11 | | - | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
| 34 | + | (c) There is no BRL shown in the District’s survey database on SurDocs and there is no 23 |
---|
| 35 | + | shown in the ALTA survey prepared for the District in December 2014. The homes, as currently 24 |
---|
| 36 | + | designed, extend five feet beyond the BRL in question and feature porches which extend an 25 |
---|
| 37 | + | additional five feet beyond the BRL in question and feature porches which extend an additional 26 |
---|
| 38 | + | five feet six inches. They cannot be constructed as designed and approved by HPRB and ANC 27 |
---|
| 39 | + | 4A without removal or the reduction of the BRL to 9.5’. 28 |
---|
| 40 | + | (d) The Project design received unanimous approval from the Historic Preservation 29 |
---|
| 41 | + | Review Board on February 24, 2022 after a months-long community engagement process that 30 |
---|
| 42 | + | resulted in revisions to the plans prior to approval. The front yards and front porches along Fern 31 |
---|
| 43 | + | Street were key design elements including a few follow up revisions that were addressed in the 32 |
---|
| 44 | + | March 2022 HPRB resubmission package. 33 |
---|
| 45 | + | (e) Phase I of the land development, which accounts for 38% of all units, has been 34 |
---|
| 46 | + | completed by the Master Developer on the basis of plans there were permitted and approved by 35 |
---|
| 47 | + | the Department of Buildings, Department of Energy and Environment, DC Water, Pepco, and 36 |
---|
| 48 | + | Washington Gas. The site has been graded and new facilities have been installed over the past 37 |
---|
| 49 | + | year at a substantial investment. 38 |
---|
| 50 | + | (f) In parallel to the land development work being completed by Master Developer, Toll 39 |
---|
| 51 | + | Brothers, has advanced its design documents. It submitted its permit set for “Building 12” and 40 |
---|
| 52 | + | “Building 13” to DOB, which make up two of six impacted buildings along Fern Street NW. 41 |
---|
| 53 | + | Upon permit approval, Toll Brothers plans to commence construction this year. 42 |
---|
| 54 | + | (g) Toll Brothers, with its civil engineer, applied for a District Department of 43 |
---|
| 55 | + | Transportation construction permit for stairs and leadwalks in Public Space along Fern Street 44 |
---|
| 56 | + | NW. Chris Shaheen with the Office of Planning issued the following comment: 45 3 |
---|
13 | | - | December 5, 2023 |
---|
| 58 | + | Office of the Surveyor records show there is a 15' building restriction line on Fern 46 |
---|
| 59 | + | Street that is not indicated on site plans submitted with this application. Revise 47 |
---|
| 60 | + | plans and application to include the building restriction line and include all work 48 |
---|
| 61 | + | in this area as part of the public space permit OR provide documentation showing 49 |
---|
| 62 | + | that the building restriction line has been removed. 50 |
---|
| 63 | + | 51 |
---|
| 64 | + | Chris Shaheen directed Toll Brothers and the civil engineer to a survey from 1972 52 |
---|
| 65 | + | indicating a 15’ BRL on the south side of Fern Street NW between Georgia Avenue NW and 53 |
---|
| 66 | + | Alaska Avenue NW. 54 |
---|
| 67 | + | (h) The Master Developer consulted with the Office of the Surveyor as to whether there 55 |
---|
| 68 | + | was a Building Restriction Line given the ALTA survey and SURDocs maps upon which they 56 |
---|
| 69 | + | relied did not show it.The Surveyor indicated that, in his opinion, when the District created a 57 |
---|
| 70 | + | new parcel to convey the Walter Reed campus from the US Army to the District, the BRL was 58 |
---|
| 71 | + | likely eliminated consistent with several other BRLs nearby. However, the documents pursuant 59 |
---|
| 72 | + | to the parcel creation were not specific as to the elimination of the BRL. As a result, the surveyor 60 |
---|
| 73 | + | advised that the BRL would need to be removed or reduced by the District for the project to 61 |
---|
| 74 | + | move forward as approved. 62 |
---|
| 75 | + | (i) Toll Brothers’ townhomes are designed such that the face of the house is ten feet back 63 |
---|
| 76 | + | from the property line, meaning 5 feet of the townhomes are within the BRL. 64 |
---|
| 77 | + | As indicated previously, the BRL did not show up in the ALTA survey that AMT 65 |
---|
| 78 | + | prepared for the District in December 2014. Additionally, when searched on SurDocs, no such 66 |
---|
| 79 | + | BRL is shown on the south side of Fern Street NW. 67 |
---|
| 80 | + | (j) There are no public utilities within the fifteen foot BRL, which is also within the 68 |
---|
| 81 | + | fenceline of the former Army Medical Center campus that would be impacted by removal and 69 |
---|
| 82 | + | and no public purpose served by retention of the BRL. 70 4 |
---|
15 | | - | |
---|
16 | | - | To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to reduce the building |
