Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00002

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Refer
2/20/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/6/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Refer
5/8/25  
Report Pass
5/12/25  
Report Pass
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/14/25  

Caption

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

Impact

The bill is expected to have substantial implications for the state's regulatory landscape surrounding technology and AI. By instituting mandatory impact assessments and risk disclosures, SB00002 seeks to enhance transparency in AI applications and mitigate risks of algorithmic bias. The sentiment around the legislation aligns with a broad recognition that AI systems must be deployed responsibly, and companies must be held accountable for their technologies. Some industry advocates see this as a positive move towards fostering ethical AI practices, potentially leading to greater consumer trust and innovation, while others express concerns regarding compliance costs and potential bureaucratic burdens imposed on developers.

Summary

SB00002, titled An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence, establishes a regulatory framework for the deployment and management of artificial intelligence (AI) systems within the state. The bill focuses on addressing algorithmic discrimination and ensuring that high-risk AI systems are subject to impact assessments and risk management policies. A significant aspect of the bill is the requirement for developers and deployers to disclose specific information about AI systems and implement measures to mitigate adverse effects, particularly in public service sectors such as employment, education, and healthcare. The implementation of these provisions aims to protect consumers from potential risks associated with AI technology while promoting responsible use in the public and private sectors.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment surrounding SB00002 tends to be mixed. Advocates of consumer rights and ethical technology practices laud the proactive measures aimed at preventing discrimination and enhancing public accountability. Conversely, detractors, especially from the tech industry, raise concerns about the regulatory burden and restrictions that could hinder innovation. The ongoing dialogue among stakeholders highlights the balancing act policymakers face: ensuring consumer protection while fostering an environment conducive to technological advancement.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill relate to its requirements for thorough disclosures and assessments, which some argue may be excessive or impractical, especially for smaller businesses entering the AI market. Furthermore, skepticism also exists regarding how effectively such regulations could be enforced and whether they would indeed lead to meaningful changes in AI deployment practices. The tension between fostering innovation and imposing necessary safeguards continues to be a central theme in discussions around SB00002.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

VA HB2094

High-risk artificial intelligence; definitions, development, deployment, and use, civil penalties.

TX HB1709

Relating to the regulation and reporting on the use of artificial intelligence systems by certain business entities and state agencies; providing civil penalties.

VA HB2046

High-risk artificial intelligence; development, deployment, and use by public bodies, report.