Connecticut 2024 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05150 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 05/02/2024

                     
Researcher: DC 	Page 1 	5/2/24 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 5150 (as amended by House "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING CANNABIS AND HEMP REGULATION.  
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
SUMMARY 
§§ 1, 4, 6, 23 & 26-35 — INFUSED BEVERAGES 
Establishes a new category of THC product, which it classifies as an “infused beverage” 
and requires it to meet many of the requirements for manufacturer hemp products; 
generally requires infused beverage manufacturers to be licensed; only allows certain 
cannabis establishments and package stores to sell these beverages; prohibits sales to 
anyone under age 21; sets various requirements for testing, signs, packages, and labels; 
allows the sale of “legacy infused beverages” until September 30, 2024; imposes a $1 
assessment per container; makes it a CUTPA violation to violate certain provisions 
§ 1 — MARIJUANA, CANNABIS, CANNABIS-TYPE SUBSTANCES, 
AND SYNTHETIC AND MA NUFACTURED CANNABINO IDS 
Narrows the definition of “marijuana” and “cannabis” by removing from the definition 
(1) the seeds and (2) synthetic cannabinoids; correspondingly deletes references to seeds in 
the “cannabis-type substances” definition; redefines “synthetic cannabinoids” by 
specifically excluding manufactured cannabinoids and redefines “manufactured 
cannabinoids” to specify how they are created rather than basing the definition on their 
natural structure or the effect they have 
§§ 1, 31 & 32 — HIGH- AND MODERATE-THC HEMP PRODUCTS 
Simplifies the THC thresholds for when a product is considered a high-THC hemp product 
by imposing a uniform threshold regardless of the product type; establishes the category of 
“moderate-THC hemp product” and places various requirements on sales (e.g., only to 
those age 21 and above and only from cannabis establishments or places with a DCP 
certificate) and requires it to meet many of the requirements for manufacturer hemp 
products 
§§ 2 & 3 — MARIJUANA TESTING 
Requires each cannabis establishment to submit marijuana (i.e., cannabis) samples to a 
cannabis testing laboratory for testing; sets testing and retesting method standards and 
procedures 
§§ 5, 9, 11, 14 & 20 — MICRO-CULTIVATORS 
Allows certain social equity cultivator applicants to apply for a micro-cultivator license; 
eliminates the ability for a micro-cultivator to use its own employees to deliver cannabis; 
allows micro-cultivators to sell cannabis seedlings 
§§ 7 & 8 — SELLING AND DELIVERING CANNAB IS OR MEDICAL 
MARIJUANA  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 2 	5/2/24 
 
Beginning October 1, 2024, allows municipalities to apply for a court order to take certain 
merchandise from stores that violate the cannabis or medical marijuana sales and delivery 
law; makes violations CUTPA violations and adds additional penalties 
§ 9 — BACKER EXCEPTION 
Allows an equity joint venture to share an individual owner with another equity joint 
venture that meets social equity applicant criteria if the individual owner is a backer for 
certain social equity cultivators 
§§ 10 & 18 — PRODUCT PACKAGER EXPANDED A CTIVITIES 
Allows a product packager to expand its authorized activities to include the authorized 
activities of a product manufacturer 
§§ 12 & 15 — TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING CHANGES 
Makes various technical and conforming changes 
§ 13 — SOCIAL EQUITY CULTIVATORS, STATE-RECOGNIZED 
TRIBAL LAND, AND OUTDOOR CULTIVATION 
Allows certain social equity cultivator applicants to locate (1) a facility on a state 
recognized tribe’s reservation or land or (2) an exclusively outdoor grow facility outside a 
disproportionately impacted area if it is in a municipality that has one; prohibits DCP 
from granting an application for certain social equity provisional cultivator licenses after 
December 31, 2025 
§§ 14 & 21 — STORING CANNABIS 
Deems a location to be secure for storing cannabis if it satisfies the requirements for 
securing certain controlled substances 
§§ 16 & 17 — CERTAIN MANUFACTURERS GETTI NG CANNABIS 
Allows a product manufacturer and food and beverage manufacturer to get cannabis from 
the places it is already allowed to sell, transfer, or transport to 
§ 19 — PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT 
Expands “project labor agreements” to include affiliated business entities and labor 
organizations; allows the court to issue penalties for affiliated business entities for project 
labor agreement violations 
§ 20 — PACKAGING AND SIGNAGE 
Allows edible cannabis products to be packaged for multiple servings under certain 
requirements; requires DCP to establish disclosures for mold and yeast and signage for 
mold and their remediation practices 
§ 22 — ADVERTISING 
Generally prohibits cannabis establishments from advertising or marketing a discounted 
price or other promotional offer to buy cannabis; allows a discounted price or promotion 
within a dispensary facility, retailer, or hybrid retailer building, or through a delivery 
service to induce cannabis purchases 
§ 24 — SUMMARILY SUSPENDING CERTAIN CREDENTIALS 
Expands the DCP and revenue services commissioners’ powers to summarily suspend a 
credential for any violation of the laws on manufacturer hemp, cannabis tax, marijuana 
and controlled substances tax, medical marijuana, and adult-use cannabis  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 3 	5/2/24 
 
§ 24 — MANUFACTURER HEMP PRODUCTS 
Specifies out-of-state licensees may apply for a DCP manufacturer hemp license; increases 
various fines; removes certain manufacturer hemp product violations from being CUTPA 
violations; requires a police training bulletin to be done annually; specifies that hemp that 
is lawfully produced under federal law may be transported or shipped through the state 
§ 25 — FOOD AND BEVERAGE MANUFACTURER TR ACKING HEMP 
Requires food and beverage manufacturers to track third-party purchases of hemp or hemp 
products 
§ 36 — CONSUMER PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT A CCOUNT 
Requires the DCP commissioner to provide OAG with funds from the consumer 
protection enforcement account to pay for OAG’s expenses for enforcing the law on selling 
and delivering cannabis or medical marijuana 
BACKGROUND 
 
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes various changes to the laws on adult-use cannabis, 
hemp, and medical marijuana as summarized in the section-by-section 
analysis below. It also makes various other minor, technical, and 
conforming changes. 
*House Amendment “A” (1) removes provisions from the underlying 
bill on social equity applicants partnering with hemp producers, 
transporter licenses, hemp manufacturers, and dispensary or hybrid 
retailer relocations; (2) adds provisions redefining certain terms (e.g., 
cannabis and marijuana), moderate THC-hemp products, and project 
labor agreements; (3) makes revisions to the provisions on high-THC 
thresholds and infused beverages, including requiring licensure for 
manufacturers, adding legacy infused beverages and package store 
endorsements, and increasing the container fee amount; and (4) makes 
various minor, technical, and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2024, unless otherwise stated. 
§§ 1, 4, 6, 23 & 26-35 — INFUSED BEVERAG ES 
Establishes a new category of THC product, which it classifies as an “infused beverage” 
and requires it to meet many of the requirements for manufacturer hemp products; 
generally requires infused beverage manufacturers to be licensed; only allows certain 
cannabis establishments and package stores to sell these beverages; prohibits sales to 
anyone under age 21; sets various requirements for testing, signs, packages, and labels;  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 4 	5/2/24 
 
