1 | 1 | | COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
2 | 2 | | The John A. Wilson Building |
---|
3 | 3 | | 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, nw |
---|
4 | 4 | | Washington, D.C. 20004 |
---|
5 | 5 | | |
---|
6 | 6 | | 1 |
---|
7 | 7 | | |
---|
8 | 8 | | Statement of Introduction |
---|
9 | 9 | | Unlocking Housing at Metro Property Tax Exemption Amendment Act of 2023 |
---|
10 | 10 | | October 25, 2023 |
---|
11 | 11 | | Today, I am introducing the Unlocking Housing at Metro Property Tax Exemption Amendment |
---|
12 | 12 | | Act of 2023, along with Councilmembers Brianne K. Nadeau, Vincent C. Gray, and Brooke |
---|
13 | 13 | | Pinto. This legislation would accelerate development of much-needed mixed-use residential |
---|
14 | 14 | | projects at District Metro stations that currently do not generate any tax revenues and where |
---|
15 | 15 | | pursuing transit-oriented development through joint development agreements is currently |
---|
16 | 16 | | financially infeasible. |
---|
17 | 17 | | A common feature of thriving urban areas, transit-oriented development (TOD) features |
---|
18 | 18 | | compact, high-density, mixed-use areas within walking distance of a central transit stop in a |
---|
19 | 19 | | public transportation system. TOD projects maximize residential, business, and leisure space and |
---|
20 | 20 | | create more walkable, vibrant, exciting communities. People living in TOD zones in the District |
---|
21 | 21 | | drive less, more frequently bike, walk, and use public transportation more, energizing |
---|
22 | 22 | | neighborhoods and advancing sustainable transit goals. |
---|
23 | 23 | | 1 |
---|
24 | 24 | | Since WMATA’s inception, District |
---|
25 | 25 | | leaders and residents have recognized the potential of integrating transit hubs with housing, |
---|
26 | 26 | | retail, and other amenities, and have worked with WMATA to invest in the blocks around Metro |
---|
27 | 27 | | stations. |
---|
28 | 28 | | WMATA is a national leader in TOD, having already delivered 55 buildings at 30 stations |
---|
29 | 29 | | throughout the region. Since 1975, WMATA has built TOD projects in the District at the |
---|
30 | 30 | | Farragut North, Gallery Place/Chinatown, Tenleytown, Columbia Heights, Navy Yard, Rhode |
---|
31 | 31 | | Island Avenue, Fort Totten, Georgia Avenue/Petworth, Minnesota Avenue, Metro Center, |
---|
32 | 32 | | McPherson Square, Shaw/Howard University, U Street-Cardozo, and Van Ness/UDC stations. |
---|
33 | 33 | | 2 |
---|
34 | 34 | | |
---|
35 | 35 | | The projects that WMATA advanced at these stations brought in even more private and public |
---|
36 | 36 | | investment in the neighborhoods surrounding these Metro stops, attracting new stores, arts and |
---|
37 | 37 | | entertainment venues, medical providers, restaurants, and additional businesses that provide |
---|
38 | 38 | | essential services, all of which also create new jobs. WMATA’s TOD projects throughout the |
---|
39 | 39 | | DMV region have yielded 17 million square feet of mixed-used development, generated 5 |
---|
40 | 40 | | million new annual Metro trips, and raised $194 million in new annual state and local taxes. |
---|
41 | 41 | | 3 |
---|
42 | 42 | | |
---|
43 | 43 | | |
---|
44 | 44 | | 1 |
---|
45 | 45 | | The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas, 2014. |
---|
46 | 46 | | Arefeh Nasri, Lei Zhan |
---|
47 | 47 | | 2 |
---|
48 | 48 | | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 10-Year Strategic Plan for Joint Development |
---|
49 | 49 | | 3 |
---|
50 | 50 | | Ibid. |
---|
51 | 51 | | Christina Henderson Committee Member |
---|
52 | 52 | | Councilmember, At-Large Hospital and Health Equity |
---|
53 | 53 | | Chairperson, Committee on Health Judiciary and Public Safety |
---|
54 | 54 | | Transportation and the Environment |
---|
55 | 55 | | COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
56 | 56 | | The John A. Wilson Building |
---|
57 | 57 | | 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, nw |
---|
58 | 58 | | Washington, D.C. 20004 |
---|
59 | 59 | | |
---|
60 | 60 | | 2 |
---|
61 | 61 | | WMATA has plans for TODs at additional Metro stations in the District, including at the |
---|
62 | 62 | | Anacostia, Congress Heights, Brookland, Deanwood, Fort Totten, and Friendship Heights |
