An Act Concerning Mobile Manufactured Home Parks.
The proposed legislation increases the obligations placed on mobile manufactured home park owners, enhancing the security and rights of residents. The requirement for prior written notice before a park owner can terminate a rental agreement, coupled with mandated relocation assistance, supports residents' stability. Additionally, this bill could potentially shift the balance of power towards protecting residents' rights, challenging previous practices that favored park management without considering tenant welfare. The focus on consumer protection aims to create a safer environment for residents and holds park owners accountable for their responsibilities.
House Bill 05428 aims to enhance the protections for residents of mobile manufactured home parks by introducing more rigorous requirements for park owners. Among its provisions, the bill requires park owners to provide relocation assistance to residents when their homes need to be removed due to a change in land use. This assistance is set at three different tiers based on the date of the notice received, with a maximum payout of $20,000. The bill’s implementation is effective from October 1, 2025, ensuring that residents receive fair treatment during significant changes that affect their housing situation.
The sentiment surrounding HB 05428 appears to be largely positive among advocates for homeowners and tenant rights, who view the bill as a proactive measure to secure housing stability for vulnerable populations. Advocates argue that the bill provides essential support for residents facing displacement and promotes fairness within the mobile home park system. However, there may be some contention from park owners who could perceive the increased regulations as burdensome, potentially leading to pushback from those who prioritize business freedoms over stringent tenant protections.
Notably, there are concerns from some stakeholders regarding the financial implications of the mandated relocation assistance. Critics may highlight the potential burden on mobile home park owners to comply with the new financial obligations, arguing that such costs might lead to increased rents or park closures. Balancing the rights of residents with the operational realities of park management may emerge as a significant point of contention as the bill progresses through the legislative process.