allows the sale of “legacy infused beverages” until September 30, 2024; imposes a $1 
assessment per container; makes it a CUTPA violation to violate certain provisions 
The bill establishes a new category of THC product, which it classifies 
as an “infused beverage” and requires it to meet many of the 
requirements for manufacturer hemp products. It prohibits sales of 
these beverages to anyone under age 21 and the beverages may only be 
sold at package stores or cannabis dispensary facilities, hybrid retailers 
(i.e., licensed to sell both recreational cannabis and medical marijuana), 
or retailers. 
The bill deems any violation of the manufacturing infused beverages 
provisions a Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) violation 
(see BACKGROUND). It also makes technical and conforming changes.  
Infused Beverages (§ 26) 
An “infused beverage” is a beverage that is not alcoholic; is intended 
for human consumption; and contains or is advertised, labeled, or 
offered for sale as containing, a total THC content of less than three 
milligrams (mg) per container that is at least 12 fluid ounces. It is not 
considered cannabis, marijuana, or a high-or moderate-THC product. 
Manufacturing (§ 27) 
License. Regardless of the law on manufacturing, cultivating, and 
storing hemp by certain cannabis establishments, the bill generally 
requires, on and after October 1, 2024, anyone who manufactures any 
infused beverage intended to be sold or offered for sale in Connecticut 
to have a Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) license. 
A person seeking an infused beverage manufacturer license must 
submit to DCP, in a commissioner-prescribed way, an application with 
a $5,000 application fee. Each license is valid for one year and must be 
renewed annually upon submitting a renewal application with a $5,000 
renewal fee. All fees are deposited in the consumer protection 
enforcement account. Under existing law, money from this account 
must be used to fund positions and other related expenses for enforcing 
DCP licensing and registration laws (also see § 36, below). 
Exemption. Under the bill, certain cannabis establishments may,  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 5 	5/2/24 
 
beginning October 1, 2024, manufacture infused beverages intended to 
be sold or offered for sale in the state with DCP approval. To do so, a 
cultivator, micro-cultivator, food and beverage manufacturer, product 
manufacturer, or a producer with expanded authorization must submit 
a written request to DCP for the department’s approval. 
The cannabis establishments that receive DCP approval are subject to 
all of the bill’s infused beverage provisions and all regulations and 
policies and procedures adopted that are applicable to infused beverage 
manufacturers, except they are not subject to the license requirement. 
Hemp. The bill requires, beginning October 1, 2024, infused beverage 
manufacturers to obtain hemp oil under certain conditions for the 
purpose of manufacturing infused beverages. The hemp oil must: 
1. be derived from hemp; 
2. have been extracted from hemp grown by certain individuals (see 
below); and 
3. have been extracted from hemp by using a (a) Class 3 residual 
solvent within the meaning of the most recent United States 
Pharmacopeia, (b) solvent generally recognized as safe under the 
federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or (c) DCP-approved 
solvent that is posted on the department’s website. 
The hemp oil must have been: 
1. extracted from hemp grown by a (a) hemp producer, as 
evidenced by a producer-issued certificate of authenticity or (b) 
licensed hemp grower regulated by a state, territory, or federally 
recognized Indian tribe, and in accordance with a state or tribal 
plan the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) approved, as 
evidenced by a grower-issued certificate of authenticity; or  
2. extracted (a) by a person who is actively credentialed by a state 
or federally recognized Indian tribe to extract hemp and (b) in a 
facility that a state or federally recognized Indian tribe 
credentials.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 6 	5/2/24 
 
Prohibitions and Requirements. Beginning October 1, 2024, the bill 
sets certain prohibitions and requirements for manufacturing infused 
beverages as described below.  
Prohibitions. The bill prohibits infused beverages sold or offered to 
be sold in the state: 
1. from including any additive that is psychotropic, or could 
increase the infused beverage’s potency, toxicity, or addictive 
properties, including caffeine other than those naturally 
occurring in chocolate, or total THC that exceeds three mgs per 
container; 
2. unless they meet (a) the laboratory testing standards for cannabis 
under the state’s cannabis law and the regulations and policies 
and procedures adopted under that law or (b) other DCP-
approved testing standards that are also posted on the 
department’s website; and 
3. from being packaged, labeled, or advertised in any way that is 
likely to mislead an individual by incorporating any statement, 
brand, design, representation, picture, illustration, or other 
depiction that (a) bears a reasonable resemblance to trademarked 
or characteristic packaging of cannabis offered for sale in the state 
by a cannabis establishment, or on tribal land by a tribal-
credentialed cannabis entity, or a commercially available product 
other than a cannabis product; or (b) appeals to individuals who 
are under age 21, by, among other things, making use of any 
spokesperson or celebrity who appeals to these individuals; 
depicting any individual who is under age 25 consuming 
cannabis or an infused beverage; including any object, such as a 
toy, character, or cartoon character, which suggests the presence 
of anyone under age 21; or making use of any other method that 
is designed to appeal to anyone under age 21. 
Manufacturer Requirements. The bill requires each infused 
beverage manufacturer that manufactures any infused beverage 
intended to be sold or offered for sale in the state to:  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 7 	5/2/24 
 
1. only manufacture beverages with total THC that does not exceed 
three mgs per container; 
2. manufacture beverages using equipment that is exclusively used 
to manufacture a beverage or prepared in accordance with good 
manufacturing practices set under federal law (21 C.F.R. Parts 
110 and 111); and 
3. ensure that all hemp oil the manufacturer possesses for 
manufacturing beverages is (a) stored in a secure, locked location 
separate from any cannabis, and (b) clearly and conspicuously 
labeled as hemp oil solely for use in manufacturing infused 
beverages, and (c) solely used for the purpose of manufacturing 
infused beverages. 
Testing. The bill also requires each lot of an infused beverage in its 
final form to be tested by a cannabis testing laboratory. A statistically 
significant number of samples must be collected from the lot and 
submitted for final product testing in a DCP-approved manner. The 
sampling and final product testing must be conducted by using a 
representative sample of the lot and by collecting a minimum number 
of sample increments relative to the lot size. 
Symbols. Under the bill, each infused beverage container sold or 
offered for sale in Connecticut must prominently display a symbol, in a 
size of at least one-half inch by one-half inch and be in a DCP-approved 
format, that indicates the beverage is not legal or safe for anyone who is 
under age 21. 
Sales. The bill requires infused beverage manufacturers to only sell 
infused beverages to a dispensary facility, hybrid retailer, retailer, or 
wholesale permittee or wholesale permittee for beer.  
Verification. For infused beverages manufactured in and regulated 
by another state, and by a person who is regulated as a food or 
nonalcoholic beverage manufacturer, the bill requires certain 
verifications before the beverages may be sold.   2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 8 	5/2/24 
 
