Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05447

Introduced
3/7/24  
Introduced
3/7/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Engrossed
5/6/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Engrossed
5/6/24  
Report Pass
5/6/24  

Caption

An Act Exempting The Residential Addresses Of Employees Of The Office Of The Attorney General From Disclosure Under The Freedom Of Information Act.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5447 would strengthen the privacy protections for employees of the Attorney General's Office by preventing the public release of their home addresses. This would align their privacy rights with those of other high-risk public employees. The bill is poised to affect how the Freedom of Information Act is applied in the state, particularly in relation to government employee privacy, which has become a critical concern for public agencies and their staff.

Summary

House Bill 5447 aims to amend the Freedom of Information Act to exempt the residential addresses of employees of the Office of the Attorney General from public disclosure. This legislation seeks to enhance the privacy and safety of these government employees, recognizing the potential risks associated with their positions. The bill intends to provide similar protection to those already afforded to other key public servants, such as judges and law enforcement officers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5447 appears to be largely supportive among those concerned with employee safety and privacy. Advocates of the bill argue that protecting the residential details of Attorney General employees is a necessary precaution against potential threats that can arise from their professional duties. However, some critics may express concerns regarding the overarching implications of privacy exemptions and their potential impact on transparency within public service.

Contention

The notable points of contention related to HB 5447 include discussions around public access to information versus the need for privacy in sensitive positions. While proponents highlight the importance of safeguarding individuals working in the judiciary and law enforcement, opponents may question whether such exemptions might lead to excessive secrecy. The balance between ensuring government transparency and protecting the rights of individual employees remains a crucial point of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.