District Of Columbia Council Bill PR25-0064

District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23
• Passed: 2/7/23

Caption

Modification to Human Care Agreement No. CW100311 with Open Arms Housing Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Declaration Resolution of 2023

Impact

The resolution's impact is particularly significant for the District of Columbia's commitment to providing permanent supportive housing solutions. By facilitating the financial augmentation to the existing agreement, the bill ensures Open Arms Housing can continue to deliver necessary services that aid vulnerable populations in the community. It reflects the ongoing efforts by local government to allocate funds effectively towards service providers who play a crucial role in social welfare.

Summary

PR25-0064, formally titled the 'Modification to Human Care Agreement No. CW100311 with Open Arms Housing Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Declaration Resolution of 2023,' aims to address an urgent financial need for continued service provision by Open Arms Housing. This resolution allows for a modification of a previous agreement, increasing the total contract amount from $950,000 to approximately $2.31 million, thereby ensuring that the essential permanent supportive housing services can continue uninterrupted for the current fiscal period.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding PR25-0064 appears to be supportive among council members and advocates for housing services. The urgency expressed in the discussions around the bill highlights a consensus on the critical nature of supportive housing in addressing homelessness and related social issues. Although the resolution itself may not evoke significant contention, the overall context reflects a broader commitment to enhancing the welfare of the community through such housing initiatives.

Contention

Notably, the resolution was categorized as an emergency declaration, underscoring the immediate necessity for funding approval. This classification could lead to discussions regarding the appropriateness of emergency measures for financial adjustments, especially as they relate to taxpayer resources and the long-term stability of housing services. However, there were no overt opposition remarks found in the voting history, suggesting a unified stance on the vital necessity of these support services.