Before the specified cannabis establishments sell to a consumer or a 
wholesaler sells to a package store, they must, based on a representative 
sample of the infused beverage containers included in the shipment, (1) 
verify that the included beverages satisfy the packaging, labeling, and 
advertising requirements above, and (2) for the purposes of preserving 
public health and safety, verify that the beverages in the shipment were 
manufactured with the requirements that are substantially similar to the 
bill’s infused beverage prohibitions and manufacturing, testing, and 
symbol requirements. In addition to making sure these requirements 
follow the bill’s provisions, they must also satisfy any implementing 
DCP regulations or policies or procedures. 
Gift Prohibition. The bill also prohibits cannabis establishments or 
infused beverage manufacturers, or their agents or employees, from 
gifting or transferring any infused beverage to a consumer for free as 
part of a commercial transaction. 
Documentation. The bill allows the DCP commissioner to request 
that an infused beverage manufacturer submit to DCP, in a way he 
prescribes, documentation sufficient to demonstrate the manufacturer 
is in compliance with the bill’s provisions. The manufacturer must 
promptly provide the requested documentation.  
Investigations and Enforcement. The bill subjects each infused 
beverage manufacturer to investigation and enforcement provisions of 
cannabis establishment licenses. By law, the DCP commissioner, for 
sufficient cause, may take certain disciplinary actions, including 
suspending or revoking a credential or issuing fines of up to $25,000 per 
violation, and accepting an offer in compromise (CGS § 21a-421p). 
Federal Conflict Report. Under the bill, if the DCP commissioner 
determines, after consulting the attorney general, that the federal 
Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 has been amended in a way that 
conflicts with these provisions, the commissioner must prepare and 
submit a report, in coordination with the attorney general, to the 
General Law Committee.  
The report must at least set the scope of the conflict and  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 9 	5/2/24 
 
recommendations for a resolution. The commissioner must submit the 
report (1) within 30 days after the USDA announces the amendment, if 
the General Assembly is in session, or (2) within 60 days after the 
announcement, if the General Assembly is not in session. 
Regulations, Policies, and Procedures. The bill allows the DCP 
commissioner to adopt regulations to implement these provisions. 
Before adopting the required regulations, the commissioner must issue 
policies and procedures to implement the bill’s provisions. These 
policies and procedures have the force and effect of law. 
At least 15 days before the policies and procedures take effect, the bill 
requires the commissioner to post them on DCP’s website and submit 
them to the secretary of the state (SOTS) to be posted on the 
eRegulations system. A policy or procedure is no longer effective once 
SOTS codifies the final regulation or, if the regulations have not been 
submitted to the Regulation Review Committee, July 1, 2028, whichever 
occurs earlier. 
Penalties. Under the bill, following a hearing conducted under the 
Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), the DCP commissioner 
may impose an administrative civil penalty of up to $5,000 per violation, 
and suspend, revoke, or place conditions on any infused beverage 
manufacturer that violates any of these provisions or any implementing 
regulation. All administrative civil penalties must be deposited in the 
consumer protection enforcement account. 
The commissioner may also summarily suspend, in accordance with 
the UAPA, any DCP credential that he has issued to a person who 
violates this provision. 
Under the bill, beginning July 1, 2024, anyone who violates these 
infused beverage provisions is deemed to have violated CUTPA. 
Retail Sales (§ 28) 
Age Requirement. Beginning July 1, 2024, the bill prohibits infused 
beverages from being sold or offered for sale to anyone under age 21. It 
does so by prohibiting a package store owner, agent, or employee;  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 10 	5/2/24 
 
dispensary facility, hybrid retailer, or retailer from selling these 
beverages without first verifying the individual’s age with a valid 
driver’s license or identification card. 
Sales and Sign Requirements. Under the bill, beginning October 1, 
2024, an infused beverage may only be sold and distributed if it is sold 
at a (1) package store that buys from a wholesaler, or (2) dispensary 
facility, hybrid retailer, or retailer. If sold at a dispensary, hybrid retailer, 
or retailer, the beverage must be stored and displayed separately from 
cannabis in the same way as manufacturer hemp products (i.e., 
displayed with a DCP-approved sign, clearly labeled to distinguish 
them as a different product, and subject to different testing standards). 
Standards. Infused beverages must also meet certain standards of 
manufacturer hemp products. These standards prohibit these beverages 
from: 
1. having any synthetic cannabinoid and 
2. being distributed or sold without certain packaging and labeling 
(e.g., scannable bar code and product expiration or best-by date 
if applicable). 
Indirect Sales. Beginning July 1, 2024, the bill prohibits infused 
beverages from being sold, or offered for sale, at retail to anyone in the 
state by any indirect means, including by mail, telephone, or other 
electronic means. 
Packaging and Labeling Requirements. Beginning October 1, 2024, 
the bill prohibits anyone from selling, or offering for sale, these 
beverages in any container containing less than 12 fluid ounces or in 
packages that have more than four containers.  
Penalty. Under the bill, anyone who violates these infused beverage 
provisions is deemed to have violated CUTPA. 
Legacy Infused Beverages (§ 30) 
The bill allows a dispensary facility, hybrid retailer, retailer, or  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 11 	5/2/24 
 
package store to sell legacy infused beverages until September 30, 2024, 
after receiving a DCP waiver. A “legacy infused beverage” is a beverage 
that (1) is not an alcoholic beverage, (2) is intended for human 
consumption, and (3) contains or is advertised, labeled, or offered for 
sale as containing, THC. The beverage must also, as of June 30, 2024, 
comply with the Responsible and Equitable Regulation of Adult-Use 
Cannabis Act (RERACA) and the corresponding DCP policies and 
procedures and regulations. 
Until June 30, 2024, the bill allows these cannabis establishments and 
package store permittees to submit to DCP, on a commissioner-
prescribed form, a waiver application to sell the legacy infused 
beverages they possess, including their inventory, until September 30, 
2024.  
A DCP waiver allows these cannabis establishments and package 
stores to sell legacy infused beverages they possess when the bill passes, 
as long as all sales are to individuals age 21 or older and in compliance 
with all applicable provisions of RERACA and implementing 
regulations and policies and procedures. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage  
Inventory (§ 29) 
The bill requires, beginning May 15, 2024, businesses, other than the                 
specified cannabis establishments above and package stores, to take 
certain actions before they are able to sell any infused or legacy infused 
beverages. They must, (1) by May 14, 2024, take inventory of the 
containers they own and possess, and (2) by June 15, 2024, submit to 
DCP, in a way the commissioner prescribes, a report with the inventory 
results and a fee of $1 per container in the inventory. 
Under the bill, a “business” means any individual or sole 
proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, trust, limited liability 
company, limited liability partnership, joint stock company, joint 
venture, association, or other legal entity through which business for 
profit or not-for-profit is conducted.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 12 	5/2/24 
 
If a business does not submit the report and pay the fee by June 15, 
2024, the commissioner must: 
1. make a good faith estimate, based on the information available to 
him, of the number of containers that the business owned and 
possessed on May 14, 2024; and 
2. invoice the business $1 per container based on the estimate. 
All fees DCP receives from these inventories must be deposited into 
the consumer protection enforcement account. 
Additionally, the DCP commissioner may, subject to the UAPA, 
revoke, place conditions on, or suspend any certificate, license, permit, 
registration, or other credential DCP has issued to any business that fails 
to submit the report and pay the fee before June 15, 2024. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage 
Package Store Endorsement (§ 33) 
The bill requires a package store permittee to annually pay DCP $500 
for an infused beverage endorsement, which the department must 
deposit in the consumer protection enforcement account.  
Container Assessment (§§ 6 & 35) 
The bill requires a $1 assessment on every infused and legacy infused 
beverage container sold that must be remitted to DCP every six months 
for certain public health and safety purposes. 
Under the bill, a cannabis establishment (i.e., dispensary facility, 
hybrid retailer, or retailer) and alcohol liquor wholesaler permittee or 
beer wholesaler permittee must assess this on each container sold. For 
cannabis establishments, it is on sales to a consumer. For wholesalers, it 
is on sales to a package store. These assessments are not subject to any 
sales tax or treated as income tax. 
The bill begins the required remittances on different dates, but 
requires they all occur every six months. For cannabis establishments, it 
begins October 1, 2024, and for wholesalers it begins January 2, 2025. For  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 13 	5/2/24 
 
