Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00069

Introduced
3/18/25  
Refer
3/18/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/16/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Report Pass
6/2/25  
Passed
6/4/25  

Caption

Resolution Concerning The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner Concerning The Claim Against The State Of The Estate Of Ryan Marzi, Administrator Richard Marzi Confirming The Decision, In Part, And Vacating The Award And Granting Permission To Sue The State, In Part.

Impact

If enacted, this resolution would have implications for how claims against the state can be contested, particularly in terms of the Claims Commissioner's authority and the recourse available to individuals who feel aggrieved by such decisions. The provision granting permission to sue means that claimants now have a pathway to challenge the state's decisions regarding claims, potentially leading to increased litigation in similar cases.

Summary

SJ00069 is a resolution concerning the decision made by the Claims Commissioner regarding a claim against the state related to the estate of Ryan Marzi. This resolution confirms part of the Commissioner's decision to deny the claim and vacates a previously awarded sum of twenty thousand dollars. The action allows the claimant, Richard Marzi, to sue the state concerning the portion of the claim for which the award has been vacated, under specific statutory provisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJ00069 appears generally supportive among the members voting, as evidenced by the unanimous support received during its passage (39 yeas and 0 nays). This suggests a consensus around the need for legal recourse regarding state claims, although specific points of contention or opposition may not have been documented in the available materials.

Contention

While the resolution is predominantly seen as a procedural step forward for claimants, it raises questions about the nature of claims against the state and the extent of liability. Critics may argue about the implications of allowing individuals to directly sue the state, potentially leading to increased administrative burdens or financial concerns for state resources. However, the resolution's primary aim is to reaffirm the ability of individuals to contest claim decisions, striking a balance between state authority and individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HJ00201

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner Concerning The Claim Against The State Of Guy D'aniello.

CT SJ00176

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Richard Saucier.

CT HJ00094

Resolution Vacating The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claims Against The State Of Justin Lund And Shawn Saunders And Authorizing The Claimants To Sue The State.

CT HJ00176

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00178

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00175

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jesse Crystal.

CT HJ00100

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny Or Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00090

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Thomas Brown.

CT HJ00197

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jane Doe.

CT HJ00080

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Zwinda Soto, Ppa Jesus Rivera.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.