Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00156

Introduced
1/13/23  
Refer
1/13/23  
Refer
1/13/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Engrossed
6/2/23  
Engrossed
6/2/23  
Report Pass
6/3/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning Expenditures From The Healthy Homes Fund.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to have a significant positive impact on state laws concerning home repair funding and support. By focusing on specific communities with pressing structural issues, SB00156 aims to enhance property values and residents' quality of life in areas that suffer from natural damage. Additionally, it acknowledges and addresses local concerns related to housing stability and structural integrity, thereby reinforcing the state's commitment to community welfare.

Summary

SB00156 aims to address structural damage to homes and condominium associations in specific areas affected by subsidence and water infiltration. The bill provides for the allocation of up to one million dollars from the Healthy Homes Fund, intended for grants-in-aid. It specifically targets homeowners in the immediate vicinity of the West River in New Haven and Woodbridge. The funding could support necessary repairs and prevent further deterioration of homes, thereby improving living conditions for affected residents.

Sentiment

The discussions surrounding SB00156 indicate a supportive sentiment amongst legislators who recognize the need for intervention in communities at risk from structural deficiencies. While specific voting results were mixed, with 11 yeas and 24 nays during the Senate Roll Call Vote 339, proponents argue that the bill is crucial for community empowerment through financial assistance. This contrasts with opponents who may raise concerns over the allocation of funds and the adequacy of the grant process.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the funding mechanisms and the criteria for distributing the grants. Legislators opposed to the bill expressed concerns over the potential limits of the fund and questioned whether it would adequately cover all necessary repairs across various affected areas. The debate highlighted the balance between efficient use of state resources and the need for comprehensive support for community-driven initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.