1 | 1 | | |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
4 | 4 | | OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER BROOKE PINTO |
---|
5 | 5 | | THE JOHN A. WILSON BUILDING |
---|
6 | 6 | | 1350 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 106 |
---|
7 | 7 | | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004 |
---|
8 | 8 | | |
---|
9 | 9 | | |
---|
10 | 10 | | |
---|
11 | 11 | | |
---|
12 | 12 | | January 30, 2025 |
---|
13 | 13 | | |
---|
14 | 14 | | Nyasha Smith, Secretary |
---|
15 | 15 | | Council of the District of Columbia |
---|
16 | 16 | | 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. |
---|
17 | 17 | | Washington, DC 20004 |
---|
18 | 18 | | |
---|
19 | 19 | | Dear Secretary Smith, |
---|
20 | 20 | | |
---|
21 | 21 | | Today, I, along with Chairman Mendelson and Councilmembers Charles Allen, Christina |
---|
22 | 22 | | Henderson, Zachary Parker, Janeese Lewis George, Robert C. White, Anita Bonds, Brianne |
---|
23 | 23 | | Nadeau, Matthew Frumin, and Wendell Felder, am introducing the “Removing Barriers and |
---|
24 | 24 | | Reducing Stigma to Encourage HIV Prevention Amendment Act of 2025.” Please find enclosed a |
---|
25 | 25 | | signed copy of the legislation. |
---|
26 | 26 | | |
---|
27 | 27 | | This legislation would encourage uptake of the prescribed use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (an |
---|
28 | 28 | | HIV prevention medication commonly called PrEP) and reduce the stigma associated with HIV |
---|
29 | 29 | | and HIV prevention medication by prohibiting insurers from factoring the use of PrEP in decisions |
---|
30 | 30 | | related to the issuance of disability, life, or long-term care insurance policies. If insurers are |
---|
31 | 31 | | permitted to discriminate against those who use PrEP, it may dissuade enrollees from using |
---|
32 | 32 | | PrEP, thus frustrating the District’s HIV prevention strategy and negatively impacting |
---|
33 | 33 | | public health. |
---|
34 | 34 | | |
---|
35 | 35 | | PrEP, either a once-daily pill under the brand names Truvada or Descovy or a bi-monthly injection |
---|
36 | 36 | | under the brand name Apretude, reduces the risk of contracting HIV from sex by more than 90% |
---|
37 | 37 | | and by more than 70% among people who inject drugs when used as directed. When paired with |
---|
38 | 38 | | condoms, the risk of contracting HIV from sex while using PrEP is even lower. PrEP is a vital tool |
---|
39 | 39 | | to meet the District’s goal to reduce annual new HIV diagnoses to fewer than 130 by 2030. In |
---|
40 | 40 | | 2019, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which makes recommendations about |
---|
41 | 41 | | preventive care, recommended that clinicians offer PrEP to all individuals at high risk for HIV. |
---|
42 | 42 | | Although treatable, HIV is a chronic, incurable condition and can have significant health |
---|
43 | 43 | | consequences, particularly when left untreated. Consistent with the recommendations of the |
---|
44 | 44 | | USPSTF, the District should enact policies that encourage those at risk for HIV to have access to |
---|
45 | 45 | | PrEP. |
---|
46 | 46 | | |
---|
47 | 47 | | Over the last few years, insurance commissioners in states such as New York and California have |
---|
48 | 48 | | uncovered evidence that life, disability, and long- term care insurance companies denied or limited |
---|
49 | 49 | | coverage or charged higher premiums to HIV-negative individuals who use PrEP. In 2019, the |
---|
50 | 50 | | |
---|
51 | 51 | | |
---|
52 | 52 | | |
---|
53 | 53 | | Massachusetts Attorney General settled a lawsuit against an insurer after alleging that it |
---|
54 | 54 | | discriminated against applicants for life and long-term care insurance based on those applicants’ |
---|
55 | 55 | | use of PrEP. And in 2019, Representative Adam Schiff (D-California) introduced legislation that |
---|
56 | 56 | | would ban such discrimination on the federal level. Although companies in the states with evidence |
---|
57 | 57 | | of discrimination have agreed to end such practices, and no such evidence of discrimination has |
---|
58 | 58 | | been documented in the District, by passing this legislation, the Council will put insurance |
---|
59 | 59 | | companies on clear notice that such practices will not be tolerated in the District, run |
---|
60 | 60 | | contrary to our HIV prevention strategy, and are against our values of equity and fair |
---|
61 | 61 | | treatment. |
---|
62 | 62 | | |
---|
63 | 63 | | I previously introduced an identical version of this legislation in Council Period 25, B25- 352. |
---|
64 | 64 | | Should you have any questions about this legislation, please contact my Legislative and Committee |
---|
65 | 65 | | Director, Linn Groft, at lgroft@dccouncil.gov. |
---|
66 | 66 | | Thank you, |
---|
67 | 67 | | Brooke Pinto Ward 2 Councilmember |
---|
68 | 68 | | |
---|
69 | 69 | | ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 1 |
---|
70 | 70 | | Chairman Phil Mendelson Councilmember Brooke Pinto 2 |
---|
71 | 71 | | 3 |
---|
72 | 72 | | 4 |
---|
73 | 73 | | ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 5 |
---|
74 | 74 | | Councilmember Christina Henderson Councilmember Charles Allen 6 |
