Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05338

Introduced
2/28/24  
Introduced
2/28/24  
Report Pass
3/14/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Refer
3/25/24  
Report Pass
3/14/24  
Refer
3/25/24  
Refer
3/25/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/15/24  
Report Pass
4/15/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Engrossed
5/6/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Engrossed
5/6/24  
Passed
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/6/24  
Chaptered
5/20/24  
Passed
5/8/24  
Passed
5/8/24  
Enrolled
5/29/24  
Chaptered
5/20/24  
Chaptered
5/20/24  
Passed
6/5/24  
Enrolled
5/29/24  
Enrolled
5/29/24  
Passed
6/5/24  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Kirklyn M. Kerr Program.

Impact

If executed, the bill could significantly influence higher education in Connecticut by potentially re-establishing the Kirklyn M. Kerr program. This aligns with the broader goals of enhancing veterinary education within the state, responding to the demand for veterinary professionals. The initiative may not only benefit the university and its students but also local economies that rely on veterinary services, particularly in rural areas where animal health care is crucial.

Summary

House Bill 05338, also known as the Act Concerning the Kirklyn M. Kerr Program, is legislation that mandates the University of Connecticut to assess the feasibility of restarting a veterinary medicine program that was previously established. This program, aimed at providing veterinary education, comes with expectations for the University to evaluate its costs and potential benefits thoroughly. The findings of this feasibility study are to be reported to specified legislative committees by January 1, 2025, ensuring legislative oversight and community interest.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05338 appears to be supportive, particularly among constituents who advocate for improved educational opportunities in veterinary medicine. There is a general acknowledgment of the importance of such programs to meet the growing demand for trained veterinarians. However, there may also be concerns regarding funding and resource allocation given the economic implications of restarting a program of this nature.

Contention

One notable point of contention lies in the program's feasibility and associated costs, which will be presented to the legislature. Critics may argue about the use of state funds for higher education initiatives without clear benefits or necessary outcomes. The need for rigorous evaluation and community input will be essential to address any concerns regarding the budget and resources needed for the prospective veterinary program.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.