both, they must remit payment to DCP for each infused beverage 
container sold during the preceding six months, and the funds must be 
deposited into the consumer protection enforcement account.  
§ 1 — MARIJUANA, CANNABIS, CANNABIS-TYPE SUBSTANCES, 
AND SYNTHETIC AND MA NUFACTURED CANNABINO IDS 
Narrows the definition of “marijuana” and “cannabis” by removing from the definition 
(1) the seeds and (2) synthetic cannabinoids; correspondingly deletes references to seeds in 
the “cannabis-type substances” definition; redefines “synthetic cannabinoids” by 
specifically excluding manufactured cannabinoids and redefines “manufactured 
cannabinoids” to specify how they are created rather than basing the definition on their 
natural structure or the effect they have 
Marijuana, Cannabis, and Cannabis-Type Substances 
The bill narrows the statutory definition of “marijuana” and 
“cannabis” by removing from the definition (1) the seeds and (2) 
synthetic cannabinoids, including in the exemptions. 
Under current law, the terms “marijuana” and “cannabis” have the 
same meaning, which is all parts of a plant or species of the genus 
cannabis, whether growing or not, and including its seeds and resin; its 
compounds, manufactures, salts, derivatives, mixtures, and 
preparations; high-THC hemp products, manufactured cannabinoids, 
and certain synthetic cannabinoids, except those not included below; or 
cannabinon, cannabinol, cannabidiol (CBD), and similar compounds 
unless derived from hemp, except CBD derived from hemp.  
Marijuana and cannabis do not include the following:  
1. a plant’s mature stalks; fiber made from the stalks; oil or cake 
made from the seeds; a compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, 
mixture, or preparation made from the stalks, except the 
extracted resin;  
2. sterilized seeds incapable of germination; 
3. hemp with a total THC concentration of up to 0.3% on a dry-
weight basis that is not a high-THC product;  
4. any substance the federal Food and Drug Administration 
approves as a drug and that is reclassified in any controlled  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 14 	5/2/24 
 
substance schedule, or that the federal Drug Enforcement 
Administration unschedules; or  
5. synthetic cannabinoids that the DCP commissioner designates as 
controlled substances and classifies in the appropriate schedule 
through regulations. 
The bill also makes conforming changes to the “cannabis-type 
substances” definition by correspondingly deleting references to seeds. 
Synthetic Cannabinoids 
The bill redefines “synthetic cannabinoid” to mean any substance 
converted by a chemical process to create a cannabinoid or cannabinoid-
like substance that has (1) structural features that allow interaction with 
at least one of the known cannabinoid-specific receptors and (2) any 
physiological or psychotropic response on at least one cannabinoid 
specific receptor. It includes hexahydrocannabinol (HHC and HXC) and 
hydrox4phc (PHC) but does not include manufactured cannabinoids, 
(see below).  
Under current law, “synthetic cannabinoid” means any material, 
compound, mixture, or preparation containing any quantity of a 
substance having a psychotropic response primarily by agonist activity 
at cannabinoid-specific receptors affecting the central nervous system 
that is produced artificially and not derived from an organic source that 
naturally contains cannabinoids, unless listed in another controlled 
substance schedule. 
Manufactured Cannabinoids 
The bill redefines “manufactured cannabinoids” to specify how they 
are created rather than basing the definition on their natural structure 
or the effect they have.  
Under the bill, “manufactured cannabinoids” mean cannabinoids 
created by converting one cannabinoid directly to a different 
cannabinoid through (1) the application of light or heat, (2) 
decarboxylation of naturally occurring acidic forms of cannabinoids, or 
(3) an alternate extraction or conversion process that DCP approves and  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 15 	5/2/24 
 
publishes on its website.  
Under current law, manufactured cannabinoids are cannabinoids 
naturally occurring from a source other than marijuana that are similar 
in chemical structure or physiological effect to marijuana-derived 
cannabinoids, but that are derived by a chemical or biological process. 
§§ 1, 31 & 32 — HIGH- AND MODERATE -THC HEMP PRODUCTS 
Simplifies the THC thresholds for when a product is considered a high-THC hemp product 
by imposing a uniform threshold regardless of the product type; establishes the category of 
“moderate-THC hemp product” and places various requirements on sales (e.g., only to 
those age 21 and above and only from cannabis establishments or places with a DCP 
certificate) and requires it to meet many of the requirements for manufacturer hemp 
products 
High-THC Hemp Products (§ 1) 
Beginning October 1, 2024, the bill simplifies the THC threshold for 
when a product is considered a high-THC hemp product and classifying 
it as marijuana or cannabis, subjecting it to various licensing and 
regulatory requirements (e.g., it must be sold only by licensed 
establishments, tested, and sold only to those age 21 or older except 
under the medical marijuana program). It does so by imposing a 
uniform THC threshold of one mg per-serving, with up to five mgs per-
container, or 0.3% on a dry-weight basis for cannabis flower or cannabis 
trim. 
Under current law, the thresholds are: 
1. for a hemp edible, topical, or transdermal patch: (a) one mg on a 
per-serving basis or (b) five mgs on a per-container basis; 
2. for a hemp tincture, including oil intended for ingestion by 
swallowing, buccal administration (i.e., between the gums and 
mouth cheek), or sublingual absorption (i.e., placing under 
tongue to dissolve): (a) one mgs on a per-serving basis or (b) 25 
mgs on a per-container basis;  
3. for a hemp concentrate or extract, including a vape oil, wax, or 
shatter (a type of cannabis extract): 25 mgs on a per-container 
basis; or   2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 16 	5/2/24 
 
4. for a manufacturer hemp product not described above: (a) one 
mg on a per-serving basis, (b) five mgs on a per-container basis, 
or (c) 0.3% on a dry-weight basis for cannabis flower or cannabis 
trim. 
Moderate-THC Hemp Product (§§ 31 & 32) 
The bill establishes the category of “moderate-THC hemp product” 
and places various restrictions on sales (e.g., only sold to those age 21 
and over). 
Beginning January 1, 2025, the bill only allows moderate-THC hemp 
products to be sold at a cannabis establishment or by a person who holds 
a DCP certificate of registration. A “moderate-THC hemp product” 
means a manufacturer hemp product, that has total THC of between 
one-half mg and five mgs, on a per-container basis. 
Certificate of Registration. A person seeking a certificate of 
registration as a moderate-THC hemp product vendor must submit to 
DCP, in a form and manner the commissioner prescribes, an application 
with a $2,000 non-refundable application fee. At a minimum, the 
application must disclose the place the person sells the moderate-THC 
hemp product and enough information for the DCP commissioner to 
determine if (1) in the preceding year, if at least 85% of the average 
monthly gross revenue generated at the existing location was from retail 
sales of moderate-THC hemp products to consumers or (2) it is 
reasonably likely that at least 85% of the average monthly gross revenue 
at the proposed location will be from retail sales of moderate-THC hemp 
products to consumers.  
The bill generally prohibits the commissioner from issuing the 
certificate unless he has determined that the applicant satisfies, or is 
reasonably likely to satisfy, the minimum sales threshold. However, the 
bill does not require a vendor to (1) meet the minimum sales threshold 
if it manufactures the products at its registered retail location or (2) 
disclose the information. The commissioner may issue a certificate to 
vendors that satisfy this criterion even if they do not satisfy the 
minimum sales threshold.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 17 	5/2/24 
 
