District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B25-0948 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 09/16/2024

                            COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
The John A. Wilson Building 
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, nw 
Washington, D.C. 20004 
 
 
Statement of Introduction on the  
Certificate of Need Improvement Amendment Act of 2024 
September 16, 2024 
 
Today, along with Councilmembers Charles Allen, Anita Bonds, Janeese Lewis George, 
and Zachary Parker, I am introducing the Certificate of Need Improvement Amendment Act of 
2024. This bill aims to strengthen and modernize the process through which a new institutional 
health service, or capital expenditure related to an existing medical/health asset, obtains a 
Certificate of Need (CON) from the State Health Planning and Development Agency (SHPDA) 
within DC Health. Although 35 states require CONs in some instances, the District’s requirements 
are the third most extensive among U.S. states, covering 25 types of health care services. Many 
health care providers in the District cite the CON process as an obstacle to improving and 
expanding health care services for District residents, given the typical 6-9 month process and 
significant associated expenses. This bill aims to strike a balance between maintaining the benefits 
of the CON process, which include enforcing uncompensated care requirements and promoting 
health equity, and removing unnecessary and burdensome obstacles for health care institutions and 
providers. 
The primary purpose of the CON process is to control the number of health care resources 
in a given area, by requiring hospitals and health care systems to demonstrate the public need for 
a new health care service, facility, or expenditure from the state before starting the project. 
Although research has never shown that CONs control or reduce health care spending, CONs are 
a primary tool for state governments to encourage health care services to be distributed equitably. 
In the case of the District, CONs are one tool for DC Health to encourage health care services in 
parts of the District with less access to health care, such as Wards 7 and 8. Additionally, CON 
programs enable state governments to enforce uncompensated care requirements, and are also one 
of the only tools for regulating corporate mergers and acquisitions, which have been shown to 
increase healthcare spending. 
This bill proposes several improvements to the District’s CON process: 
1. Exempt Telehealth: The District is an outlier in its enforcement of the CON process, 
which was created to regulate the geographic distribution of brick-and-mortar health care 
services, for virtual provider networks and virtual telehealth platforms. The bill instead 
requires DC Health to create a registration process for these entities. 
2. Exempt office-based primary care and specialist practices: Only 2 other states regulate 
primary care facilities under CON (NJ, KY) and only 2 other states regulate specialist 
Christina Henderson 	Committee Member 
Councilmember, At-Large 	Hospital and Health Equity 
Chairperson, Committee on Health 	Judiciary and Public Safety 
 	Transportation and the Environment 
  COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
The John A. Wilson Building 
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, nw 
Washington, D.C. 20004 
 
practices with no operating rooms (VA, GA, KY). This would align the District with other 
states and encourage more primary and specialist care services to locate in the District. 
3. Require biennial updates to the capital thresholds: SHPDA currently has the authority 
to update the capital expenditure thresholds that would trigger a CON review on an annual 
basis, but this does not regularly occur. This bill would require SHPDA to update the 
thresholds every 2 years to accurately reflect inflation and other economic indicators. 
4. Exclude nonpatient care capital projects: Currently, health care facilities must submit 
for CON review for capital projects not related to patient care, such as installing new 
elevators, garage improvements, and HVAC upgrades. These reviews can delay necessary 
repairs and upgrades and create unnecessary costs. This bill proposes exempting these 
types of nonpatient care projects.  
5. More flexible project timeline: Currently, SHPDA imposes a uniform deadline of 3 years 
for CON approved capital projects. Facilities have had to restart the process when an active 
project is taking longer than expected. This bill proposes a more flexible approach to extend 
the timeline if the applicant is making good faith efforts to meet the schedule. 
6. Define “Group practice”: Although the term “group practice” is used in the current D.C. 
Code, it is not a defined term, which has led to confusion about when a new health care 
facility must apply for a CON. This bill seeks to clearly define that term. 
7. Adjust threshold for number of beds: Currently, SHPDA requires any facility changing 
its licensed bed capacity to obtain a CON if the change is by at least 10 beds or 10% of 
total beds, whichever is less. This bill proposes increasing the threshold to 10 beds or 20% 
of total beds, to avoid small facilities going through a lengthy CON process for small 
changes to their operations.  
 
