1 | 1 | | |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | |
---|
4 | 4 | | |
---|
5 | 5 | | COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
6 | 6 | | OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER BROOKE PINTO |
---|
7 | 7 | | THE JOHN A. WILSON BUILDING |
---|
8 | 8 | | 1350 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 106 |
---|
9 | 9 | | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004 |
---|
10 | 10 | | February 4, 2025 |
---|
11 | 11 | | Nyasha Smith, Secretary |
---|
12 | 12 | | Council of the District of Columbia |
---|
13 | 13 | | 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. |
---|
14 | 14 | | Washington, DC 20004 |
---|
15 | 15 | | |
---|
16 | 16 | | Dear Secretary Smith, |
---|
17 | 17 | | |
---|
18 | 18 | | Today, Councilmember Matthew Frumin and I, along with Councilmember Christina Henderson, are |
---|
19 | 19 | | introducing the “Fair Taxation of Municipal Bonds Amendment Act of 2025.” This bill would exclude from |
---|
20 | 20 | | taxation out-of-state municipal bonds acquired prior to January 1, 2025. I previously introduced an identical |
---|
21 | 21 | | version of this legislation in Council Period 25, B25 -0965.. |
---|
22 | 22 | | Municipal bonds are a key investment tool used in retirement planning because they promise a modest but |
---|
23 | 23 | | stable return for a secure future. Income from out -of-state municipal bond interest has always been exempt |
---|
24 | 24 | | from District taxes, and so many retirees planned for retirement with this understanding in mind. However, the |
---|
25 | 25 | | enactment of the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Support Act of 2024 (“FY25 BSA”) brings a drastic change to those |
---|
26 | 26 | | plans: all interest earned on out-of-state municipal bonds starting on January 1, 2025, will be subject to taxation |
---|
27 | 27 | | in the District. While t his change attempted to bring the District in line with many other states on how |
---|
28 | 28 | | municipal bonds are taxed, it failed to protect the careful planning of many residents, including many of our |
---|
29 | 29 | | seniors. |
---|
30 | 30 | | |
---|
31 | 31 | | Prior to enacting the FY25 BSA, the Council heard numerous concerns from constituents about the impact this |
---|
32 | 32 | | change would have on retirees who are living on fixed incomes reliant on municipal bond interest. Our |
---|
33 | 33 | | constituents urged the Council to maintain the tax exemption for bonds that were currently held and had been |
---|
34 | 34 | | purchased with a good- faith belief and understanding that the bond interest would not be taxed. |
---|
35 | 35 | | |
---|
36 | 36 | | A handful of other states, including Utah, similarly removed a tax exemption for out-of-state bonds but |
---|
37 | 37 | | maintained the exemption for bonds that had been acquired prior to this change. We heard some concerns about |
---|
38 | 38 | | the feasibility of differentiating how bond interest is taxed based on the bond acquisition date. However, recent |
---|
39 | 39 | | conversations with representatives from the Utah State Tax Commission, which implements Utah’s tax laws, |
---|
40 | 40 | | revealed that these fears were overblown; Utah reported no major issues implementing their law or confusion |
---|
41 | 41 | | from bondholders in identifying the acquisition dates of their bonds. |
---|
42 | 42 | | |
---|
43 | 43 | | Since the Council passed the FY 2025 budget, my office has continued to hear from retirees on fixed incomes |
---|
44 | 44 | | with serious concerns about the impact that taxing currently held bonds will have on their livelihood. Tax due |
---|
45 | 45 | | on out-of-state bonds will not be paid by taxpayers until spring 2026, when 2025 taxes are filed. As a result, |
---|
46 | 46 | | there remains a short window of time in which the Council may pass this protection into law and protect a |
---|
47 | 47 | | stable financial future for our seniors who are impacted. |
---|
48 | 48 | | Should you have any questions about this legislation, please contact my Legislative Director, Linn Groft, at |
---|
49 | 49 | | lgroft@dccouncil.gov. Thank you. |
---|
50 | 50 | | |
---|
51 | 51 | | Best, |
---|
52 | 52 | | |
---|
53 | 53 | | Brooke Pinto |
---|
54 | 54 | | 1 |
---|
55 | 55 | | _____________________________ _____________________________ |
---|
56 | 56 | | Councilmember Matthew Frumin Councilmember Brooke Pinto |
---|
57 | 57 | | |
---|
58 | 58 | | |
---|
59 | 59 | | _____________________________ |
---|
60 | 60 | | Councilmember Christina Henderson |
---|
61 | 61 | | |
---|
62 | 62 | | |
---|
63 | 63 | | A BILL |
---|
64 | 64 | | |
---|
65 | 65 | | _________________________ |
---|
66 | 66 | | |
---|
67 | 67 | | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
68 | 68 | | |
---|
69 | 69 | | _________________________ |
---|
70 | 70 | | |
---|
71 | 71 | | |
---|
72 | 72 | | To amend Chapter 18 of Title 47 of the District of Columbia Official Code to maintain the tax 1 |
---|
73 | 73 | | exemption for out-of-state municipal bonds acquired prior to October 1, 2024. 2 |
---|
74 | 74 | | 3 |
---|
75 | 75 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may 4 |
---|
76 | 76 | | be cited as the “Fair Taxation of Municipal Bonds Amendment Act of 202 5”. 5 |
---|
77 | 77 | | Sec. 2. Section 47- 1803.02(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended by 6 |
---|
78 | 78 | | adding a new sub- subparagraph (III) to read as follows: 7 |
---|
79 | 79 | | “(III) Shall not, and shall not have been required to, include 8 |
---|
80 | 80 | | interest on the obligations of a state, a territory of the United States, or any political subdivision 9 |
---|
81 | 81 | | thereof acquired by the taxpayer before January 1, 2025, in the computation of District gross 10 |
---|
82 | 82 | | income.” 11 |
---|
83 | 83 | | Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement. 12 |
---|
84 | 84 | | The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal 13 |
---|
85 | 85 | | impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, 14 |
---|
86 | 86 | | approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1- 301.47a). 15 |
---|
87 | 87 | | Sec. 4. Effective date. 16 |
---|
88 | 88 | | 2 |
---|
89 | 89 | | This act shall take effect after approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the 17 |
---|
90 | 90 | | Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30- day period of congressional review as 18 |
---|
91 | 91 | | provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 19 |
---|
92 | 92 | | 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1- 206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of 20 |
---|
93 | 93 | | Columbia Register. 21 |
---|