Under the bill, the certificate must be renewed annually. Each vendor 
seeking renewal must submit a renewal application with a $2,000 
nonrefundable renewal application fee and the same sales information 
as required for the initial certificate. Except for certain vendors who are 
also manufacturers, DCP must only renew the certificate if the vendor 
meets the same minimum sales threshold. 
DCP must deposit these fees into the consumer protectio n 
enforcement account. 
Prohibitions. The bill prohibits:  
1. anyone from acting as or representing himself or herself as a 
vendor, unless the person actively holds a DCP certificate of 
registration; 
2. anyone selling these products that are intended for human 
ingestion in packaging that includes more than two containers;  
3. cannabis establishments or vendors, or their agents or 
employees, from gifting or transferring any product for free to a 
consumer as part of a commercial transaction; and 
4. cannabis establishments or vendors, or their agents or 
employees, from selling moderate-THC hemp products to 
anyone under age 21. (Before selling these products, they must 
first verify the individual’s age with a valid government-issued 
driver’s license or identity card to establish the person is age 21 
or older.) 
Standards, Testing, and Labeling. The bill requires all moderate-
THC hemp products to meet the same standards, testing, and container 
labeling as THC-infused beverages (see above). 
Investigations and Enforcement. Like infused beverage 
manufacturers, the bill subjects each moderate-THC hemp product 
vendor to the investigation and enforcement provisions of cannabis 
establishment licenses.   2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 18 	5/2/24 
 
Hearing and Penalty. After a hearing under the UAPA, the DCP 
commissioner may impose an administrative civil penalty of up to 
$5,000 per violation, and suspend, revoke, or place conditions on a 
vendor that violates the bill’s provisions or any related adopted 
regulation. Any administrative civil penalty collected must be deposited 
in the consumer protection enforcement account. 
Regulations. The bill requires the DCP commissioner to adopt 
regulations to implement these provisions. Before adopting the 
regulations and in order to implement these provisions, he may issue 
policies and procedures that have the force and effect of law. At least 15 
days before the policies and procedures take effect, the bill requires the 
commissioner to post them on DCP’s website and submit them to the 
secretary of the state (SOTS) to be posted on the eRegulations system. A 
policy or procedure is no longer effective once the final regulation is 
adopted or, if the regulations have not been submitted to the Regulation 
Review Committee, after July 1, 2028, whichever occurs earlier. 
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The bill adds unauthorized sales of 
moderate-THC hemp products as a prohibited act under the state 
Uniform Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Under the Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act, first violations are generally punishable by up to six 
months in prison, a fine of up to $500, or both. A subsequent violation 
is punishable by up to one year in prison, a fine of up to $1,000, or both 
(CGS § 21a-95). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2025, for the moderate THC-hemp 
product provisions. 
§§ 2 & 3 — MARIJUANA TESTING 
Requires each cannabis establishment to submit marijuana (i.e., cannabis) samples to a 
cannabis testing laboratory for testing; sets testing and retesting method standards and 
procedures 
Testing Samples 
The bill requires each cannabis establishment to submit marijuana 
(i.e., cannabis) samples to a cannabis testing laboratory for testing, as 
required by this provision. By law, a cannabis establishment is a 
producer, dispensary facility, cultivator, micro-cultivator, retailer,  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 19 	5/2/24 
 
hybrid retailer, food and beverage manufacturer, product 
manufacturer, product packager, delivery service, or transporter. 
Under the bill, a cannabis testing laboratory must test each marijuana 
sample for (1) microbiological contaminants, mycotoxins, heavy metals, 
and pesticide chemical residue and (2) an active ingredient analysis, if 
applicable. The microbiological testing must include, as a minimum, 
testing for the Aspergillus species, as set and posted on DCP’s website. 
(Presumably, DCP will set acceptable limits for all of these tests.) 
Testing Methods 
When conducting the microbiological testing, the marijuana sample 
must be tested using a molecular method that: 
1. includes quantitative polymerase chain reaction; 
2. is certified for identifying microbiological DNA; and  
3. is approved by the Association of Official Analytical 
Collaboration International, or a comparable national or 
international standards organization the DCP commissioner 
designates. 
The bill also allows alternative testing methods if DCP approves them 
and posts them on the department’s website. 
Repeat Testing After Failure 
Under the bill, if a sample does not pass the testing, the cannabis 
establishment that submitted the failing sample must repeat testing on 
the marijuana batch where the sample was taken, in a DCP-approved 
way. If the repeat test provides satisfactory results, the entire batch may 
be released for sale.  
The bill also allows a cannabis establishment to submit a remediation 
plan that is sufficient to ensure public health and safety to the 
commissioner and, if he approves it, the establishment may remediate 
the batch where the sample was taken and repeat the testing in a DCP-
approved way. If all the repeat testing provides satisfactory results, the  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 20 	5/2/24 
 
entire batch may be released for sale. 
Disposing of Batches 
If a cannabis establishment does not retest, or if repeat laboratory 
testing does not provide satisfactory results, the establishment must 
dispose of the entire marijuana batch where the sample was taken 
according to DCP commissioner-established procedures, as published 
on the agency’s website. 
Marijuana Batch Size 
The bill requires the maximum quantity and number of marijuana 
samples to be sufficient to ensure representative sampling of the 
corresponding batch size.  
§§ 5, 9, 11, 14 & 20 — MICRO-CULTIVATORS 
Allows certain social equity cultivator applicants to apply for a micro-cultivator license; 
eliminates the ability for a micro-cultivator to use its own employees to deliver cannabis; 
allows micro-cultivators to sell cannabis seedlings 
Social Equity Applicants (§§ 5 & 11) 
By law, DCP opened a three-month application period for social 
equity applicants to apply for a provisional and final cultivator license 
for a facility located in a disproportionately impacted area without 
participating in a lottery or request for proposals. 
The bill allows these social equity applicants to apply for a new 
micro-cultivator license without any partners. 
Application. Under the bill, between July 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025, 
a social equity applicant that had submitted an application for these 
cultivator licenses may withdraw the application and apply for a micro-
cultivator license. The applicant may do so if: 
1. the Social Equity Council verifies the applicant meets the social 
equity criteria, 
2. the applicant is eligible to receive a provisional cultivator license 
(e.g., passes criminal background check), 
3. DCP has not already issued a provisional cultivator license, and  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 21 	5/2/24 
 
4. the applicant submits an application to DCP with a written 
statement withdrawing the cultivation application. 
Withdrawals. The bill specifies that applicants that withdraw an 
application are not eligible for a refund on any fee connected to that 
application. 
Issuance of License. Between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2025, 
DCP must issue a provisional micro-cultivator license to a social equity 
applicant if he or she: 
1. meets eligibility criteria and submits a timely, completed 
application and other documentation required to determine 
eligibility under the social equity applicant process; 
2. submits a written statement disclosing whether any change in 
ownership or control has occurred since the applicant was 
verified by the Social Equity Council as a social equity applicant; 
and 
3. submits the $500,000 application fee. 
These application fees must be deposited into the consumer 
protection enforcement account. 
Changes to Social Equity Status. Under the bill, if the applicant 
provided a written statement on changes in ownership or control, then 
the Social Equity Council must determine if the changes are allowed 
under the laws and regulations governing its application review 
process.  
The council must determine whether the applicant continues to meet 
the social equity applicant criteria and submit to DCP a written notice 
disclosing its determination.  
License Renewal Fee. Under the bill, a renewal fee for a final micro-
cultivator license is the same as existing law (i.e., $1,000 for micro-
cultivators). These fees must be paid to the state treasurer to be credited 
to the General Fund.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 22 	5/2/24 
 
