Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00018

Introduced
2/9/22  
Introduced
2/9/22  
Refer
2/9/22  
Refer
2/9/22  
Report Pass
3/11/22  
Report Pass
3/11/22  
Engrossed
3/16/22  
Engrossed
3/16/22  
Passed
3/16/22  
Passed
3/16/22  
Passed
3/16/22  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Jane K. Grossman Of Hamden To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Impact

The confirmation of a judge can have significant implications for state laws, particularly in the areas of jurisprudence that the judge will oversee. Once confirmed, Judge Grossman will contribute to the development of legal precedents and interpretations within the Superior Court, potentially affecting a variety of issues from civil rights to criminal justice. Her judicial philosophy and decisions may influence how laws are applied and enforced in the state, which could lead to shifts in legal outcomes based on her interpretations of existing legislation.

Summary

SJ00018 is a resolution confirming the nomination of the Honorable Jane K. Grossman to serve as a Judge of the Superior Court for a term of eight years beginning April 29, 2022. The resolution reflects the legislative body’s endorsement of the candidate put forth by the Governor. Such nominations are critical as they ensure the judiciary is filled with qualified judges who uphold the law and serve the community's interests effectively. The process of judicial appointments is often scrutinized to ensure that the selected individuals possess the requisite qualifications and integrity.

Contention

While the documentation surrounding SJ00018 does not explicitly detail points of contention, judicial nominations often spark debate among legislators. Factors such as the nominee's background, previous rulings, and overall judicial philosophy can lead to polarized opinions. During debates, some members may advocate for judicial independence and the importance of appointing judges who reflect the values of the community, while others may emphasize the need for a judiciary that adheres closely to legislative intent. The unanimous vote in favor indicates potential consensus, but underlying discussions may reveal varying viewpoints regarding judicial philosophy and its implications for state governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SJ00194

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Susan E. Nugent, Esquire, Of Hamden To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00195

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Pedro E. Segarra Of Hartford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00003

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable David P. Gold Of Middlefield To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00004

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable John B. Farley Of Bloomfield To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00010

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Matthew E. Frechette Of Branford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00002

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Gerald L. Harmon Of Southington To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00011

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Mark T. Gould Of North Haven To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00012

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Barbara Bailey Jongbloed Of Madison To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00001

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Robert E. Young Of South Glastonbury To Be A Senior Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00017

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Dawne G. Westbrook Of Glastonbury To Be A Judge Of The Appellate Court And A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.