Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00292

Introduced
2/29/24  
Introduced
2/29/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Report Pass
5/3/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Passed
5/7/24  
Report Pass
5/3/24  
Report Pass
5/3/24  
Chaptered
5/17/24  
Passed
5/7/24  
Enrolled
5/21/24  
Chaptered
5/17/24  
Chaptered
5/17/24  
Passed
6/5/24  
Enrolled
5/21/24  
Enrolled
5/21/24  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Pfas In Certain Products.

Impact

The bill represents a robust effort to strengthen environmental protection and consumer safety by limiting the presence of PFAS in everyday products. It creates a PFAS Testing account to support grants for municipalities to test drinking water for PFAS contamination. Additionally, the bill mandates labeling for products made with PFAS, enhancing transparency and consumer awareness. This aims to empower consumers to make informed decisions and potentially reduce exposure to harmful substances, aligning state regulations with public health priorities.

Summary

Substitute Senate Bill No. 292, also known as the Act Concerning The Use Of PFAS In Certain Products, establishes stringent regulations on products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Effective from October 1, 2024, the bill prohibits the manufacture and sale of numerous types of products including apparel, cleaning products, and cookware containing PFAS, with further regulations coming into effect between 2026 and 2028. The aim of the legislation is to mitigate public health risks associated with PFAS exposure, given its classification as harmful chemicals that pose significant environmental and health challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill SB00292 is largely supportive among environmental advocates and public health officials, who view it as a vital step towards reducing the health risks associated with PFAS. However, concerns have been raised by industry representatives about the potential economic impact of such stringent regulations. Opponents argue that the timelines for compliance may be challenging for manufacturers, and that further clarification on the definitions and scope of products affected is necessary for smooth implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definitions and scope of 'intentionally added PFAS' and how manufacturers will comply with the notification requirements. Some stakeholders are concerned that the bill may impose a heavier burden on small businesses and manufacturers due to the compliance procedures required to prove PFAS levels in products. Additionally, exempting certain classes of products could result in ambiguity regarding enforcement and compliance, which may lead to inconsistencies in market regulation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00837

An Act Concerning The Use Of Perfluoroalkyl Or Polyfluoroalkyl Substances In Class B Firefighting Foam.

NJ S4367

Establishes requirements and prohibitions for sale and distribution of certain products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

NJ A5600

Establishes requirements and prohibitions for sale and distribution of certain products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

CT SB00926

An Act Concerning The Presence Of Pfas In Certain Consumer Packaging.

CT HB07200

An Act Prohibiting The Sale Of Cigarettes, Tobacco Products, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems And Vapor Products To Persons Under Age Twenty-one.

CT HB06526

An Act Concerning Children's Products And Chemicals Of High Concern.

CT SB00326

An Act Concerning The Sale Of Certain Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems, Vapor Products, Cigarettes And Tobacco Products.

NH HB1649

Relative to prohibiting certain products with intentionally added PFAS and relative to civil actions for PFAS contamination, and relative to settlement of lawsuits against manufacturers of PFAS for impacts to public drinking water systems.