Equity Joint Venture. The bill prohibits social equity applicants that 
receive a micro-cultivator license from being eligible to apply for a 
provisional and final license to create more than one equity joint venture 
that the council approves. It also prohibits these applicants from 
operating the equity joint venture unless the applicant has received the 
new license, started cultivation activities, and submitted to DCP both 
the application fee and a conversion fee, which are both $500,000. The 
conversion fee must be deposited in the Cannabis Social Equity and 
Innovation Fund. By law, this fund may be used as access to capital for 
businesses, technical assistance for start-ups, workforce education and 
community investment funding, and paying costs for regulating 
cannabis (CGS § 21a-420f). 
Application Disclosure and Process. Like the provision allowing 
applicants to partner with hemp producers, the bill applies the same 
prohibition on application disclosure and requires submitted 
applications to be processed as other applications selected through the 
lottery. 
Delivery Service (§ 14) 
The bill eliminates the ability for a micro-cultivator to use its own 
employees to deliver cannabis. Under current law, a micro-cultivator 
may sell its own cannabis to consumers either through a delivery service 
or using its own employees.   
Seedlings (§§ 14 & 20) 
The bill allows a micro-cultivator, and no other cannabis 
establishment, to sell its own cannabis seedlings to consumers. But a 
micro-cultivator may only sell a seedling to a consumer if: 
1. the micro-cultivator cultivated the seedling in the state from a 
seed or clone; 
2. the seedling has a standing height of up to six inches measured 
from the base of the stem to the tallest point, does not contain any 
bud or flower, and has been tested for pesticides and heavy 
metals based on laboratory testing standards set by policies and  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 23 	5/2/24 
 
procedures and final regulations; and 
3. there is a label or informational tag on the seedling disclosing 
certain information. 
The bill requires the label or informational tag to include the 
following in legible English, black lettering, Times New Roman font, flat 
regular typeface, on a contrasting background, and in uniform size of at 
least one-tenth of one inch, based on a capital letter “K”: 
1. the micro-cultivator’s name; 
2. a product description for the seedling; 
3. one of the following chemotypes anticipated after flowering: 
“High THC, Low CBD,” “Low THC, High CBD,” or “50/50 THC 
and CBD”; 
4. the results of the required testing; 
5. directions for the optimal care of the seedling; 
6. unobscured symbols, in a size of at least one-half inch by one-half 
inch and in a DCP commissioner-approved format, where the 
symbols indicate the seedling contains THC and is not legal or 
safe for individuals under age 21; and 
7. a unique identifier that a cannabis analytic tracking generates 
and DCP maintains to track cannabis under policies, procedures, 
and final regulations. 
Exempts Seedlings From Child-Resistant Packaging and 
Creates Limit on Sales. The bill exempts micro-cultivators selling 
seedlings from having to sell them in child-resistant packaging. It also 
prohibits micro-cultivators from (1) selling more than three seedlings to 
a consumer in any six-month period and (2) accepting any returned 
seedlings.  
§§ 7 & 8 — SELLING AND DELIVERING CANNAB IS OR MEDICAL 
MARIJUANA  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 24 	5/2/24 
 
Beginning October 1, 2024, allows municipalities to apply for a court order to take certain 
merchandise from stores that violate the cannabis or medical marijuana sales and delivery 
law; makes violations CUTPA violations and adds additional penalties 
Municipal Prohibition 
By law, only certain specified cannabis establishments may sell or 
deliver adult-use cannabis to consumers and medical marijuana to 
patients or caregivers. 
Beginning October 1, 2024, the bill allows any municipality, by 
legislative vote, to prohibit any business from operating within the 
municipality if the business (1) is found to be illegally selling, offering, 
or delivering cannabis or (2) poses an immediate threat to public health 
and safety (see below). 
If a municipality’s chief executive officer determines that a business 
in the municipality is operating (i.e., offering sales of goods and services 
to the general public, including through indirect sales) in this way, he 
or she may apply to Superior Court for an order to take certain 
merchandise from the business. If the Superior Court finds that a 
business is in violation or poses a threat, then it may issue an ex parte 
(i.e., only one party involved) order without a hearing directing the 
municipality’s chief law enforcement officer to take possession and 
control of merchandise related to the violation or immediate threat to 
public health and safety. These items include any cannabis or cannabis 
product; any cigarette, tobacco, or tobacco product; any merchandise 
related to these products; and any proceeds related to these products 
and merchandise. 
Under the bill, “immediate threat to public health and safety” 
includes the presence of any (1) cannabis or cannabis product in 
connection with any law on selling, offering, or delivering cannabis, or 
(2) cigarette or tobacco product alongside any cannabis or cannabis 
product. 
Penalties 
Beginning October 1, 2024, under the bill, a violation of the law on 
selling, offering, or delivering cannabis is deemed a CUTPA violation.   2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 25 	5/2/24 
 
Additionally, anyone who aids or abets these violations is assessed a 
$30,000 civil fine for each violation, where each day the violation 
continues is a separate offense. A person is not deemed to have aided or 
abetted a violation, unless he or she: 
1. was the owner, officer, controlling shareholder, or in a similar 
position of authority over a person who is prohibited from selling 
or offering cannabis and then sold or offered it in violation of 
these provisions; 
2. knew that the person was prohibited and still sold or offered the 
sale; 
3. gave substantial assistance or encouragement for the sale or offer 
of sale; and 
4. the person’s conduct was a substantial factor in furthering the 
sale or offer of sale. 
It also imposes a $10,000 civil fine for each violation by anyone who 
manages or controls a commercial property, building, room, space, or 
enclosure, in the person’s capacity as owner, lessee, agent, employee, or 
mortgagor, who knowingly makes the commercial area available for use 
in these violations. Each day a violation continues is a separate offense. 
Under the bill, only the attorney general, upon the complaint of the 
DCP commissioner or a municipality where the violation occurred, may 
assess any civil penalty or institute a civil action to recover any imposed 
civil penalties. If a municipality institutes a civil action to recover an 
imposed civil penalty, the penalty must be paid to the municipality first 
to reimburse it for the costs for instituting the action. Half of the 
remainder, if any, is paid to the municipality’s treasurer and half is paid 
to the state treasurer for deposit into the General Fund. 
Lastly, the bill specifies that it does not prohibit criminal penalties on 
anyone prohibited from selling or offering cannabis or cannabis 
products who does so.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2024, for the municipal prohibition  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 26 	5/2/24 
 
and penalties provision. 
§ 9 — BACKER EXCEPTION 
Allows an equity joint venture to share an individual owner with another equity joint 
venture that meets social equity applicant criteria if the individual owner is a backer for 
certain social equity cultivators 
Under current law, the Social Equity Council is prohibited from 
approving an equity joint venture applicant that shares any individual 
owner with another equity joint venture that meets the social equity 
applicant criteria. The bill makes an exception for an individual owner 
in their capacity as a backer for certain social equity cultivators. 
§§ 10 & 18 — PRODUCT PACKAGER EXPANDED A CTIVITIES 
Allows a product packager to expand its authorized activities to include the authorized 
activities of a product manufacturer  
The bill allows a product packager to expand its authorized activities 
to include the authorized activities of a product manufacturer under 
certain conditions. In order for this to happen the: 
1. packager must submit to DCP a completed license expansion 
application and a $30,000 application fee; and 
2. commissioner must authorize the packager, in writing, to 
perform the expanded activities of a product manufacturer. 
The bill requires a product packager that expands its authorized 
activities to comply with all the laws, regulations, policies, and 
procedures for product manufacturers. If there is a conflict between the 
packager requirements and the manufacturer requirements, the more 
stringent public health and safety standard prevails. 
Under the bill, the renewal fee for a product packager’s expanded 
authorization is $25,000. This renewal fee is instead of the product 
packager renewal fee, which is $25,000. 
§§ 12 & 15 — TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING CH ANGES 
Makes various technical and conforming changes 
The bill makes various technical and conforming changes.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 27 	5/2/24 
 
