Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | LCO No. 588 1 of 1 | |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 369 | |
6 | 6 | January Session, 2025 | |
7 | 7 | LCO No. 588 | |
8 | 8 | ||
9 | 9 | ||
10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY | |
11 | 11 | ||
12 | 12 | ||
13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
14 | 14 | SEN. SAMPSON, 16th Dist. | |
15 | 15 | ||
16 | 16 | ||
17 | 17 | ||
18 | 18 | AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF THE STATE FIRE SAFETY | |
19 | 19 | CODE RELATING TO METHODS OF EGRESS IN THE EVENT OF AN | |
20 | 20 | INTRUDER. | |
21 | 21 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
22 | 22 | Assembly convened: | |
23 | 23 | ||
24 | 24 | That the State Fire Marshal and the Codes and Standards Committee 1 | |
25 | 25 | study the provisions of the State Fire Safety Code relating to methods of 2 | |
26 | 26 | egress in the event of an intruder, including the use of a lock that 3 | |
27 | 27 | requires two releasing motions. 4 | |
28 | 28 | Statement of Purpose: | |
29 | 29 | To study the State Fire Safety Code as it relates to methods of egress in | |
30 | 30 | the event of an intruder, including the use of a lock that requires two | |
31 | 31 | releasing motions. |