Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06872 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/30/2023

                     
Researcher: MHF 	Page 1 	3/30/23 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6872  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING FAITHLESS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS 
AND AUTHORIZING MANDAMUS ACTIONS RELATED TO THE 
CERTIFICATION OR DECLARATION OF ELECTION RESULTS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill creates several practices regarding the certification and 
election of public officials. Specifically, the bill does the following:  
1. establishes procedures for nullifying the vote of, and removing 
and replacing, a presidential elector who does not vote as 
pledged (i.e., a faithless elector); 
2. establishes a criminal penalty for becoming a faithless elector and 
a bar from serving as a presidential elector in the future; and 
3. authorizes any state resident to bring mandamus actions against 
certain officials charged with certifying election results. 
The bill also makes technical changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2023 
FAITHLESS ELECTORS 
Under existing law, when a voter casts a ballot for a presidential 
candidate, the ballot is cast for a slate of presidential electors who have 
pledged to vote for that candidate when all state electors convene to 
choose the president and vice president of the United States (CGS § 9-
175). State law currently requires presidential electors to vote for the 
presidential and vice-presidential candidates under whose names they 
ran on the official ballot, but it does not impose consequences if they fail 
to do so.    
  2023HB-06872-R000336-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MHF 	Page 2 	3/30/23 
 
In the case of a presidential elector who does not vote for the 
candidates under whose name he or she ran on the ballot, the bill does 
the following:  
1. nullifies the vote;  
2. requires the elector to forfeit his or her office as presidential 
elector, causing a vacancy; 
3. requires the other electors present to elect by ballot a replacement 
elector to fill the vacancy;  
4. requires the replacement elector to vote for the candidates to 
whom the elector being replaced was pledged; 
5. bars future eligibility as an elector; and 
6. subjects the elector to a fine of up to $1,000, up to a year in prison, 
or both. 
The bill also applies these provisions to replacement presidential 
electors who fail to vote for the candidates to whom the elector being 
replaced was pledged. 
WRIT OF MANDAMUS 
The bill allows any state resident to bring a mandamus action directly 
to the Connecticut Supreme Court to compel certain officers to comply 
with laws relating to certification or declaration of election results (see 
the table below, organized by bill section number). The bill also 
establishes the court’s jurisdiction to hear such cases. If a resident 
prevails in the action, the bill authorizes the recovery of court costs and 
reasonable attorney’s fees. 
A writ of mandamus is a court order that compels a public official or 
agency to perform a specific duty. However, under Connecticut 
Supreme Court precedent, a writ is only proper when “(1) the law 
imposes on the party against whom the writ would run a duty the 
performance of which is mandatory and not discretionary; (2) the party 
applying for the writ has a clear legal right to have the duty performed;  2023HB-06872-R000336-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MHF 	Page 3 	3/30/23 
 
and (3) there is no other specific adequate remedy” (Miles v. Foley, 253 
Conn. 381 (2000)). 
Table: Covered Offices and Certifying Officials 
§ Office to be Certified 	Certifying Officials 
2 
Congressional legislators and 
presidential electors 
Treasurer, secretary of the state (SOTS), 
and comptroller 
3 Vacancy for Congressional seat Treasurer, SOTS, and comptroller 
4 Congressional senator Governor and SOTS 
5 
Governor, lieutenant governor, and 
constitutional officers 
People authorized to receive and count the 
votes and the General Assembly 
6 State legislators and probate judges Treasurer, SOTS, and comptroller 
 
BACKGROUND 
Related Case 
In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed a Washington Supreme 
Court decision, holding that a state may constitutionally enforce a 
presidential elector’s pledge to support his or her party’s nominee—and 
the state voters’ choice—for president (Chiafalo et al. v. Washington, 140 
S. Ct. 2316 (2020)). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Government Administration and Elections Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 13 Nay 6 (03/15/2023)