Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00187

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Premium Rates On Long-term Care Insurance Policies.

Impact

One of the key provisions of SB00187 is the requirement for the state’s Insurance Department to hold a public hearing in cases where premium rate increase requests exceed ten percent. This legislative change aims to increase transparency and provide consumers with a platform to voice their concerns about significant price hikes, thereby promoting informed decision-making among policyholders. Additionally, insurance companies will be mandated to furnish prospective policyholders with explicit warnings regarding the risks of future premium rate increases at the point of sale.

Summary

SB00187, known as An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Premium Rates On Long-term Care Insurance Policies, intends to enhance the regulatory framework governing long-term care insurance in the state. The bill proposes several measures designed to protect consumers, notably those who have held policies for over twenty years, by evaluating alternative pools for these individuals. This focus on long-term policyholders speaks to the increasing concerns surrounding the sustainability and affordability of long-term care insurance as demographics shift toward an aging population.

Conclusion

Overall, SB00187 represents an effort to regulate long-term care insurance policies more stringently, providing both protections and obligations that aim to foster equitable treatment of consumers. The bill addresses urgent concerns in an evolving market, highlighting the ongoing discussion around the intersection of healthcare policy and insurance regulation in the face of changing demographic and economic landscapes.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational flexibility needed by insurance companies. Insurers may argue that heightened requirements for public hearings and advance notifications could introduce burdensome constraints on their ability to adjust rates in response to market dynamics. Conversely, advocates for consumer protection stress that such measures are essential for safeguarding the interests of vulnerable policyholders, especially as healthcare costs continue to escalate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.