Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00019

Introduced
1/4/23  
Refer
1/4/23  
Refer
1/4/23  
Report Pass
1/18/23  
Engrossed
1/25/23  
Passed
1/25/23  
Passed
1/25/23  
Passed
1/25/23  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Earl B. Richards, Iii Of Woodbridge To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Impact

The passage of SJ00019 reflects the ongoing collaboration between the executive and legislative branches of state government in reinforcing judicial leadership. Confirmations such as this are critical for maintaining the operation of the courts and ensuring that the judicial system functions effectively. By confirming nominees, the legislature ensures that qualified individuals are placed in positions of judicial responsibility, which is essential for public trust in the state’s legal framework.

Summary

SJ00019 is a resolution confirming the nomination of the Honorable Earl B. Richards, III of Woodbridge to be a judge of the Superior Court. The resolution signifies the approval of the Governor's nomination for Richards, who is intended to serve a term of eight years beginning on March 10, 2023. This nomination is part of a broader process within the state's judicial system where the legislative assembly plays a role in the approval of judicial appointments made by the executive branch.

Contention

There may be discussions surrounding the nomination process given that judicial appointments can often evoke diverse opinions based on political affiliations or previous judgments made by the nominees. Although the voting history for SJ00019 indicates strong support with 142 votes in favor and none against, it is not uncommon for judicial nominations to be contentious, as stakeholders may have varying perspectives on the qualifications and judicial philosophies of nominees.

Voting_history

The resolution was passed unanimously on January 25, 2023, indicating a strong bipartisan support for the confirmation of Earl B. Richards, III. Such overwhelming support often suggests that the nominee's qualifications were well-regarded, although specific points of dissent, if any, were not documented in the provided materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.