Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06872

Introduced

3/3/23

Refer

3/3/23

Report Pass

3/15/23

Report Pass

3/15/23

Refer

3/24/23

Refer

3/24/23

Report Pass

3/30/23

Report Pass

3/30/23

Refer

4/12/23

Refer

4/12/23

Report Pass

4/19/23

Report Pass

4/19/23

Engrossed

5/16/23

Report Pass

5/18/23

Report Pass

5/18/23

Caption

An Act Concerning Faithless Presidential Electors And Authorizing Mandamus Actions Related To The Certification Or Declaration Of Election Results.

Impact

This bill modifies existing statutes concerning the behavior of presidential electors and lays down new protocols for the declaration and certification of electoral results. With its enactment, it may enhance the legal framework governing elections in Connecticut by ensuring that electors adhere to their pledges. Additionally, the bill introduces provisions that empower any resident to initiate legal actions against the state officials responsible for carrying out election protocols, thereby enhancing public participation in democracy and mandating accountability among public officials.

Summary

House Bill 6872, titled 'An Act Concerning Faithless Presidential Electors and Authorizing Mandamus Actions Related to the Certification or Declaration of Election Results,' aims to ensure that presidential electors in Connecticut cast their votes according to the candidates to whom they are pledged. The bill establishes stipulations that nullify the votes of electors who do not vote as pledged, rendering them ineligible for future elections as electors and exposing them to potential imprisonment or fines. The legislation seeks to reinforce the integrity of the electoral process by holding electors accountable for their votes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 6872 appears to be supportive among proponents of electoral reform, who argue that it strengthens electoral integrity. Supporters contend that holding electors accountable for their votes protects the democratic process and reflects the will of the voters. Conversely, there are concerns among critics regarding the implications for electors' freedom of choice. Opponents argue that while accountability is important, forces that limit electors' discretion could inadvertently undermine the spirit of representative democracy, especially if situations arise where electors may feel compelled to vote contrary to their beliefs or a changing political landscape.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions surrounding this bill include the balance between electoral accountability and electors' independence. Critics have expressed that strict penalties could dissuade responsible individuals from serving as electors, resulting in unintended consequences, such as a chilling effect on potential candidates. The bill also raises questions about the legal implications of mandamus actions, which may open avenues for residents to challenge the functioning of state officials in the electoral process.

Latest HB06872 Activity

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00428

An Act Concerning Business Registrations Filed With The Secretary Of The State.

CT SB01119

An Act Concerning Business Registrations With The Office Of The Secretary Of The State.

CT SB01343

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Intergovernmental Policy And Planning Division Within The Office Of Policy And Management.

TN HB0459

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 43, Chapter 38; Title 48, Chapter 24; Title 48, Chapter 245; Title 48, Chapter 246; Title 48, Chapter 249; Title 48, Chapter 25; Title 48, Chapter 64; Title 48, Chapter 65 and Title 61, Chapter 3, relative to entities filing documents with the secretary of state.

TN SB0306

CT HB05273

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Intergovernmental Policy And Planning Division Within The Office Of Policy And Management, Audits And Municipal Finance.

AL HB358

Relating to vessels; to amend Sections 33-5-3, 33-5-4, 33-5-5, 33-5-6, 33-5-7, 33-5-8, 33-5-10, 33-5-12, 33-5-15, 33-5-16, 33-5-20, 33-5-21, 33-5-22, 33-5-23, 33-5-25, 33-5-26, 33-5-27, 33-5-28, 33-5-30, 33-5-31, 33-5-32, 33-5-34, 33-5-35, 33-5-36, 33-5-51, 33-5-52, 33-5-53, 33-5-54, 33-5-55, 33-5-56, 33-5-58, 33-5-59, 33-5-60, 33-5-61, 33-5-62, 33-5-63, 33-5-64, 33-5-65, 33-5-66, 33-5-67, 33-5-68, 33-5-69, 33-5-70, 33-5-71, 33-5-72, 33-5-73, 33-5-74, 33-5-75, 33-5-77, 33-5-79, 33-5-81, Code of Alabama 1975, to establish the classification of boating violation as a recognized criminal offense classification and to reclassify various criminal offenses as boating violations and further provide for criminal penalties; to further provide for the requirement to report certain boating accidents; to further provide for the general operational and equipment requirements of a vessel; to further provide for vessel horsepower requirements and the use of engine cut-off switches; to establish the uniform electronic boating traffic ticket and provide for its issuance; to amend Sections 12-12-50, 12-12-51, 12-12-52, 12-12-55, and 12-19-179, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide the district court with jurisdiction over boating violations and further provide for the court costs and fees for boating violations; to amend Section 41-27-6, Code of Alabama 1975, to rename the Marine Police Division within the Department of Public Safety to the Marine Patrol Division; to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style; to repeal Sections 33-5-22.1, 33-5-29, 33-5-33, and 33-5-78, Code of Alabama 1975; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.

CT HB06605

An Act Concerning Business Registrations, Trade Names, The Commercial Recording Division Within The Office Of The Secretary Of The State And Commercial Registered Agents.