Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07119 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/01/2025

                     
Researcher: MH 	Page 1 	4/1/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 7119  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE STATE FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE 
STATE FIRE SAFETY CODE, THE REPORTING OF IDENTIFYING 
INFORMATION, THE STATE BUILDING CODE, ORDERS OF 
BUILDING INSPECTORS AND LOCAL FIRE MARSHALS AND 
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes several changes to laws regarding the state building 
and fire codes and responsibilities for nonresident owners and 
landlords. Principally, the bill: 
1. requires Department of Emergency Services and Public 
Protection (DESPP) regulations on explosives, fireworks, 
pyrotechnics, and rockets to be consistent with the State Fire 
Prevention Code (§§ 1-4); 
2. increases the membership of the state fire marshal’s advisory 
committee to include two individuals suggested by DESPP’s Fire 
and Explosion Investigation Unit (§ 5); 
3. allows the DESPP commissioner to issue official interpretations 
of the State Fire Prevention Code, instead of only the state fire 
marshal being able to do so (§ 5); 
4. requires nonresident owners and certain federally contracted 
providers of rental real property in municipalities with 25,000 or 
more people to provide their identifying information to the town, 
and landlords to comply (§§ 6 & 7); 
5. increases potential fines for subsequent violations of (a) the State 
Building Code, State Fire Prevention Code, or Fire Safety Code or 
(b) ignoring a building inspector’s written order (§§ 8-10); 
6. modifies penalties for people who create fire hazards that  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 2 	4/1/25 
 
endanger life or property (§ 11); 
7. requires the State Building Code to be amended to (a) specifically 
allow the installation of elevators of a certain size in residential 
buildings with six or fewer floors and less than 25 residential 
units and (b) define certain terms related to temporary 
agricultural structures (§ 12); 
8. tasks the State Building Inspector and the Codes and Standards 
Committee (CSC) with creating and sharing a model ordinance 
with stricter energy-efficiency requirements than the State 
Building Code that supersede the code’s comparable 
requirements for municipalities that adopt the ordinance (§ 13); 
and 
9. requires age-restricted privately owned multifamily housing 
projects to have their elevators inspected at least once every 12 
months by a Department of Administrative Services (DAS) 
elevator inspector (§ 14). 
The bill also makes minor, technical, and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025, except the provisions on 
DESPP’s regulations and the state fire marshal are effective upon 
passage. 
§§ 1-4 — DESPP’S REGULATIONS FOR EXPLOSIVES, 
FIREWORKS, PYROTECHNICS, AND ROCKETS  
Existing law gives the DESPP commissioner regulatory authority 
over the use of explosives and blasting agents; fireworks; indoor 
pyrotechnics, sparklers, and fountains for special effects; supervised 
special effect displays with pyrotechnics or flame producing devices; 
and rockets propelled by rocket motors. 
The bill requires that the regulations concerning the use of these 
products be consistent with the State Fire Prevention Code. It also 
specifies that the commissioner has exclusive jurisdiction over them all, 
instead of only explosives and blasting agents as under current law.  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 3 	4/1/25 
 
§ 5 — STATE FIRE MARSHAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 
The bill expands the membership of the state fire marshal’s advisory 
committee from 9 to 11 members by including two individuals from a 
list DESPP’s Fire and Explosion Investigation Unit submits to the state 
fire marshal. By law, this committee coordinates with the state fire 
marshal on the State Fire Prevention Code’s adoption and 
administration. 
Currently, the committee consists of two individuals from a list of 
Codes and Standards Committee members that committee submits and 
the other seven represent local fire marshals, deputy fire marshals, and 
fire inspectors, selected from a list provided by the Connecticut Fire 
Marshals Association. By law, unchanged by the bill, the state fire 
marshal appoints the members to the committee. 
§ 5 — STATE FIRE PREVENTION CODE INTERPRETATION 
The bill allows the DESPP commissioner, instead of only the state fire 
marshal, to issue official interpretations of the State Fire Prevention 
Code, upon request.  
Correspondingly, the bill requires the commissioner to jointly 
compile, index, and publish the code interpretations with the state fire 
marshal, instead of the fire marshal doing this on her own. By law, these 
interpretations must be published at least quarterly.  
§§ 6 & 7 — NONRESIDENT OWNERS OR LANDLORDS OF RENTAL 
REAL PROPERTY 
The bill requires municipalities with a population of at least 25,000 
based on the most recent decennial census (“covered municipalities,” 
for this bill analysis) to require certain residential property owners and 
landlords to report specified information to the municipality, such as 
their current residential address. Existing law allows, but does not 
require, all municipalities to do so. 
The bill also requires the reports to covered municipalities to include 
other identifying information for the owner, landlord, or agent in charge 
of the building. Under current law, this requirement applies only to  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 4 	4/1/25 
 
