Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00996 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/24/2023

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sSB-996 
AN ACT CONCERNING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE 
STATE, ESTABLISHING A HOUSING AUTHORITY RESIDENT 
QUALITY OF LIFE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AND A 
HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER TASK FORCE AND REQUIRING 
THE DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN NATURAL PERSON OWNERSHIP 
INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY. 
As Amended by Senate "A" (LCO 8443) 
Senate Calendar No.: 119  
 
Primary Analyst: LG 	5/24/23 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ 
Department of Housing GF - Cost Up to 
285,574 
Up to 
286,463 
State Comptroller - Fringe 
Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost Up to 
15,233 
Up to 
15,614 
Note: GF=General Fund  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill requires the Department of Housing (DOH) to establish a 
housing authority resident quality of life improvement grant program, 
which results in a total state cost of up to $300,807 in FY 24 and up to 
$302,077 in FY 25, continuing annually, for both grants and staff to 
administer the program.  
The bill requires DOH to award grants totaling up to $250,000 per 
year to housing authorities that apply. DOH is anticipated to require up 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 42.82% of payroll in FY 24.  2023SB-00996-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 2 
 
 
to one part-time housing specialist at a state cost of $50,807 in FY 24 
($35,574 in salary and $15,233 in fringe benefits) and $52,077 in FY 25 
($36,463 in salary and $15,614 in fringe benefits) to administer the 
program. The bill does not appropriate funding for the program. 
The bill also establishes a task force to study the implementation of 
the federal Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8) in 
Connecticut. This has no fiscal impact because PA 17-236 prohibits 
transportation allowances for task force members. 
Additionally, the bill specifies a reporting requirement for certain 
housing providers. This has no fiscal impact. 
Senate "A" makes technical changes and minor changes to reporting 
requirements for certain housing providers which does not result in a 
fiscal impact.  
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to changes in employee wage and 
benefit costs and appropriations for the grant program. 
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely 
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General 
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is 
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any 
specific department.