An Act Concerning The Development Of Middle Housing.
With an effective date set for October 1, 2024, the bill will amend existing laws to encourage jurisdictions to adopt regulations that facilitate the as-of-right development of middle housing. Municipalities that implement these regulations will earn housing unit-equivalent points for each unit that receives a certificate of occupancy. This is substantive as it not only incentivizes local authorities but also aims to increase the state's housing stock in response to an ongoing housing crisis that affects affordability and availability in numerous communities.
House Bill 05335 addresses the development of middle housing in Connecticut, specifically aiming to streamline the zoning regulations that surround such developments. The bill proposes that any lot allowing for residential or commercial use must permit middle housing developments as of right, without the typical requirement for public hearings or special permits. This approach seeks to simplify the process for municipalities to approve duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, and other housing types classified under middle housing, which emphasizes the state's commitment to increasing affordable housing options.
Public sentiment surrounding HB 05335 appears largely supportive, with advocates highlighting its potential to alleviate housing shortages and promote diverse living options in suburban communities. However, there are concerns among certain community members and local governments regarding the loss of autonomy in local planning and the fear of overdevelopment without appropriate community input. Overall, the bill represents a significant step towards addressing housing issues while balancing state oversight with local governance.
The primary point of contention revolves around maintaining local control versus increasing state mandates on housing development. Critics argue that while the intentions of the bill are noble, they may undermine the unique needs of communities which are best understood by local officials and residents. This tension reflects a larger debate on how to effectively manage growth and development in ways that respect local contexts while pushing for broader state-wide housing solutions.