Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Mark Stuart And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.
Impact
The approval of SJ00173 will lead to a re-examination of the claim by the Claims Commissioner, who will conduct a hearing to determine the appropriate compensation amount for Stuart. This process aligns with the legislative provisions outlined in section 54-102uu of the general statutes, which governs compensation for wrongful imprisonment cases. The resolution could set a precedent for similar cases in the future, reinforcing the mechanism for state accountability regarding wrongful actions against individuals.
Summary
SJ00173 is a resolution that vacates a prior decision made by the Claims Commissioner denying a claim against the state by Mark Stuart. The General Assembly determined that Stuart was wrongfully incarcerated for thirty days, thus entitling him to compensation under Connecticut's statutes regarding wrongful imprisonment. This bill emphasizes the state's responsibility to provide recourse for individuals wrongfully detained.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SJ00173 appears to be positive, as the resolution seeks to rectify a past injustice against Stuart by officially acknowledging the wrongful incarceration. The unanimous vote in favor of the bill (149 yeas and 0 nays) reflects a bipartisan agreement on the need for justice and compensation for those affected by wrongful convictions. This sentiment underscores a collective recognition of the importance of addressing and preventing wrongful imprisonments.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding SJ00173 include the implications of state accountability and the potential financial burden on the state for compensating wrongful incarceration cases. Critics may voice concerns about the procedures for determining compensation and the criteria for claims submission. However, the general consensus appears to focus more on the necessity of correcting past wrongs rather than debating the financial aspects, making this resolution primarily about justice for individuals wrongfully affected by the state.
Resolution Vacating Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner Involving Claims Against The State Of Certain Claimants And Remanding Those Claims To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.
Resolution Vacating Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claims Against The State Of Certain Claimants And Remanding Those Claims To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Kimberly R. Rice And Authorizing The Claimant To Sue The State.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Susan Cardinal And Authorizing The Claimant To Sue The State.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jean Barjon And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Haydee Silva And Remanding The Matter To The Office Of The Claims Commissioner For A De Novo Hearing On The Merits.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Dwight Otis And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Renei Stone And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Derrick J. Taylor And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.