§ 13 — SOCIAL EQUITY CULTIVATORS, STATE -RECOGNIZED 
TRIBAL LAND, AND OUTDOOR CULTIVATION 
Allows certain social equity cultivator applicants to locate (1) a facility on a state 
recognized tribe’s reservation or land or (2) an exclusively outdoor grow facility outside a 
disproportionately impacted area if it is in a municipality that has one; prohibits DCP 
from granting an application for certain social equity provisional cultivator licenses after 
December 31, 2025  
By law, in order for a social equity applicant who applied for a 
cultivator license without participating in a lottery to get a final 
cultivator license, the applicant must provide evidence of certain 
information, including a right to exclusively occupy a location in a 
disproportionately impacted area where the cultivation facility will be 
located (CGS § 21a-420o).  
The bill also allows these applicants to provide evidence that they 
will locate (1) a facility on state-recognized tribal land or (2) an 
exclusively outdoor grow facility outside a disproportionately impacted 
area if it is in a municipality that has one. 
State Tribal Land 
Under the bill, the facility may be located on any reservation of the 
Schaghticoke, Paucatuck Eastern Pequot, or Golden Hill Paugussett 
tribes that includes at least 10 acres of contiguous land that was part of 
the reservation on July 1, 2024, or (2) on any land any state-recognized 
tribe owns in fee simple if the parcel is at least 10 acres of contiguous 
land and is in a municipality that contained a disproportionately 
impacted area before July 1, 2024. 
Under existing law, a disproportionately impacted area is a U.S. 
census track in the state that the Social Equity Council identifies using a 
statutory process. Additionally, the adult-use cannabis laws provide 
certain advantages to residents of disproportionately impacted areas 
(e.g., social equity applicants). And certain cultivators with social equity 
applicants could have received a license without participating in a 
lottery if they located their facilities in a disproportionately impacted 
area (CGS §§ 21a-420(48) & -420o). 
Outdoor Cultivation  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 28 	5/2/24 
 
Under the bill, an exclusively outdoor grow facility may be located 
outside of a disproportionately impacted area if the facility is in a 
municipality that has any portion of a disproportionately impacted area. 
The outdoor grow must be done on land the municipality has approved 
for agricultural or farming uses and all cultivation must comply with all 
regulations, policies, and procedures on outdoor cannabis cultivation. 
Provisional Cultivator License Prohibition 
Additionally, the bill prohibits DCP from granting an application for 
provisional cultivator licenses after December 31, 2025. 
§§ 14 & 21 — STORING CANNABIS 
Deems a location to be secure for storing cannabis if it satisfies the requirements for 
securing certain controlled substances 
By law, among other things, a cannabis establishment must store all 
cannabis in a way to prevent diversion, theft, or loss. Under the bill, a 
location is deemed to be secure if the location satisfies the state 
regulations for securing controlled substances (i.e., schedule III, IV, and 
V, which require storage in an approved vault, safe, or separate secure 
locked area, among other requirements) (Conn. Agencies Regs., § 21a-
262-4). 
§§ 16 & 17 — CERTAIN MANUFACTURERS GETTI NG CANNABIS 
Allows a product manufacturer and food and beverage manufacturer to get cannabis from 
the places it is already allowed to sell, transfer, or transport to 
Current law allows a product manufacturer and food and beverage 
manufacturer to sell, transfer, or transport its own products to a 
cannabis establishment, cannabis testing laboratory, or research 
program using its own employees or a transporter. The bill also allows 
these manufacturers to get cannabis from these places. 
§ 19 — PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT 
Expands “project labor agreements” to include affiliated business entities and labor 
organizations; allows the court to issue penalties for affiliated business entities for project 
labor agreement violations 
Existing law requires certain construction and renovation projects for 
the operation of a cannabis establishment to be subject to a project labor 
agreement. Under current law, a project labor agreement is an  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 29 	5/2/24 
 
agreement between a subcontractor or contractor and a cannabis 
establishment that binds them to certain conditions. The bill expands 
the agreement to include affiliate businesses and labor organizations. 
Under the bill, an agreement is a prehire collective bargaining 
agreement that is entered into by and between: 
1. a cannabis establishment or affiliate business entity (i.e., one that 
directly, or indirectly through intermediaries, is controlled by, or 
is under control with, a cannabis establishment); 
2. one or more contractors or subcontractors; and 
3. one or more labor organizations (i.e., exists for the purpose of 
collective bargaining or dealing with employers concerning 
grievances, employment terms or conditions, or other mutual aid 
or protection, but does not include a company union). 
Under the bill, the plan must also establish the terms and conditions 
of employment in connection with performance of a covered project 
(i.e., constructing or renovating a facility to operate a cannabis 
establishment, that is at least $5 million, and performed by or on behalf 
of a cannabis establishment, or an affiliated business entity). 
Under current law, an agreement binds all project contractors and 
subcontractors by making specifications in all relevant solicitation 
provisions and contract documents. The bill instead binds each affiliated 
entity, contractor, and subcontractor to follow the collective bargaining 
agreement terms by making specifications in all relevant solicitation 
provisions and contract documents concerning performance of the 
covered project. 
Additionally, under current law, an agreement must establish 
uniform employment terms and conditions for all construction labor 
employed on the projects. The bill instead specifies the terms and 
conditions to apply to construction labor employed in connection with 
performance of the covered project. 
The bill also makes various minor, technical, and conforming  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 30 	5/2/24 
 
changes. 
Employee Organization and Labor Organization 
Under current law, an employee organization may enforce the project 
labor agreement provisions or seek remedies for noncompliance. The 
bill instead allows a labor organization to take these actions. 
Under current law, an “employee organization” is any lawful 
association, labor organization, federation, or council with a primary 
purpose of improving wages, hours, and other conditions of 
employment for cannabis establishments’ employees.  
Civil Actions 
The bill allows a civil action to be brought in the Superior Court 
where the covered project is to be performed. Under current law, these 
actions may only be brought where the project is located. 
Current law allows the court, after holding a hearing, to order 
penalties of up to $10,000 per day for each project labor agreement 
violation by the cannabis establishment. The bill extends this to an 
affiliated business entity. 
Like under current law for a cannabis establishment, an affiliate 
business entity’s failure to comply with the project labor agreement 
provisions must not be the basis for any administrative action by DCP. 
§ 20 — PACKAGING AND SIGNAGE 
Allows edible cannabis products to be packaged for multiple servings under certain 
requirements; requires DCP to establish disclosures for mold and yeast and signage for 
mold and their remediation practices 
Under existing law, the cannabis-related regulations that the DCP 
commissioner must adopt must include specified labeling and 
packaging requirements. The bill modifies a few of these requirements 
and adds another. 
Edible Cannabis Packaging 
Current law requires packaging for edible cannabis products to be 
individually wrapped. The bill allows these products to be packaged for  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 31 	5/2/24 
 
