Connecticut House Bill HR00009

Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/31/25
• Report Pass: 4/7/25

Caption

Resolution Memorializing Congress To Amend The Jones Act To Exempt The Transportation Of Domestic Liquefied Natural Gas.

Impact

If passed, this resolution could significantly alter how liquefied natural gas is transported domestically. Currently, the lack of available Jones Act-compliant vessels means that the transportation of LNG is not only limited but also costly—reportedly increasing prices by up to 30%. By advocating for an exemption, the resolution seeks to enhance access to LNG, which constitutes a substantial part of the energy supply in both Connecticut and Puerto Rico, particularly as these regions rely heavily on natural gas for electricity generation.

Summary

House Resolution 00009 is a resolution urging Congress to amend the Jones Act to exempt the transportation of domestic liquefied natural gas (LNG) between U.S. ports. The Jones Act, established under the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, mandates strict regulations that require vessels transporting cargo between U.S. ports to be American-built, owned, and crewed. This legislation is proposed in light of unintended consequences that the Jones Act has had on states like Connecticut and territories such as Puerto Rico, particularly regarding their access to essential energy supplies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR00009 appears to be supportive among many lawmakers who view it as a necessary step to alleviate energy costs and improve access to vital resources. However, there may also be contention among those who highlight the importance of maintaining the Jones Act for national security and job preservation in maritime industries. The dialogue reflects a complex balancing act between local energy needs and broader economic strategies.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include concerns over potential implications for U.S. shipbuilding and maritime jobs if the Jones Act is amended. Supporters of the Act argue that it protects American jobs and military readiness, while proponents of the resolution emphasize the urgent need for economic relief through improved energy logistics. This debate showcases a clash between the priorities of energy accessibility and national maritime policy.