Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06873

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
4/2/25  

Caption

An Act Strengthening The Review Of Health Care Entity Transactions.

Impact

If passed, HB06873 would amend the general statutes related to the processes governing health care transactions. It proposes a more rigorous review process for certain large-scale transactions—such as mergers and acquisitions—requiring more extensive oversight from the Attorney General and the Office of Health Strategy. This measure seeks to not only prevent monopolistic behaviors within the health care market but also ensure that the interests of patients and service accessibility remain at the forefront of any health care structural changes.

Summary

House Bill 06873, also known as the Act Strengthening The Review Of Health Care Entity Transactions, is designed to modify and strengthen the existing regulatory framework requiring health care entities to undergo a certificate of need (CON) review for significant changes. The bill specifically emphasizes oversight of transactions involving health care facilities, including changes in ownership, mergers, and affiliations which may significantly affect service delivery and access to care. The main intention behind this legislation is to ensure that health care transactions maintain a focus on patient access, quality, and affordability, while also addressing potential antitrust issues that may arise from consolidations within the health care sector.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB06873 appears mixed. Supporters, likely including health care advocates and patient rights organizations, argue that the enhanced review processes would protect consumers and help maintain competitive health care landscapes. Conversely, opponents may contend that the additional regulations could stifle innovation and efficiency within health care organizations, discouraging beneficial reforms that come from larger affiliations or partnerships. Given the changes in how health care is delivered, discussions may reveal underlying tensions between regulatory needs and operational flexibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB06873 include concerns about the potential overreach of state oversight into the operational aspects of health care providers and facilities. Critics may argue that increased regulation might lead to inefficiencies, slowing down necessary changes within hospital systems to respond to patient needs and shifting demographics. Additionally, there are worries that the bill could inadvertently limit the capacity for health care entities to reorganize strategically, which could impact the overall quality and accessibility of services offered to the public.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB07224

An Act Expanding Liability Under The False Claims Act For Entities With An Ownership Interest And Prohibiting The Licensing Of Hospitals With Certain Lease Back Arrangements.

IL SB1998

HEALTH CARE CONSOLIDATION

VT H0071

An act relating to health care entity transaction oversight and clinical decision making

CA AB1415

California Health Care Quality and Affordability Act.

TX SB41

Relating to the demand for an accounting from an attorney in fact or agent of a principal by certain persons.

TX HB2918

Relating to statutory durable powers of attorney.

TX HB3095

Relating to durable powers of attorney and advance directives.

TX SB22

Relating to prohibiting certain transactions between a governmental entity and an abortion provider or affiliate of the provider.