certain individuals associated with a business entity that owns rental 
property. 
Additionally, under the bill, violators commit a violation punishable 
by a $250 to $1,000 fine, rather than an infraction. 
The bill adds complying with the modified reporting requirement to 
the law’s list of landlord responsibilities. Under existing law, (1) rental 
agreements cannot allow landlords to receive rent payments for any 
period during which the landlord is noncompliant with these 
responsibilities (CGS § 47a-4a) and (2) a tenant who claims that the 
landlord failed to perform his or her legal duties may generally bring an 
action in Superior Court to seek relief (CGS § 47a-14h).  
Municipal Landlord Identification Requirements  
Current law allows municipalities to require nonresident property 
owners and landlords renting to federal Housing Choice Voucher 
program participants (also known as “project-based housing providers” 
or PBHPs) to report certain information to the tax assessor or another 
designated municipal officer. This information must include the 
following:  
1. the owner’s or PBHP’s current residential address, if they are an 
individual, or 
2. the current residential address of (a) the agent in charge of the 
building and (b) each person who exercises day-to-day financial 
or operational control of the property (the “controlling 
participants”), if the owner or PBHP is a business entity that 
owns rental property in the state.  
For business entities, this report must also include identifying 
information for the controlling participants. 
Identifying Information and Nonresident Owners  
Current law does not define “identifying information,” but under the 
bill it is proof of a person’s name, birth date, current residential address, 
and driver’s license number or other government-issued identification  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 5 	4/1/25 
 
number. The bill also defines nonresident owner, which is a person (or 
entity) who does not live at the residential rental property and is either 
(1) an owner or (2) a controlling participant.  
Covered Municipalities 
Under the bill, covered municipalities must require nonresident 
property owners and PBHPs to report the information described above 
to them. For these municipalities, the bill also expands the reporting 
requirement to include accurate identifying information for the 
nonresident owner, PBHP, or agent in charge. Under current law, 
reports provided to a tax assessor on or after October 1, 2023, are exempt 
from disclosure under the state’s Freedom of Information Act. The bill 
makes these reports exempt regardless of when they were provided. 
Violations of Reporting Requirement 
Under the bill, a person who violates the reporting requirement 
discussed above commits a violation punishable by a $250 to $1,000 fine, 
rather than an infraction as under current law. (Infractions are 
punishable by fines, usually set by Superior Court judges, of between 
$35 and $90, plus a $20 or $35 surcharge and an additional fee based on 
the amount of the fine.) 
Existing law also allows municipalities to adopt an ordinance setting 
a civil penalty for violations of the reporting requirement. The penalty 
cannot exceed $500 for a first violation and $1,000 for subsequent 
violations. Anyone who is assessed a civil penalty may appeal to the 
Superior Court (CGS § 47a-6b).  
§§ 8-11 — BUILDING CODE AND FIRE-RELATED VIOLATIONS  
Increased Fines for Repeat Code or Building Inspector Order 
Violations 
Under current law, violations of the State Building Code, State Fire 
Prevention Code, and Fire Safety Code are punishable by a fine of $200 
to $1,000, up to six months in prison, or both. The same penalties apply 
for violating a building inspector’s written order to provide exit facilities 
or to repair, alter, or remove part of a building.  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 6 	4/1/25 
 
The bill increases the possible fine for subsequent violations to $500 
to $2,000, while keeping the same maximum prison term. 
As under existing law, fire code-related violations may also be subject 
to a fine of $50 per day for each day the violation continues. 
Increased Penalties for Fire Hazards 
Under current law, anyone who (1) stores combustible materials in a 
way that poses an increased fire risk to people or property; (2) creates 
an environment that poses a fire risk or would interfere with people 
exiting a premise in the case of a fire; or (3) violates any laws on fire 
prevention or safety can be fined up to $100, imprisoned up to three 
months, or both, and fined an additional $50 for each day the conditions 
remain at the premises.  
Under the bill, first-time violators can be fined up to $250 but are no 
longer subject to possible daily fines or imprisonment. Repeat violators 
are guilty of a class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by a fine up to 
$2,000 and up to 364 days in prison. 
§§ 12 & 14 — RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS 
The bill requires the next adopted version of the State Building Code 
to explicitly permit the installation of elevators large enough for two 
people, including one in a wheelchair, in residential buildings with (1) 
six or fewer floors and (2) less than 25 residential units. The bill also 
requires the next code revision to define “high tunnels” and “hoop 
homes” and classify them as temporary agricultural structures. 
Specifically, the state building inspector and CSC, with the DAS 
commissioner’s approval, must include these amendments in the next 
code update. 
Inspections (§ 14) 
The bill requires that all privately owned multifamily housing 
projects must have their elevators inspected at least once every 12 
months by a DAS elevator inspector. Following each inspection, the 
inspector must submit a report to the state building inspector that 
describes the status of (1) each elevator on the premises and (2) any  2025HB-07119-R000410-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MH 	Page 7 	4/1/25 
 
ongoing elevator repair, including how long any elevator is expected to 
remain inoperable. 
A privately owned multifamily housing project is a real property that 
is at least 15 stories tall, contains age restricted dwelling units, and is 
subject to a mortgage ensured under the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. § 1701). 
§ 13 — MODEL ENERGY -EFFICIENCY MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE 
The bill requires the state building inspector and the CSC, by July 1, 
2026, to create and share a model ordinance with stricter energy-
efficiency requirements than the State Building Code. In developing the 
ordinance, the inspector and committee must consider input from the 
public and those with interest in the matter. Municipalities can adopt 
the ordinance, and if they do, it supersedes the energy efficiency 
requirements in the building code.  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Public Safety and Security Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 29 Nay 0 (03/18/2025)