COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER BROOKE PINTO
THE JOHN A. WILSON BUILDING
1350 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 106
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004
January 30, 2025
Nyasha Smith, Secretary
Council of the District of Columbia
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Dear Secretary Smith,
Today, I, along with Chairman Mendelson and Councilmembers Charles Allen, Christina
Henderson, Zachary Parker, Janeese Lewis George, Robert C. White, Anita Bonds, Brianne
Nadeau, Matthew Frumin, and Wendell Felder, am introducing the “Removing Barriers and
Reducing Stigma to Encourage HIV Prevention Amendment Act of 2025.” Please find enclosed a
signed copy of the legislation.
This legislation would encourage uptake of the prescribed use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (an
HIV prevention medication commonly called PrEP) and reduce the stigma associated with HIV
and HIV prevention medication by prohibiting insurers from factoring the use of PrEP in decisions
related to the issuance of disability, life, or long-term care insurance policies. If insurers are
permitted to discriminate against those who use PrEP, it may dissuade enrollees from using
PrEP, thus frustrating the District’s HIV prevention strategy and negatively impacting
public health.
PrEP, either a once-daily pill under the brand names Truvada or Descovy or a bi-monthly injection
under the brand name Apretude, reduces the risk of contracting HIV from sex by more than 90%
and by more than 70% among people who inject drugs when used as directed. When paired with
condoms, the risk of contracting HIV from sex while using PrEP is even lower. PrEP is a vital tool
to meet the District’s goal to reduce annual new HIV diagnoses to fewer than 130 by 2030. In
2019, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which makes recommendations about
preventive care, recommended that clinicians offer PrEP to all individuals at high risk for HIV.
Although treatable, HIV is a chronic, incurable condition and can have significant health
consequences, particularly when left untreated. Consistent with the recommendations of the
USPSTF, the District should enact policies that encourage those at risk for HIV to have access to
PrEP.
Over the last few years, insurance commissioners in states such as New York and California have
uncovered evidence that life, disability, and long- term care insurance companies denied or limited
coverage or charged higher premiums to HIV-negative individuals who use PrEP. In 2019, the
Massachusetts Attorney General settled a lawsuit against an insurer after alleging that it
discriminated against applicants for life and long-term care insurance based on those applicants’
use of PrEP. And in 2019, Representative Adam Schiff (D-California) introduced legislation that
would ban such discrimination on the federal level. Although companies in the states with evidence
of discrimination have agreed to end such practices, and no such evidence of discrimination has
been documented in the District, by passing this legislation, the Council will put insurance
companies on clear notice that such practices will not be tolerated in the District, run
contrary to our HIV prevention strategy, and are against our values of equity and fair
treatment.
I previously introduced an identical version of this legislation in Council Period 25, B25- 352.
Should you have any questions about this legislation, please contact my Legislative and Committee
Director, Linn Groft, at lgroft@dccouncil.gov.
Thank you,
Brooke Pinto Ward 2 Councilmember
___________________________________ ___________________________________ 1
Chairman Phil Mendelson Councilmember Brooke Pinto 2
3
4
___________________________________ ___________________________________ 5
Councilmember Christina Henderson Councilmember Charles Allen 6
7
8
___________________________________ ___________________________________ 9
Councilmember Janeese Lewis George Councilmember Zachary Parker 10
11
12
________________________ ___________________________________ 13
Councilmember Robert C. White, Jr. Councilmember Brianne K. Nadeau 14
15
16
___________________________________ ___________________________________ 17
Councilmember Anita Bonds Councilmember Matthew Frumin 18
19
20
21
_____________________________ 22
Councilmember Wendell Felder 23
24
25
A BILL 26
27
_______ 28
29
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 30
31
________ 32
33
34
To amend the Prohibition of Discrimination in the Provision of Insurance Act of 1986 to prohibit 35
insurance companies from factoring the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in decisions 36
related to the issuance of disability, life, or long- term care insurance policies in order to 37
ensure discrimination doesn’t inhibit the use or uptake of preventive medication for HIV 38
and to reduce the stigma associated with HIV and HIV preventive medications. 39
40
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 41
act may be cited as the “Removing Barriers and Reducing Stigma to Encourage HIV Prevention 42
Amendment Act of 2025 ”. 43 2
Sec. 2. The Prohibition of Discrimination in the Provision of Insurance Act of 1986, 44
effective August 7, 1986 (D.C. Law 6- 132; D.C. Official Code § 31- 1601 et seq.), is amended as 45
follows: 46
(a) Section 2 (D.C. Official Code § 31- 1601) is amended by adding a new paragraph (8) 47
to read as follows: 48
“(8) “Pre- exposure Prophylaxis” includes daily oral antiretroviral medication, 49
which has either a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine or 50
a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir alafenamide and emtricitabine, and extended- release 51
injectable suspension antiretroviral medicatio n with active ingredient cabotegravir. 52
(b) A new section 12 (D.C. Official Code § 31- 1611) is added to read as follows: 53
“Sec. 12. Prohibition against discrimination in use of pre-exposure prophylaxis. 54
“(a) No life, disability income, or long- term care insurance policy or contract shall 55
contain any exclusion, reduction, or other limitation of benefits related to the use of pre-exposure 56
prophylaxis when taken pursuant to a valid prescriber’s order. 57
“(b) In reviewing an application for life, disability income, or long- term care 58
insurance, no insurer, or an agent, broker, or employee of the insurer shall factor the use of pre-59
exposure prophylaxis when taken pursuant to a valid prescriber’s order into a decision regarding: 60
“(1) whether to issue, renew, or cancel a policy; 61
“(2) the rates, premiums, dues, assessments, benefits covered, or expenses 62
reimbursable under the policy; or 63
“(3) The duration or terms of the policy. 64 3
“(c) In addition to the applicable penalties of section 9 of this chapter, an insurer, 65
or an agent, broker, or employee of the insurer shall be fined not less than $1,000, and not more 66
than $10,000 for each violation of this section. 67
Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 68
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 69
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 70
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1- 301.47a). 71
Sec. 4. Effective date. 72
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 73
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30- day period of congressional review as 74
provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 75
24, 1973 (87 Stat. 788; D.C. Official Code § 1- 206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 76
Columbia Register. 77