Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00953

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/19/23  
Report Pass
5/19/23  
Passed
5/30/23  
Passed
5/30/23  
Chaptered
6/1/23  
Chaptered
6/1/23  
Enrolled
6/5/23  
Enrolled
6/5/23  
Passed
6/7/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning Racial Profiling.

Impact

The bill has significant implications for state law enforcement operations. It establishes a system for collecting and reporting data on traffic stops, ensuring that police departments record specific information related to the race, ethnicity, age, and gender of individuals stopped. This data collection is intended to facilitate monitoring and accountability, potentially reducing instances of racial profiling. Additionally, the bill provides for civil immunity to officers who follow the prescribed recording practices in good faith, aiming to encourage compliance without fear of legal repercussions.

Summary

Substitute Senate Bill No. 953, known as the 'Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act,' was designed to address concerns regarding racial profiling by law enforcement agencies. The bill aims to prohibit the practice of stopping, detaining, or searching individuals based solely on their race, ethnicity, age, gender, or sexual orientation. This legislation mandates that each municipal police department and the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection establish written policies to eliminate any form of racial profiling, thereby promoting a more equitable and just legal framework for all citizens.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00953 appears to be overwhelmingly supportive among lawmakers, as evidenced by a unanimous vote (150 yeas, 0 nays) during the House Roll Call Vote 193 on May 30, 2023. Proponents argue that this bill represents a crucial step towards protecting civil rights and increasing transparency in police practices. However, some critics remain concerned about the implementation and effectiveness of data collection methods and whether they will lead to genuine changes on the ground.

Contention

While the bill is largely endorsed, there are notable points of contention regarding the practical aspects of enforcing these policies and whether they will result in substantive changes within law enforcement agencies. Opponents may raise concerns regarding resource allocation for proper training and data collection processes, fearing that without adequate support, the initiative may be ineffectively implemented. The dialogue around the bill showcases broader societal issues regarding race, equity, and policing in contemporary America.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.