Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05216

Introduced
2/22/24  
Introduced
2/22/24  
Report Pass
3/8/24  
Refer
2/22/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Report Pass
3/8/24  
Report Pass
3/8/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Refer
3/27/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/27/24  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Safety Capacity At Gardner Lake State Park.

Impact

The introduction of this bill is expected to enhance public safety measures at Gardner Lake State Park by preventing overcrowding, which is essential for ensuring safe supervision of visitors. The stipulations for assessing capacity will likely lead to a more organized flow of park patrons while also considering local traffic implications. By instituting these measures, the bill aims to mitigate risks associated with high visitor numbers, especially concerning the safe management of swimming areas and emergency response accessibility.

Summary

House Bill 05216, titled 'An Act Concerning The Safety Capacity At Gardner Lake State Park', focuses on establishing a safety capacity limit for the park. The bill mandates the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection to devise and publish this capacity limit by January 31, 2025. This determination will consider various factors including the number of visitors that can be safely managed, staff availability, parking capacity, restroom facilities, and the impact of traffic from visitors on nearby roads, especially those lacking sidewalks. Additionally, the Commissioner is authorized to collaborate with local law enforcement to enhance public safety through effective traffic management at the site.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 05216 appears positive, with strong support for increased public safety measures at state parks. Stakeholders recognize the importance of maintaining a balance between accessibility for visitors and safety protocols. However, there may be concerns among certain groups about the potential limitations this bill imposes on park access, particularly during peak visitation times. Legislative discussions may reflect a general understanding of the need for regulations that safeguard public well-being in natural spaces.

Contention

While the bill has received favorable votes, it may still face contention regarding its implementation and impact on visitor experience. Some lawmakers or community members may argue against the practicality of enforcing these capacity limits, particularly during busy seasons. Others might raise concerns over the effectiveness of traffic control measures proposed by the bill in managing increased vehicular flow to the park. Nevertheless, the emphasis on safety as a priority remains a unifying theme in the legislative discourse surrounding this proposal.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.