---|
17 | | - | restriction line along the southern side of Fern Street, NW, on Lots 847, 973, 1016 to |
---|
18 | | - | 1033, and 1062 to 1072 in Square 2950 from 15 feet to 9.5 feet. |
---|
19 | | - | RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this |
---|
20 | | - | resolution may be cited as the “Adjustment of Building Restriction Line in Square 2950 along |
---|
21 | | - | the southern side of Fern Street, NW, S.O. 23-06301 Emergency Declaration Resolution of |
---|
22 | | - | 2023”. |
---|
23 | | - | |
---|
24 | | - | Sec. 2. (a) The redevelopment of the former Walter Reed Army Medical Center campus, |
---|
25 | | - | the Parks at Walter Reed, includes the development of 141 townhomes and stacked townhome |
---|
26 | | - | flats fronting the south side of Fern Street NW on Parcels A-G of the Master Plan, called |
---|
27 | | - | Veranda at the Parks (“Project”). |
---|
28 | | - | (b) The Project has been fully designed and infrastructure serving the townhomes was |
---|
29 | | - | installed with the understanding that there was no building restriction line along the south side of |
---|
30 | | - | Fern Street, NW. |
---|
31 | | - | (c) There is no building restriction line shown in the District’s survey database on |
---|
32 | | - | SurDocs or in the ALTA survey prepared for the District in December 2014. The homes, as |
---|
33 | | - | currently designed, extend 5 feet beyond the building restriction line and feature porches, which |
---|
34 | | - | extend an additional 5 feet 6 inches. They cannot be constructed as designed and approved by the |
---|
35 | | - | Historic Preservation Review Board (“HPRB”) and ANC 4A without removal or the reduction of |
---|
36 | | - | the building restriction line to 9.5 feet . |
---|
37 | | - | (d) The Project design received unanimous approval from the HPRB on February 24, |
---|
38 | | - | 2022, after a months-long community engagement process that resulted in revisions to the plans |
---|
39 | | - | prior to approval. The front yards and front porches along Fern Street were key design elements, |
---|
40 | | - | including a few follow up revisions that were addressed in the March 2022 HPRB resubmission |
---|
41 | | - | package. |
---|
42 | | - | (e) Phase I of the land development, which accounts for 38% of all units, has been |
---|
43 | | - | completed by the Master Developer on the basis of plans there were permitted and approved by |
---|
44 | | - | the Department of Buildings (“DOB”) , Department of Energy and Environment, Water and ENROLLED ORIGINAL |
---|
45 | | - | |
---|
46 | | - | |
---|
47 | | - | |
---|
48 | | - | |
---|
49 | | - | 2 |
---|
50 | | - | |
---|
51 | | - | Sewer Authority, Pepco, and Washington Gas. The site has been graded and new facilities have |
---|
52 | | - | been installed over the past year at a substantial investment. |
---|
53 | | - | (f) In parallel to the land development work being completed by the Master Developer, |
---|
54 | | - | Toll Brothers has advanced its design documents. It submitted its permit set for Building 12 and |
---|
55 | | - | Building 13 to DOB, which make up 2 of 6 impacted buildings along Fern Street , NW. Upon |
---|
56 | | - | permit approval, Toll Brothers plans to commence construction this year. |
---|
57 | | - | (g) Toll Brothers, with its civil engineer, applied for a District Department of |
---|
58 | | - | Transportation construction permit for stairs and leadwalks in Public Space along Fern Street, |
---|
59 | | - | NW. Chris Shaheen with the Office of Planning issued the following comment: |
---|
60 | | - | “Office of the Surveyor records show there is a 15' building restriction line on Fern |
---|
61 | | - | Street that is not indicated on site plans submitted with this application. Revise |
---|
62 | | - | plans and application to include the building restriction line and include all work |
---|
63 | | - | in this area as part of the public space permit OR provide documentation showing |
---|
64 | | - | that the building restriction line has been removed.”. |
---|
65 | | - | |
---|
66 | | - | Chris Shaheen directed Toll Brothers and the civil engineer to a survey from 1972 |
---|
67 | | - | indicating a 15’ BRL on the south side of Fern Street , NW between Georgia Avenue, NW and |
---|
68 | | - | Alaska Avenue, NW . |
---|
69 | | - | (h) The Master Developer consulted with the Office of the Surveyor as to whether there |
---|
70 | | - | was a building restriction line given the ALTA survey and SURDocs maps upon which they |
---|
71 | | - | relied did not show it.The Surveyor indicated that, in his opinion, when the District created a |
---|
72 | | - | new parcel to convey the Walter Reed campus from the US Army to the District, the building |
---|
73 | | - | restriction line was likely eliminated consistent with several other building restriction lines |
---|
