An Act Confirming And Adopting Volumes 1 To 13, Inclusive, Of The General Statutes Revised To January 1, 2025.
The passage of SB 1379 is expected to have a significant impact on state law by officially integrating updated statutes and legislative changes enacted from 1959 to 2024. This process of revision and codification aims to eliminate discrepancies and ensure all public acts are easily accessible and consistent with current legislative intent. By streamlining the statutes, it facilitates better understanding and implementation of the law by state officials, practitioners, and the public, thereby promoting legal clarity within Connecticut's legal framework.
Senate Bill 1379 is an act aimed at confirming and adopting the revised volumes of the general statutes of Connecticut, specifically Volumes 1 to 13, revised through January 1, 2025. The bill indicates an administrative effort to consolidate and codify Connecticut's legislative acts into a single, coherent framework. By adopting these revisions, the act ensures that the public has access to the most current and applicable legal references, aligning statutory language with contemporary understandings and applications of the law.
The overall sentiment surrounding SB 1379 appears to be neutral to positive, as it is a technical measure rather than a politically contentious bill. Members of the General Assembly seem to support this revision as an essential step in maintaining the integrity and accessibility of state law. Since the bill dealt primarily with procedural aspects and legal consolidation, it did not attract widespread public debate or opposition, making it a relatively low-key legislative effort.
While the bill does not seem to have faced significant contention during discussions or voting, some members raised concerns about ensuring that the revised statutes accurately reflect the intentions and context of past legislative actions. The importance of transparency in the revision process was highlighted, with calls for thorough review by commission members responsible for the codification. Nevertheless, no significant legislative dissent was recorded, resulting in a unanimous favorable vote.