Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07090

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
2/27/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/5/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Report Pass
6/3/25  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Timing And Scope Of Audits By The Auditors Of Public Accounts.

Impact

Should HB 07090 be enacted, it would significantly affect how state agencies are audited, creating a more stringent and systematic oversight framework across various public entities. The proposed bill would enable the Auditors of Public Accounts to tailor the frequency of audits based on the unique needs of each state agency, particularly in situations of prior violations or governance issues. This flexibility aims to increase public trust in state financial operations and enhance overall fiscal responsibility among state officials.

Summary

House Bill 07090 proposes to amend the existing statutes governing the Auditors of Public Accounts, focusing on the timing and scope of audits performed by the auditors. The bill stipulates that audits are to be conducted more frequently than biennially if necessitated by the joint standing committee of the General Assembly. It aims to ensure that auditors can examine the books and accounts of state departments and quasi-public agencies to maintain accountability and integrity in public finance management. By allowing independent auditors to assist, the bill seeks to enhance the efficiency and economic management of state resources.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment around HB 07090 appears generally supportive, particularly among those advocating for enhanced oversight and accountability in government functions. Proponents argue the bill would facilitate better scrutiny of state finances, reduce potential malpractices, and improve the public's perception of transparency in government. However, there could be concerns regarding the potential cost implications of more frequent audits, especially regarding resource allocation for state agencies. This aspect might create contention among fiscal conservatives who prioritize budget constraints.

Contention

Despite the positive reception generally, some legislators and stakeholders may argue against the additional scrutiny imposed on state agencies, believing it might impede operational efficiency or lead to bureaucratic delays in service delivery. Additionally, there is a potential contention regarding the balance between accountability and agency autonomy. The bill's requirement for more frequent reporting and compliance with specific audit timelines could lead to conflicts in resource management and operational priorities for certain agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.