multiple servings if each single standardized serving is easily 
discernable and is individually wrapped or physically demarked and 
delineated.  
Mold and Yeast 
Existing law requires DCP to set laboratory testing standards. The bill 
requires DCP to:  
1. establish consumer disclosures on mold and yeast in cannabis 
and allowed remediation practices and 
2. prescribe signage for dispensary facilities, retailers, and hybrid 
retailers to prominently display that discloses (a) possible health 
risks related to mold and (b) the use and possible health risks 
related to using mold remediation techniques. 
§ 22 — ADVERTISING  
Generally prohibits cannabis establishments from advertising or marketing a discounted 
price or other promotional offer to buy cannabis; allows a discounted price or promotion 
within a dispensary facility, retailer, or hybrid retailer building, or through a delivery 
service to induce cannabis purchases 
The bill generally prohibits cannabis establishments from advertising 
or marketing that includes a discounted price or other promotional offer 
as an inducement to buy cannabis or a cannabis product that is not 
medical marijuana. However, it allows a discounted price or 
promotional offering, as an inducement to purchase cannabis, (1) within 
a dispensary facility, retailer, hybrid retailer building; (2) through a 
delivery service; or (3) on the dispensary facility, retailer, or hybrid 
retailer’s website where cannabis or cannabis products may be lawfully 
ordered. 
§ 24 — SUMMARILY SUSPENDING CERTAIN CRED ENTIALS 
Expands the DCP and revenue services commissioners’ powers to summarily suspend a 
credential for any violation of the laws on manufacturer hemp, cannabis tax, marijuana 
and controlled substances tax, medical marijuana, and adult-use cannabis 
Under current law, the DCP and revenue services commissioners 
may summarily suspend any credential their respective department 
issues to anyone who violates certain provisions on selling 
manufacturer hemp products (e.g., selling hemp that contains synthetic  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 32 	5/2/24 
 
cannabinoid and failing to follow labeling or packaging guidelines). The 
bill expands the power to summarily suspend a credential to apply to 
any violation of the laws on manufacturer hemp, cannabis tax, 
marijuana and controlled substances tax, medical marijuana, and adult-
use cannabis. As under existing law, these suspensions must be done 
under the UAPA procedures for matters involving licenses. 
§ 24 — MANUFACTURER HEMP PRODUCT S 
Specifies out-of-state licensees may apply for a DCP manufacturer hemp license; increases 
various fines; removes certain manufacturer hemp product violations from being CUTPA 
violations; requires a police training bulletin to be done annually; specifies that hemp that 
is lawfully produced under federal law may be transported or shipped through the state 
Out-of-State Licensees Getting Connecticut License  
Existing law prohibits anyone from manufacturing hemp in 
Connecticut without a DCP license. But the bill specifies that the 
manufacturer hemp laws should not be construed to prohibit anyone 
who is licensed in another state to manufacture, handle, store, and 
market manufacturer hemp products from applying for or getting a 
DCP license. 
Fine Increase  
The bill increases the following fines, from: 
1. up to $2,500 to up to $5,000, for a manufacturer licensee who 
violates the manufacturer hemp law or regulations; 
2. up to $2,500 to up to $5,000, for any entity who manufactures in 
the state without getting a license or does so when its license is 
suspended; and 
3. $250 to $10,000, for anyone who manufactures in the state 
without a license or when the entity’s license is suspended or 
revoked, payable by mail to the Centralized Infractions Bureau 
without appearing in court. 
For the first two fines, a hearing conducted under the UAPA must be 
held first. 
CUTPA   2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 33 	5/2/24 
 
The bill removes certain manufacturer hemp product violations as 
CUTPA violations, which they are under current law. These include 
provisions allowing certain types of sales without a license, prohibiting 
synthetic cannabinoids, and requiring certain packaging and labeling 
for different manufacturer hemp products.   
Police Training Bulletin on High-THC Hemp Products  
Current law required the Department of Emergency Services and 
Public Protection, in consultation with DCP, to publish a training 
bulletin by October 31, 2023, informing local law enforcement agencies 
and officers of the investigation and enforcement standards for cannabis 
and high-THC hemp products. The bill makes this an annual 
requirement with the same October 31 deadline. 
Hemp Transportation  
The bill specifies that nothing in the state hemp laws should be 
construed to prohibit any hemp shipment or transport through the state 
if it was lawfully produced under federal law. 
The federal law allowing hemp explicitly prohibits states from 
prohibiting the transportation or shipment of hemp or hemp products 
produced in accordance with federal law through the state (P. L. 115-
334, § 10114(b)). 
§ 25 — FOOD AND BEVERAGE MANUFACTURER TRACKI NG 
HEMP 
Requires food and beverage manufacturers to track third-party purchases of hemp or hemp 
products 
As under existing law for certain cannabis establishments, the bill 
requires that hemp or hemp products purchased by a food and beverage 
manufacturer from a third party be tracked as a separate batch 
throughout the manufacturing process. Once the manufacturer receives 
the hemp or hemp product, it is deemed cannabis and the licensee must 
comply with all the cannabis laws and regulations. Manufacturers must 
keep a copy of the certificate of analysis for the purchased hemp or 
hemp products and the invoice and transport documents that show the 
quantity purchased and date received.  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 34 	5/2/24 
 
§ 36 — CONSUMER PROT ECTION ENFORCEMENT ACCOUNT 
Requires the DCP commissioner to provide OAG with funds from the consumer 
protection enforcement account to pay for OAG’s expenses for enforcing the law on selling 
and delivering cannabis or medical marijuana 
The bill requires the DCP commissioner, upon the attorney general’s 
request, to execute an agreement with the attorney general to provide 
the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) with funds from the consumer 
protection enforcement account as the commissioner and attorney 
general agree OAG needs to pay for personal services and other 
enforcement expenses incurred by the office in enforcing the law on 
selling and delivering cannabis or medical marijuana (CGS § 21a-420c). 
BACKGROUND 
CUTPA 
By law, CUTPA prohibits businesses from engaging in unfair and 
deceptive acts or practices. It allows the DCP commissioner to issue 
regulations defining an unfair trade practice, investigate complaints, 
issue cease and desist orders, order restitution in cases involving less 
than $10,000, enter into consent agreements, ask the attorney general to 
seek injunctive relief, and accept voluntary statements of compliance. It 
also allows individuals to sue. Courts may issue restraining orders; 
award actual and punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s 
fees; and impose civil penalties of up to $5,000 for willful violations and 
up to $25,000 for a restraining order violation. 
Related Bills 
sHB 5235, as amended by House “A,” has substantially similar 
provisions (1) redefining “cannabis,” “marijuana,” “synthetic 
cannabinoids,” and “manufactured cannabinoids”; (2) allowing 
multiple-serving edibles; and (3) specifically allowing the transport of 
hemp through the state if it was lawfully produced under federal law.  
sHB 5236 (File 103), favorably reported by the General Law 
Committee, among other things, allows DCP to impose a civil penalty 
of up to $5,000 for CUTPA violations, after an administrative hearing. 
COMMITTEE ACTION  2024HB-05150-R010646-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 35 	5/2/24 
 
General Law Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 21 Nay 1 (03/12/2024) 
 
Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 32 Nay 15 (04/29/2024)