These proposed changes will encourage more health care facilities to enter and stay in the 
District, bringing more jobs and health care access to our residents. I look forward to working with 
my Council colleagues and other stakeholders to advance and pass this legislation.     	1 
 1 
 ____________________________                                       ______________________________ 2 
Councilmember Charles Allen Councilmember Christina Henderson 3 
 4 
 5 
____________________________                                       ______________________________ 6 
 Councilmember Zachary Parker          Councilmember Janeese Lewis George 7 
 8 
 9 
______________________________ 10 
Councilmember Anita Bonds   11 
 12 
 13 
A BILL 14 
 15 
_________________ 16 
 17 
 18 
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 19 
 20 
_________________ 21 
 22 
 23 
To amend the Health Services Planning Program Re-establishment Act of 1996 to exempt from 24 
the certificate of need process digital-only telehealth platforms and providers and primary 25 
care and specialty care providers not affiliated with hospitals and medical schools, to 26 
define group practice and nonpatient care project, to remove the 3 year maximum on 27 
certificate of need applications for active projects, to require the State Health Planning 28 
and Development Agency to update the capital expenditure and medical equipment 29 
spending thresholds every two years, to increase the number of beds that must be added 30 
or removed at a health care facility in order to trigger a certificate of need, and to require 31 
the Department of Health to create a registration process for facilities offering primary 32 
and secondary care, virtual provider networks, and virtual telehealth platforms. 33 
 34 
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 35 
act may be cited as the “Certificate of Need Improvement Amendment Act of 2024.” 36 
 Sec. 2. The Health Services Planning Program Re-establishment Act of 1996, effective 37 
April 9, 1997 (D.C. Law 11-191; D.C. Official Code § 44–401 et seq.), is amended as follows: 38 
 (a) Section 2 is amended as follows: 39 
 (1) Paragraph (3) is amended as follows: 40   	2 
 (A) Subparagraph (A) is amended as follows: 41 
(i) Sub-subparagraph (i) is amended by striking the phrase 42 
“SHPDA may, by rule, adjust this threshold annually” and inserting the phrase “SHPDA shall, 43 
by rule, adjust this threshold every 2 years” in its place. 44 
  (ii) Sub-subparagraph (ii) is amended by striking the phrase 45 
“SHPDA may, by rule, adjust this threshold annually” and inserting the phrase “SHPDA shall, 46 
by rule, adjust this threshold every 2 years” in its place. 47 
 (B) A new subparagraph (C) is added to read as follows: 48 
 “(C) The term “capital expenditure” does not include an expenditure on a 49 
nonpatient care project.”. 50 
 (2) A new paragraph (9B) is added to read as follows: 51 
 “(9B) “Group practice” means: 52 
“(A) A group of 2 or more health professionals, including a faculty practice 53 
plan, legally organized and authorized to do business in the District of Columbia, for which: 54 
“(i) Each member of the group is licensed to practice in the District 55 
of Columbia and provides substantially the full range of services which the health professional 56 
routinely provides, including medical care, consultation, diagnosis, or treatment, through the 57 
joint use of shared office space, facilities, equipment and personnel, except surgery as defined at 58 
D.C. Official Code § 44-501(13A); 59 
“(ii) Substantially all of the services provided through the group are 60 
billed under a billing number assigned to the group and amounts received are treated as revenue 61 
of the group; 62   	3 
“(iii) The overhead expenses of and the income from the practice are 63 
distributed in accordance with methods previously determined by group members; 64 
“(iv) No member of the group directly or indirectly receives 65 
compensation based on the volume or value of referrals by the health professional; and 66 
“(v) Members of the group personally conduct no less than 75 67 
percent of the patient encounters of the group practice. 68 
“(B) In the case of a faculty practice plan associated with a hospital, 69 
institution of higher education, or medical school with an approved medical residency training 70 
program, paragraph (A) of this section shall only apply to the services provided within the 71 
faculty practice plan.”. 72 
 (3) Paragraph (10) is amended to read as follows: 73 
 “(10) “Health care facility” or “HCF” means any private general hospital, 74 
psychiatric hospital, other specialty hospital, rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility, 75 
intermediate care facility, ambulatory care center or clinic, ambulatory surgical facility, kidney 76 
disease treatment center, freestanding hemodialysis facility, diagnostic health care facility home 77 
health agency, hospice, or other comparable health care facility which has an annual operating 78 
budget of at least $500,000. The term “health care facility” shall not include the private office 79 
facilities, clinics, or other establishments with no operating rooms where a health professional or 80 
group of health professionals provides primary care services or specialty care services according 81 
to the applicable scope of practice defined by their licensure; a virtual provider network or 82 
virtual telehealth platform; or a health care facility licensed or to be licensed as a community 83 