---|
75 | 75 | | 7 |
---|
76 | 76 | | 8 |
---|
77 | 77 | | ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 9 |
---|
78 | 78 | | Councilmember Janeese Lewis George Councilmember Zachary Parker 10 |
---|
79 | 79 | | 11 |
---|
80 | 80 | | 12 |
---|
81 | 81 | | ________________________ ___________________________________ 13 |
---|
82 | 82 | | Councilmember Robert C. White, Jr. Councilmember Brianne K. Nadeau 14 |
---|
83 | 83 | | 15 |
---|
84 | 84 | | 16 |
---|
85 | 85 | | ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 17 |
---|
86 | 86 | | Councilmember Anita Bonds Councilmember Matthew Frumin 18 |
---|
87 | 87 | | 19 |
---|
88 | 88 | | 20 |
---|
89 | 89 | | 21 |
---|
90 | 90 | | |
---|
91 | 91 | | _____________________________ 22 |
---|
92 | 92 | | |
---|
93 | 93 | | Councilmember Wendell Felder 23 |
---|
94 | 94 | | 24 |
---|
95 | 95 | | 25 |
---|
96 | 96 | | A BILL 26 |
---|
97 | 97 | | 27 |
---|
98 | 98 | | _______ 28 |
---|
99 | 99 | | 29 |
---|
100 | 100 | | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 30 |
---|
101 | 101 | | 31 |
---|
102 | 102 | | ________ 32 |
---|
103 | 103 | | 33 |
---|
104 | 104 | | 34 |
---|
105 | 105 | | To amend the Prohibition of Discrimination in the Provision of Insurance Act of 1986 to prohibit 35 |
---|
106 | 106 | | insurance companies from factoring the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in decisions 36 |
---|
107 | 107 | | related to the issuance of disability, life, or long- term care insurance policies in order to 37 |
---|
108 | 108 | | ensure discrimination doesn’t inhibit the use or uptake of preventive medication for HIV 38 |
---|
109 | 109 | | and to reduce the stigma associated with HIV and HIV preventive medications. 39 |
---|
110 | 110 | | 40 |
---|
111 | 111 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 41 |
---|
112 | 112 | | act may be cited as the “Removing Barriers and Reducing Stigma to Encourage HIV Prevention 42 |
---|
113 | 113 | | Amendment Act of 2025 ”. 43 2 |
---|
114 | 114 | | |
---|
115 | 115 | | Sec. 2. The Prohibition of Discrimination in the Provision of Insurance Act of 1986, 44 |
---|
116 | 116 | | effective August 7, 1986 (D.C. Law 6- 132; D.C. Official Code § 31- 1601 et seq.), is amended as 45 |
---|
117 | 117 | | follows: 46 |
---|
118 | 118 | | (a) Section 2 (D.C. Official Code § 31- 1601) is amended by adding a new paragraph (8) 47 |
---|
119 | 119 | | to read as follows: 48 |
---|
120 | 120 | | “(8) “Pre- exposure Prophylaxis” includes daily oral antiretroviral medication, 49 |
---|
121 | 121 | | which has either a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine or 50 |
---|
122 | 122 | | a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir alafenamide and emtricitabine, and extended- release 51 |
---|
123 | 123 | | injectable suspension antiretroviral medicatio n with active ingredient cabotegravir. 52 |
---|
124 | 124 | | (b) A new section 12 (D.C. Official Code § 31- 1611) is added to read as follows: 53 |
---|
125 | 125 | | “Sec. 12. Prohibition against discrimination in use of pre-exposure prophylaxis. 54 |
---|
126 | 126 | | “(a) No life, disability income, or long- term care insurance policy or contract shall 55 |
---|
127 | 127 | | contain any exclusion, reduction, or other limitation of benefits related to the use of pre-exposure 56 |
---|
128 | 128 | | prophylaxis when taken pursuant to a valid prescriber’s order. 57 |
---|
129 | 129 | | “(b) In reviewing an application for life, disability income, or long- term care 58 |
---|
130 | 130 | | insurance, no insurer, or an agent, broker, or employee of the insurer shall factor the use of pre-59 |
---|
131 | 131 | | exposure prophylaxis when taken pursuant to a valid prescriber’s order into a decision regarding: 60 |
---|
132 | 132 | | “(1) whether to issue, renew, or cancel a policy; 61 |
---|
133 | 133 | | “(2) the rates, premiums, dues, assessments, benefits covered, or expenses 62 |
---|
134 | 134 | | reimbursable under the policy; or 63 |
---|
135 | 135 | | “(3) The duration or terms of the policy. 64 3 |
---|
136 | 136 | | |
---|
137 | 137 | | “(c) In addition to the applicable penalties of section 9 of this chapter, an insurer, 65 |
---|
138 | 138 | | or an agent, broker, or employee of the insurer shall be fined not less than $1,000, and not more 66 |
---|
139 | 139 | | than $10,000 for each violation of this section. 67 |
---|
140 | 140 | | Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 68 |
---|
141 | 141 | | The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 69 |
---|
142 | 142 | | impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 70 |
---|
143 | 143 | | approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1- 301.47a). 71 |
---|
144 | 144 | | Sec. 4. Effective date. 72 |
---|
145 | 145 | | This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 73 |
---|
146 | 146 | | Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30- day period of congressional review as 74 |
---|
147 | 147 | | provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 75 |
---|
148 | 148 | | 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 788; D.C. Official Code § 1- 206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 76 |
---|
149 | 149 | | Columbia Register. 77 |
---|