any elector or 428 
candidate claiming that there has been a mistake in the count of votes 429 
cast for any such office at such election or primary, or any candidate in 430 
such an election or primary claiming that he is aggrieved by a violation 431 
of any provision of sections 9-355, 9-357 to 9-361, inclusive, 9-364, 9-364a 432 
or 9-365 in the casting of absentee ballots at such election or primary, 433 
may bring a complaint to any judge of the Superior Court for relief 434 
therefrom. In any action brought pursuant to the provisions of this 435 
section, the complainant shall send a copy of the complaint by first-class 436 
mail, or deliver a copy of the complaint by hand, to the State Elections 437  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
15 of 19 
 
Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is made prior to such 438 
election or primary, such judge shall proceed expeditiously to render 439 
judgment on the complaint and shall cause notice of the hearing to be 440 
given to the Secretary of the State and the State Elections Enforcement 441 
Commission. If such complaint is made subsequent to such election or 442 
primary, it shall be brought not later than fourteen days after such 443 
election or primary, except that if such complaint is brought in response 444 
to [the manual tabulation of paper ballots, authorized] an audit 445 
conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, as amended by this act, or section 446 
1 of this act, such complaint shall be brought not later than seven days 447 
after the close of any such [manual tabulation] audit, to any judge of the 448 
Superior Court, in which he shall set out the claimed errors of the 449 
election official, the claimed errors in the count or the claimed violations 450 
of said sections. Such judge shall forthwith order a hearing to be had 451 
upon such complaint, upon a day not more than five nor less than three 452 
days from the making of such order, and shall cause notice of not less 453 
than three nor more than five days to be given to any candidate or 454 
candidates whose election or nomination may be affected by the 455 
decision upon such hearing, to such election official, the Secretary of the 456 
State, the State Elections Enforcement Commission and to any other 457 
party or parties whom such judge deems proper parties thereto, of the 458 
time and place for the hearing upon such complaint. Such judge shall, 459 
on the day fixed for such hearing and without unnecessary delay, 460 
proceed to hear the parties. If sufficient reason is shown, he may order 461 
any voting tabulators to be unlocked or any ballot boxes to be opened 462 
and a recount of the votes cast, including absentee ballots, to be made. 463 
Such judge shall thereupon, if he finds any error in the rulings of the 464 
election official or any mistake in the count of the votes, certify the result 465 
of his finding or decision to the Secretary of the State before the tenth 466 
day succeeding the conclusion of the hearing. Such judge may order a 467 
new election or primary or a change in the existing election schedule. 468 
Such certificate of such judge of his finding or decision shall be final and 469 
conclusive upon all questions relating to errors in the ruling of such 470 
election officials, to the correctness of such count, and, for the purposes 471 
of this section only, such claimed violations, and shall operate to correct 472  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
16 of 19 
 
the returns of the moderators or presiding officers, so as to conform to 473 
such finding or decision, except that this section shall not affect the right 474 
of appeal to the Supreme Court and it shall not prevent such judge from 475 
reserving such questions of law for the advice of the Supreme Court as 476 
provided in section 9-325. Such judge may, if necessary, issue his writ of 477 
mandamus, requiring the adverse party and those under him to deliver 478 
to the complainant the appurtenances of such office, and shall cause his 479 
finding and decree to be entered on the records of the Superior Court in 480 
the proper judicial district.  481 
Sec. 7. Subsection (a) of section 9-329a of the general statutes is 482 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 483 
1, 2024): 484 
(a) Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election 485 
official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-486 
423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who 487 
alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of the votes cast at such 488 
primary, or (3) candidate in such a primary who alleges that he is 489 
aggrieved by a violation of any provision of sections 9-355, 9-357 to 9-490 
361, inclusive, 9-364, 9-364a or 9-365 in the casting of absentee ballots at 491 
such primary, may bring his complaint to any judge of the Superior 492 
Court for appropriate action. In any action brought pursuant to the 493 
provisions of this section, the complainant shall file a certification 494 
attached to the complaint indicating that a copy of the complaint has 495 
been sent by first-class mail or delivered to the State Elections 496 
Enforcement Commission. If such complaint is made prior to such 497 
primary such judge shall proceed expeditiously to render judgment on 498 
the complaint and shall cause notice of the hearing to be given to the 499 
Secretary of the State and the State Elections Enforcement Commission. 500 
If such complaint is made subsequent to such primary it shall be 501 
brought, not later than fourteen days after such primary, or if such 502 
complaint is brought in response to [the manual tabulation of paper 503 
ballots, described in] an audit conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, as 504 
amended by this act, or section 1 of this act, such complaint shall be 505  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
17 of 19 
 
