District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B25-0847 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 06/10/2024

                            COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
The John A. Wilson Building 
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, nw 
Washington, D.C. 20004 
Statement of Introduction 
Advancing Equity in Special Education Pro
tocols Amendment Act of 2024 
June 10, 2024 
Today, I am proud to
 introduce the Advancing Equity in Special Education Protocols Amendment Act 
of 202
4, along with Councilmembers Robert C. White, Jr., Brooke Pinto, Janeese Lewis George, and 
Zachary Parker. This legislatio
n would give a student with special needs who has an individualized 
ed
ucation program (IEP) the right to remain in their initial p	lacement feeder pattern, unless the 
programs available in their feeder pattern cannot support their need
s. In the event that a student with 
an
 IEP is moved to a school outside of their feeder pattern, the student’s IEP team would be informed 
in writing of the ratio
nale for the mov e. Additionally, this bill would require the Execu	tive to 
promulgate rules that establish staff-to-student ratio standard
s for self-contained special education 
classrooms. In the ev
ent that the number of students in a self-contained special education classroom 
increases and the classro
om does not conform with the staff-to-student ratio standard, a local education 
ag
ency (LEA) would provide a written explanation within 5 days to teachers in an affected self-
co
ntained special education classroom, p	arents of stud ents in an impacted self-contained special 
ed
ucation classroom, and school administrators describing the additional resources and personnel th	at 
will be allocated to meet each
 student’s needs as defined by their IEP.  
Ensuring that a student with special education need
s remains in their initial feeder pattern is crucial for 
their ed
ucational an d social development. Stab	ility in school placement is critical for students with 
special needs, providing them with a consistent environment where they can build relationship
s, 
receive contin
uous support, and achieve their academic goals.  Students with special needs benefit 
significantly from stable ed
ucational environments and d	isruptions in school placements can lead to 
gaps in their educatio
n, increased anxiety, and declines in both academic performance and social well-
being.  
Furthermore, establishing clear staff-to-student ratio standards an
d abiding by these standards is critical 
for teacher well-being and effectiveness. It also ensures a learning enviro
nment that can meet the needs 
of each student. Maintaining appropriate staff-to-student ratios in special education
 classrooms 
improves student engagement, academic ach
ievement, and reduces behavioral issues. When staff-t	o-
student ratio
s are exceeded, the LEA should provide an explanation to teachers, administrators, and 
parents to
 ensure that adequate resources and supports are in place to meet each student’s needs.   
I look forward to working with my colleagues on the Council to pass this legislatio
n, which will 
support dedicated special ed
ucation teachers, improve educational outcomes, and expand the overall 
well-being o
f students in self-c ontained classrooms. 
Christina Henderson 	Committee Member 
Councilmember, At-Large 	Hospital and Health Equity 
Chairperson, Committee on Health 	Judiciary and Public Safety 
Transportation and the Environment
Christina Henderson 	Committee Member 
Councilmember, At-Large 	Hospital and Health Equity 
Chairperson, Committee on Health 	Judiciary and Public Safety 
Transportation and the Environment 
   	1 
_____________________________ _____________________________  1 
Councilmember Robert C. White, Jr.  Councilmember Christina Henderson 2 
 3 
 4 
_____________________________ _____________________________ 5 
Councilmember Janeese Lewis George Councilmember Brooke Pinto 6 
 7 
 8 
_____________________________ 9 
Councilmember Zachary Parker 10 
 11 
 12 
 13 
 14 
A BILL 15 
 16 
_______________ 17 
 18 
 19 
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20 
 21 
_______________________ 22 
 23 
To amend the Special Education Procedural Protections Expansion Act of 2014 to give a child 24 
with a disability with an individualized education program the right to remain in their 25 
initial placement feeder pattern unless there is no program available in their feeder 26 
pattern, to require that an LEA consult with the IEP team of a child with a disability prior 27 
to any change in the child’s service location, to require that an LEA provide a written 28 
explanation to the parent of a child with a disability before any change in service location 29 
for the child is made and explain why the special education services in the current feeder 30 
pattern cannot meet the child’s needs if the action removes the child from their current 31 
placement’s feeder pattern, and to require that an LEA provide a written explanation to 32 
the special education teacher in an affected self-contained special education program 33 
classroom, the parents of students in an affected self-contained special education 34 
classroom, and school administrators, describing the additional resources and personnel 35 
that will be allocated to a classroom when the student-to-staff ratio exceeds those ratios 36 
set by regulation.  37 
 38 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 39 
act may be cited as the “Advancing Equity in Special Education Protocols Amendment Act of 40 
2024”. 41  2 
Sec. 2.  The Special Education Procedural Protections Expansion Act of 2014, effective 42 
March 10, 2015 (D.C. Law 20-194; D.C. Official Code § 38-2571.01 et seq), is amended as 43 
follows: 44 
(a)Section 101 (D.C. Official Code § 38-2571.01), is amended by adding a new45 
paragraph (4A) to read as follows: 46 
“(4A) “Self-contained special education classroom” means a full-time, outside of 47 
general-education classroom that provides instruction for students in accordance with their 48 
IEPs.”. 49 
(b)Section 103 (D.C. Official Code § 38-2571.03) is amended as follows:50 
(1) The existing language is redesignated as subsection (b).51 
(2)A new subsection (a) is added to read as follows:52 
“(a) A child with a disability has the right to continue with their initial placement’s feeder 53 
pattern as that term is defined in section 1102a(2A) of the School Based Budgeting and 54 
Accountability Act of 1998, effective June 21, 2014 (D.C. Law 20-114; D.C. Official Code § 38-55 
2801.01(2A)), unless the new service location within the feeder pattern does not have special 56 
education services available that would support the child’s IEP.”. 57 
(3) Subsection (b)(1) is amended to read as follows:58 
“(b)(1) Before any change in service location for a child with a disability is made, 59 
the LEA shall consult with the child’s IEP team as defined by 20 USC § 1414 (d)(1) and shall 60 
provide the IEP team with written notice of the proposed change, which shall at minimum 61 
include:”. 62 
(4)Subsection (b)(1)(B) is amended to read as follows:63 
“(B) An explanation of the following: 64  3 
(i) Why the LEA proposes to take the action; and65 
(ii) Why the special education services in the current feeder66 
pattern cannot meet the student’s needs, if the action removes the child from their current 67 
placement’s feeder pattern;”. 68 
(c)New sections 105 and 106 are added to read as follows:69 
“Sec. 105.  Self -contained classroom size. 70 
“If the student to staff ratio in a self	-contained special education classroom
 exceeds the 71 
ratio set by the rules promulgated pursuant to section 106, an LEA shall provide a written 72 
explanation to the special education teacher in an affected self-contained special education 73 
classroom, the parents of the students in an affected self	-contained special education classroom, 74 
and school administrators, describing the additional resources or personnel that will be allocated 75 
to a self-contained special education classroom to meet each student’s needs as defined by their 76 
IEP, within 5 business days.”. 77 
“Sec. 106. Rulemaking. 78 
“The Mayor, pursuant to Title I of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure 79 
Act, approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C. Official Code § 2-501 et seq.), shall 80 
promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this title no later than 120 days after the 81 
effective date of this section.”. 82 
Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 83 
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 84 
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 85 
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a). 86 
Sec. 4. Effective date. 87  4 
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 88 
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto) and a 30-day period of congressional review 89 
as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 90 
24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)). 91