Connecticut Senate Bill SB01495

Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/24/25
• Refer: 4/7/25
• Report Pass: 4/14/25

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection's Review Of Surplus State Property.

Impact

The impact of SB 1495 could be significant, as it provides guidelines for how state properties may be utilized, thereby promoting efficiency in government operations. By requiring agencies to assess properties within a specified timeframe, the bill may enhance the ability of state departments to effectively utilize resources for public welfare, economic development, and environmental sustainability. This operational efficiency would potentially lead to better management of state assets and improved services to the community.

Summary

Senate Bill 1495 concerns the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection's review of surplus state property. The bill lays out a framework for various state agencies to evaluate surplus properties and determine their potential use based on specific departmental missions. This includes assessments for economic development, transportation purposes, open space needs, and housing, particularly for low and moderate-income families. The bill aims to streamline the process by which surplus state properties can be repurposed for the benefit of state initiatives.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 1495 appears to be supportive among stakeholders interested in efficient state resource management and those advocating for economic development initiatives. There is a general recognition of the potential benefits of repurposing surplus properties in ways that align with public needs. However, there may also be underlying concerns regarding the adequacy of oversight and the implications for local communities, particularly in terms of ensuring equitable access to redeveloped state properties.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the specific criteria that state agencies use to evaluate and repurpose surplus properties. Some advocates may argue that there needs to be a clearer focus on the input of local communities in these decisions to prevent potential misalignment between state objectives and local needs. Additionally, issues related to transparency in the review process and the potential environmental impacts of new developments on repurposed land may also be debated.