---|
63 | 63 | | stations. However, there are challenges to developing these sites, including working around the |
---|
64 | 64 | | existing transit facilities and infrastructure such as the rail tracks and traction power sub-stations |
---|
65 | 65 | | as well as needs for roadway improvements, utilities relocation, replacing commuter parking, |
---|
66 | 66 | | and reconfiguring bus loops. Preliminary feasibility analysis identified that projects at Congress |
---|
67 | 67 | | Heights, Deanwood and Brookland could yield from $1M up to $14M per site in net property |
---|
68 | 68 | | taxes to the District over 30 years after accounting for the upfront infrastructure costs, but may |
---|
69 | 69 | | not be feasible in the near-term without any public assistance. At Fort Totten and Friendship |
---|
70 | 70 | | Heights initial infrastructure cost estimates exceed the property tax revenues generated by |
---|
71 | 71 | | development over 30 years and may require other assistance to support project feasibility. These |
---|
72 | 72 | | forecasts impact WMATA’s ability to unlock the full potential of its property for housing at |
---|
73 | 73 | | these sites. The properties also do not generate any tax revenues for the District as they have no |
---|
74 | 74 | | private uses or development, and represent a missed opportunity to invest in residents. |
---|
75 | 75 | | The District’s regional neighbors have provided mechanisms to WMATA to reduce cost burdens |
---|
76 | 76 | | and achieve higher density at Metro stations. For example, in 2020, the Montgomery County |
---|
77 | 77 | | Council passed the More Housing at Metrorail Stations Act, which provides a tax abatement that |
---|
78 | 78 | | lowers the cost of developing high-rise buildings, thereby increasing density, allowing WMATA |
---|
79 | 79 | | and its partners to produce more market-rate and affordable housing units, and expediting |
---|
80 | 80 | | development. The stability of the abatement convinced WMATA and its joint development |
---|
81 | 81 | | partners to commit to building even more housing at Metro stations than it otherwise could have. |
---|
82 | 82 | | To realize the transit-oriented development potential at the remaining Metro stations in the |
---|
83 | 83 | | District, this bill would waive property taxes for 20 years on qualifying developments at Metro |
---|
84 | 84 | | stations. To qualify, WMATA must enter into a joint development agreement that provides that |
---|
85 | 85 | | at least half of a development must be housing, and 75% of the project overall must consist of |
---|
86 | 86 | | new construction or substantially rehabilitated structures. The exemption would be available |
---|
87 | 87 | | beginning on January 1, 2024. |
---|
88 | 88 | | I look forward to working with my Council colleagues and the public to advance this legislation |
---|
89 | 89 | | and to build on the District’s strong transit-oriented development record for the benefit of current |
---|
90 | 90 | | and future residents. |
---|
91 | 91 | | 1 |
---|
92 | 92 | | _____________________________ _____________________________ 1 |
---|
93 | 93 | | Councilmember Brianne K. Nadeau Councilmember Christina Henderson 2 |
---|
94 | 94 | | 3 |
---|
95 | 95 | | 4 |
---|
96 | 96 | | _____________________________ _____________________________ 5 |
---|
97 | 97 | | Councilmember Brooke Pinto Councilmember Vincent C. Gray 6 |
---|
98 | 98 | | 7 |
---|
99 | 99 | | 8 |
---|
100 | 100 | | 9 |
---|
101 | 101 | | 10 |
---|
102 | 102 | | A BILL 11 |
---|
103 | 103 | | 12 |
---|
104 | 104 | | _______________ 13 |
---|
105 | 105 | | 14 |
---|
106 | 106 | | 15 |
---|
107 | 107 | | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 16 |
---|
108 | 108 | | 17 |
---|
109 | 109 | | _______________________ 18 |
---|
110 | 110 | | 19 |
---|
111 | 111 | | To amend section 47-1002 of the District of Columbia Official Code to exempt from real 20 |
---|
112 | 112 | | property taxation qualifying improvements located on land subject to a Joint 21 |
---|
113 | 113 | | Development Agreement with the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority in the 22 |
---|
114 | 114 | | District. 23 |
---|
115 | 115 | | 24 |
---|
116 | 116 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 25 |
