District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill PR25-0415

Introduced
9/19/23  
Refer
10/3/23  
Introduced
9/19/23  
Report Pass
11/2/23  
Refer
10/3/23  
Passed
11/7/23  
Report Pass
11/2/23  

Caption

Board of Optometry Dr. Gregory D. Foley Confirmation Resolution of 2023

Impact

The resolution does not directly amend existing statutes or impose new regulations; rather, it solidifies the appointment of a qualified individual to an important oversight body. The presence of adequately qualified board members is crucial for maintaining the standards of optometric practice in D.C., as the Board of Optometry is responsible for overseeing the licensure and regulation of optometrists within the district. By ensuring competent members on such boards, the resolution contributes indirectly to the public's trust in health service provisions.

Summary

PR25-0415, known as the Board of Optometry Dr. Gregory D. Foley Confirmation Resolution of 2023, serves to confirm the appointment of Dr. Gregory D. Foley to the Board of Optometry in the District of Columbia. This resolution underscores the process of appointing qualified professionals to regulatory boards that oversee health occupations, ensuring that the members possess the necessary credentials and expertise. Dr. Foley, who is an optometrist licensed in the District, replaces Dr. Jeffrey Kraskin for the remainder of a term ending on November 10, 2024.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding PR25-0415 is positive, reflecting a consensus on the importance of appointing qualified professionals to health boards. The unanimous voting outcome of 13 yeas and 0 nays indicates strong support among council members for Dr. Foley's confirmation. This suggests that legislators value the expertise that Dr. Foley brings and recognize the significance of having competent oversight in healthcare professions.

Contention

While PR25-0415 reflects an agreement on confirming a suitable candidate, discussions surrounding appointments to regulatory boards often can display contention, particularly around issues such as transparency and the qualifications of nominees. However, in this instance, the straightforward nature of the resolution and the lack of dissenting votes indicate that there were no major points of contention among council members regarding Dr. Foley's eligibility or the need for his confirmation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.