residence facility, or an Assisted Living Residence as defined by section 201 of the Assisted 84   	4 
Living Residence Regulatory Act of 2000, effective June 24, 2000 (D.C. Law 13-127; D.C. 85 
Official Code § 44-102.01).”. 86 
 (4) Paragraph (12) is amended by striking the phrase “services provided by 87 
physicians, dentists, HMOs, and other individual providers in individual or group practice.” and 88 
inserting the phrase “services provided within private office facilities, clinics, or other 89 
establishments with no operating rooms where a health professional or group of health 90 
professionals provides primary care services or specialty care services according to the 91 
applicable scope of practice defined by their licensure, or services provided by a virtual 92 
provider network or accessed through a virtual telehealth platform.” in its place.  93 
 (5) Paragraph (14)(A)(i) is amended by striking the phrase “SHPDA may, by rule, 94 
adjust this threshold annually” and inserting the phrase “SHPDA shall, by rule, adjust this 95 
threshold every 2 years” in its place. 96 
 (6) Paragraph (15) is amended as follows: 97 
 (A) Subparagraph (A) is amended as follows: 98 
 (i) Sub-subparagraph (iii) is amended by striking the phrase “Any 99 
new health service;” and inserting the phrase “Any new health service with a physical location;” 100 
in its place. 101 
 (ii) Sub-subparagraph (iv) is amended by striking the phrase “or 102 
10%” and insert the phrase “or 20%” in its place. 103 
 (B) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “SHPDA may, by 104 
rule, adjust this threshold annually” and inserting the phrase “SHPDA shall, by rule, adjust this 105 
threshold every 2 years” in its place. 106 
 (7) A new paragraph (15A) is added to read as follows: 107   	5 
 “(15A) “Nonpatient care project” means any capital project by a healthcare facility or a 108 
hospital that does not solely directly or indirectly impact clinical procedures, treatments, patient 109 
interactions, or clinical areas. Nonpatient care projects can include the construction or renovation 110 
of administrative offices; the purchase of non-medical equipment such as office furniture or IT 111 
systems; renovation or replacement of electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation systems; 112 
replacement or renovation of elevator and escalators or other means of ingress and egress; 113 
renovation or replacement of fire and life safety systems; and other initiatives focused solely on 114 
supporting the administrative functions of the facility.”. 115 
(8) New paragraphs (21) and (22) are added to read as follows: 116 
 “(21) “Virtual provider network” means a provider-owned and managed entity which 117 
employs or contracts with licensed health care providers, and which exclusively provides 118 
telehealth or telemedicine health care services through a virtual telehealth platform. The term 119 
“virtual provider network” does not mean an entity who maintains a physical facility, office, or 120 
other similar location in any jurisdiction where a person may go to seek care in person. 121 
 “(22) “Virtual telehealth platform” means a digital-only telehealth or telemedicine entity 122 
which facilitates the ability for District residents to access licensed health care providers by 123 
exclusively providing health care services through a virtual provider network. The term “virtual 124 
telehealth platform” does not mean an entity who maintains a physical facility, office, or other 125 
similar location in any jurisdiction where a person may go to seek care in person.”. 126 
 (b) Section 3 is amended as follows: 127 
 (1) Subsection (b-1) is repealed. 128 
 (2) A new subsection b-2 is inserted to read as follows: 129   	6 
 “(b-2)(1) The Director of the Department of Health shall create a registration process for 130 
facilities offering primary care and specialty care services, virtual provider networks, and virtual 131 
telehealth platforms operating in the District.  132 
“(2) The registration process shall be consistent with and shall not create 133 
requirements more restrictive than those set forth in the provisions contained in this Act.”. 134 
 (c) Section 8(b) is amended as follows: 135 
(1) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase “requiring the obligation of a 136 
capital expenditure of less than $8 million;” and inserting a semicolon in its place. 137 
(2) A new paragraph (21) is added to read as follows: 138 
 “(21) Any proposal by a virtual telehealth platform or virtual provider network to 139 
provide access to, offer, or develop health care services provided exclusively via a virtual 140 
telehealth platform and accessible by District of Columbia residents.”. 141 
 (d) Section 12(a) is amended by striking the phrase “; except that no certificate of need 142 
shall be effective for more than 3 years from the original date of issuance.” and inserting a period 143 
in its place.  144 
 Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 145 
 The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 146 
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 147 
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a). 148 
 Sec. 4. Effective date. 149 
 This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 150 
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as 151 
provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 152   	7 
24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 153 
Columbia Register.  154