brought, not later than seven days after the close of any such [manual 506 
tabulation] audit, to any judge of the Superior Court.  507 
Sec. 8. Subsection (b) of section 9-3 of the general statutes is repealed 508 
and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2024): 509 
(b) During any municipal, state or federal election, primary or 510 
recanvass, or any audit conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, as 511 
amended by this act, or section 1 of this act, the Secretary of the State 512 
may issue an order, whether orally or in writing, to any registrar of 513 
voters or moderator to correct any irregularity or impropriety in the 514 
conduct of such election, primary or recanvass or audit. Any such order 515 
shall be effective upon issuance. As soon as practicable after issuance of 516 
an oral order pursuant to this subsection, the Secretary shall reduce such 517 
order to writing, cite within such order any applicable provision of law 518 
authorizing such order and cause a copy of such written order to be 519 
delivered to the individual who is the subject of such order or, in the 520 
case that such order was originally issued in writing, issue a subsequent 521 
written order that conforms to such requirements. The Superior Court, 522 
on application of the Secretary or the Attorney General, may enforce by 523 
appropriate decree or process any such order issued pursuant to this 524 
subsection. 525 
Sec. 9. Subdivision (3) of subsection (b) of section 9-229 of the general 526 
statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof 527 
(Effective January 1, 2024): 528 
(3) The duties of each regional election monitor shall include, but not 529 
be limited to: (A) Holding the regional instructional sessions described 530 
in subdivision (2) of this subsection; (B) communicating with registrars 531 
of voters to assist, to the extent permitted under law, in preparations for 532 
and operations of any election, primary or recanvass, or any audit 533 
conducted pursuant to section 9-320f, as amended by this act, or section 534 
1 of this act; and (C) transmitting any order issued by the Secretary of 535 
the State, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 9-3, as amended by this 536 
act. 537  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
18 of 19 
 
Sec. 10. Subsection (a) of section 9-229b of the general statutes is 538 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 539 
1, 2024): 540 
(a) There shall be a regional election monitor within each planning 541 
region, as defined in section 4-124i, who shall represent, consult with 542 
and act on behalf of the Secretary of the State in preparations for and 543 
operations of any election, primary or recanvass, or any audit conducted 544 
pursuant to section 9-320f, as amended by this act, or section 1 of this 545 
act. 546 
Sec. 11. Section 9-320g of the general statutes is repealed and the 547 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2024): 548 
Notwithstanding any provision of this title, the Secretary of the State, 549 
in consultation and coordination with The University of Connecticut, 550 
may authorize the use of electronic equipment for the purpose of 551 
conducting any audit required pursuant to section 9-320f, [for any 552 
primary or general election held on or after January 1, 2016] as amended 553 
by this act, or section 1 of this act, provided (1) the Secretary of the State 554 
prescribes specifications for (A) the testing, set-up and operation of such 555 
equipment, and (B) the training of election officials in the use of such 556 
equipment; and (2) the Secretary of the State and The University of 557 
Connecticut agree that such equipment is sufficient in quantity to 558 
accommodate the total number of audits to be conducted. Nothing in 559 
this section shall preclude any candidate or elector from seeking 560 
additional remedies pursuant to chapter 149 as a result of any 561 
information revealed by such process. 562 
Sec. 12. (Effective October 1, 2022) The Secretary of the State shall 563 
establish a pilot program for the conduct of risk-limiting audits at 564 
municipal elections in 2023. The Secretary shall randomly select three 565 
municipalities for participation in such pilot program, in accordance 566 
with the following: (1) One municipality with a population of less than 567 
twenty thousand; (2) one municipality with a population of twenty 568 
thousand or greater, but less than ninety thousand; and (3) one 569  Substitute Bill No. 472 
 
 
LCO    {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00472-
R01-SB.docx }   
19 of 19 
 
municipality with a population of ninety thousand or greater. For the 570 
purposes of this section, "population" means the estimated number of 571 
people according to the most recent version of the State Register and 572 
Manual prepared pursuant to section 3-90 of the general statutes. 573 
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following 
sections: 
 
Section 1 January 1, 2024 New section 
Sec. 2 January 1, 2024 9-320f 
Sec. 3 January 1, 2024 New section 
Sec. 4 January 1, 2024 9-323 
Sec. 5 January 1, 2024 9-324 
Sec. 6 January 1, 2024 9-328 
Sec. 7 January 1, 2024 9-329a(a) 
Sec. 8 January 1, 2024 9-3(b) 
Sec. 9 January 1, 2024 9-229(b)(3) 
Sec. 10 January 1, 2024 9-229b(a) 
Sec. 11 January 1, 2024 9-320g 
Sec. 12 October 1, 2022 New section 
 
Statement of Legislative Commissioners: 
In Section 1, "or primary" was deleted throughout, "in accordance with" 
was changed to "as described in" in Subsec. (d), "subsection (g)" was 
changed to "subsection (f)" in Subsec. (h) and "prescribed" was changed 
to "described" in Subsec. (k) for accuracy. 
 
GAE Joint Favorable Subst.