---|
117 | 117 | | act may be cited as the “Unlocking Housing at Metro Property Tax Exemption Amendment Act 26 |
---|
118 | 118 | | of 2023”. 27 |
---|
119 | 119 | | Sec. 2. Section 47-1002 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended as follows: 28 |
---|
120 | 120 | | (a) Paragraph (32)(B) is amended by striking the phrase “; and” and inserting a semicolon 29 |
---|
121 | 121 | | in its place. 30 |
---|
122 | 122 | | (b) Paragraph (33) is amended by striking the period and inserting the phrase “; and” in 31 |
---|
123 | 123 | | its place. 32 |
---|
124 | 124 | | (c) A new paragraph (34) is added to read as follows: 33 2 |
---|
125 | 125 | | “(34)(A) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, a 34 |
---|
126 | 126 | | qualifying development located on land subject to a Joint Development Agreement with the 35 |
---|
127 | 127 | | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). 36 |
---|
128 | 128 | | “(B) The real property tax exemption granted by subparagraph (A) of this 37 |
---|
129 | 129 | | paragraph shall apply only: 38 |
---|
130 | 130 | | “(i) For 20 consecutive real property tax years beginning on the 39 |
---|
131 | 131 | | date that a certificate of occupancy for a qualifying development is issued; and 40 |
---|
132 | 132 | | “(ii) To a qualifying development constructed after January 1, 41 |
---|
133 | 133 | | 2024. 42 |
---|
134 | 134 | | “(C) The real property tax exemption granted by subparagraph (A) of this 43 |
---|
135 | 135 | | paragraph shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other tax relief or assistance from any 44 |
---|
136 | 136 | | other source applicable to the qualifying development. 45 |
---|
137 | 137 | | “(D) Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent or restrict WMATA from 46 |
---|
138 | 138 | | utilizing any other tax, development, or other economic incentives available to Joint 47 |
---|
139 | 139 | | Development Agreement partners or the qualifying development, including other tax, 48 |
---|
140 | 140 | | development, or other economic incentives shall set forth in Chapter 38 of this chapter. 49 |
---|
141 | 141 | | “(E) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit WMATA or 50 |
---|
142 | 142 | | Joint Development Agreement partners from appealing or contesting a real estate tax assessment 51 |
---|
143 | 143 | | of a qualifying development. 52 |
---|
144 | 144 | | “(F) For the purposes of this paragraph, the term: 53 |
---|
145 | 145 | | “(i) “Joint Development Agreement” means a contract between 54 |
---|
146 | 146 | | WMATA and a third party to sell or ground lease WMATA property for a qualifying 55 |
---|
147 | 147 | | development; and 56 3 |
---|
148 | 148 | | “(ii) “Qualifying development” means a real property development 57 |
---|
149 | 149 | | in which: 58 |
---|
150 | 150 | | “(I) Improvements are made to real property subject to a 59 |
---|
151 | 151 | | Joint Development Agreement with WMATA in the District; 60 |
---|
152 | 152 | | “(II) At least 50% of the improvements include the 61 |
---|
153 | 153 | | construction of multifamily apartment buildings; provided, that all multifamily apartment 62 |
---|
154 | 154 | | buildings located on the property shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 10 of Title 11-C 63 |
---|
155 | 155 | | of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations; and 64 |
---|
156 | 156 | | “(III) At least 75% of the improvements consist of 65 |
---|
157 | 157 | | buildings that are newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated.”. 66 |
---|
158 | 158 | | Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 67 |
---|
159 | 159 | | The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 68 |
---|
160 | 160 | | impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 69 |
---|
161 | 161 | | approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a). 70 |
---|
162 | 162 | | Sec. 4. Effective date. 71 |
---|
163 | 163 | | This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 72 |
---|
164 | 164 | | Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as 73 |
---|
165 | 165 | | provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 74 |
---|
166 | 166 | | 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 75 |
---|
167 | 167 | | Columbia Register. 76 |
---|