Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05286

Introduced
1/13/23  
Introduced
1/13/23  
Refer
1/13/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning Hearings On Waiver Requests Before The Connecticut Siting Council.

Impact

If passed, HB05286 would amend Chapter 277a of the General Statutes to formally codify the requirement of holding public hearings prior to granting waivers. This change is expected to affect the procedural operations of the Connecticut Siting Council by allowing for greater stakeholder engagement and providing local communities with a voice regarding decisions that could impact their environment and quality of life. The increased public scrutiny accompanying such hearings could lead to more informed decisions and public accountability.

Summary

House Bill 05286 is an act aimed at enhancing the procedural requirements for the Connecticut Siting Council by mandating public hearings for waiver requests. Specifically, the bill proposes that any party requesting a waiver of the council's rules or orders must first have their request heard during a public hearing. The intent behind this requirement is to increase transparency and public involvement in the decision-making processes of the Siting Council, particularly regarding important regulatory matters related to energy and infrastructure.

Contention

While supporters of HB05286 argue that the requirement for public hearings will ensure that the interests of various stakeholders—particularly local communities—are considered, opponents may contend that it could also lead to delays in the decision-making process and complicate the waiver approvals. There may be concerns that the additional procedural steps could hinder the council's ability to respond swiftly to urgent waiver requests, potentially affecting the timeliness of energy projects or infrastructure developments.

Notable_points

During the discussions surrounding the bill, different viewpoints may arise. Proponents emphasize the importance of public participation in regulatory processes, arguing it enhances democratic governance and accountability. In contrast, concerns about potential bureaucratic hurdles reflect broader debates on how best to balance industry needs with community interests in state-level energy policy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.