Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01356 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/09/2025

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sSB-1356 
AN ACT CONCERNING DATA PRIVACY, ONLINE MONITORING, 
SOCIAL MEDIA, DATA BROKERS AND CONNECTED VEHICLE 
SERVICES.  
 
Primary Analyst: ME 	4/7/25 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
Consumer Protection, Dept. GF - Cost 154,000 199,000 
State Comptroller - Fringe 
Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost 60,535 80,714 
Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
See Below See Below 
Note: GF=General Fund 
 Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill requires the Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) to 
license and regulate data brokers resulting in a cost and potential 
revenue gain to the state.  To meet the requirements of the bill DCP will 
have to hire a state program manager and a staff attorney for a cost of 
$154,000 in FY 26
2
 and $199,000 in FY 27, along with associated fringe 
benefit costs of $60,535 in FY 26 and $80,714 in FY 27. The new 
employees are required to regulate the market, ensure compliance, 
conduct hearings, and issue civil penalties for violations. 
The bill requires DCP to oversee the registration of data brokers for 
an annual application and renewal fee of $600 and allows DCP to 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 40.71% of payroll in FY 26. 
2
FY 26 costs reflect nine months of expenditures due to the bill's 10/2/25 effective date.  2025SB-01356-R000609-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 2 
 
 
impose a civil penalty of $500 per day (not to exceed $10,000 per year) 
for violations resulting in a potential revenue gain to the state to the 
extent applications are received and that violations occur.  
The bill also changes various data privacy laws resulting in no fiscal 
impact to the state. 
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to the number of applications, number 
of violations, employee wage increases, and inflation.