74 | | - | nearby. However, the documents pursuant to the parcel creation were not specific as to its |
---|
75 | | - | elimination. As a result, the Surveyor advised that the building restriction line would need to be |
---|
76 | | - | removed or reduced by the District for the project to move forward as approved. |
---|
77 | | - | (i) Toll Brothers’ townhomes are designed such that the face of the house is 10 feet back |
---|
78 | | - | from the property line, meaning 5 feet of the townhomes are within the BRL. As indicated |
---|
79 | | - | previously, the BRL did not show up in the ALTA survey that AMT prepared for the District in |
---|
80 | | - | December 2014. Additionally, when searched on SurDocs, no such BRL is shown on the south |
---|
81 | | - | side of Fern Street NW. |
---|
82 | | - | (j) There are no public utilities within the 15- foot building restriction linewhich is also |
---|
83 | | - | within the fenceline of the former Army Medical Center campus, which would be impacted by |
---|
84 | | - | removal. |
---|
85 | | - | (k) TPWR Developer and Toll Brothers are seeking the removal of the 15 -foot building |
---|
86 | | - | restriction line and the establishment of a 9.5- foot building restriction line so that the only |
---|
87 | | - | projection are the stairs and porch. Both parties have invested years of effort and significant |
---|
88 | | - | expense to advance the land development and design of the Project. TPWR Developer and Toll |
---|
89 | | - | Brothers deployed this capital based on assumed credible surveys. The Project will deliver much- ENROLLED ORIGINAL |
---|
90 | | - | |
---|
91 | | - | |
---|
92 | | - | |
---|
93 | | - | |
---|
94 | | - | 3 |
---|
95 | | - | |
---|
96 | | - | needed family sized homes with 3+ bedrooms, including 12 affordable units. The Master |
---|
97 | | - | Developer will have to repeat these protracted processes with an uncertain outcome in the event |
---|
98 | | - | that the building restriction line is not adjusted and the Project has to be redesigned. |
---|
99 | | - | (l) In conclusion, the Project is meritorious in providing new housing and affordable |
---|
100 | | - | housing, the Master Developer relied in good faith on the ALTA survey and SurDocs which did |
---|
101 | | - | not show the building restriction line and no public interest is served with the retention of the |
---|
102 | | - | building restriction line. |
---|
103 | | - | |
---|
104 | | - | Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute |
---|
105 | | - | emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Adjustment of Building Restriction Line |
---|
106 | | - | in Square 2950 along the southern side of Fern Street NW, S.O . 23-06301 Emergency Act be |
---|
107 | | - | adopted after a single reading. |
---|
108 | | - | |
---|
109 | | - | Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. |
---|
| 84 | + | (k) TPWR Developer and Toll Brothers are seeking the removal of a fifteen foot Building 71 |
---|
| 85 | + | Restriction Line on the south side of Fern Street NW between Alaska Avenue NW and George 72 |
---|
| 86 | + | Avenue NW and establishment of a 9.5 foot BRL so that the only projection are on the stairs and 73 |
---|
| 87 | + | porch. 74 |
---|
| 88 | + | Both parties have invested years of effort and significant expense to advance the land 75 |
---|
| 89 | + | development and design of the Project. TPWR Developer and Toll Brothers deployed this capital 76 |
---|
| 90 | + | based on assumed credible surveys. The Project will deliver much-needed family sized homes 77 |
---|
| 91 | + | with 3+ bedrooms, including 12 affordable. As mentioned above, the Project went thru an HPRB 78 |
---|
| 92 | + | approval process as well as a community design review process gaining support from ANC 4A, 79 |
---|
| 93 | + | whose constituents’ homes, including our former ANC 4A Commissioner, face the Project on 80 |
---|
| 94 | + | Fern Street. The Master Developer will have to repeat these protracted processes with an 81 |
---|
| 95 | + | uncertain outcome in the event that the BRL is not adjusted and the Project has to be redesigned 82 |
---|
| 96 | + | to accommodate the BRL. 83 |
---|
| 97 | + | (l) In conclusion, the Project is meritorious in providing new housing and affordable 84 |
---|
| 98 | + | housing, the Master Developer relied in good faith on the ALTA survey and SurDocs which did 85 |
---|
| 99 | + | not show the BRL and no public interest is served with the retention of the BRL. 86 |
---|
| 100 | + | Sec. 3. The Council of the District of Columbia determines that the circumstances 87 |
---|
| 101 | + | enumerated in section 2 constitute emergency circumstances making it necessary that the 88 |
---|
| 102 | + | Adjustment of Building Restriction Line in Square 2950 along the southern side of Fern Street 89 |
---|
| 103 | + | NW, S.R. 23-06301 be adopted after a single reading. 90 |
---|
| 104 | + | Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. 91 |
---|