District Of Columbia Council Bill B26-0214

District Of Columbia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/25
• Enrolled: 4/7/25
• Passed: 4/22/25

Caption

Modification Nos. 15, 16, 17, 17a, 17b, 17c, and 18 to Contract No. CW98887 with Great American Corporation Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2025

Impact

The bill is positioned to streamline procurement processes and maintain ongoing operations related to the services provided by Great American Corporation. By authorizing these modifications on an emergency basis, it reinforces the necessity for effective management and financial oversight pertaining to government contracts. This act serves to facilitate quick responses to immediate needs while circumventing the more extended procedures typically associated with procurement legislation.

Summary

B26-0214, known as the Modification Nos. 15, 16, 17, 17a, 17b, 17c, and 18 to Contract No. CW98887 with Great American Corporation Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2025, aims to approve several modifications to an existing contract with Great American Corporation. This contract involves various goods and services, with the bill specifically authorizing payment up to the amount of $4,841,171.40 for those services. The bill is presented as an emergency measure, indicating the council's urgency in addressing the matter promptly to ensure continuity in services provided under this contract.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding B26-0214 appears to be straightforward, with a strong emphasis on efficiency and responsiveness in government operations. There is no recorded opposition in the voting history, which demonstrates a shared understanding among council members regarding the importance of ensuring that contracts like the one in question do not lapse or hinder essential services. Legislators likely viewed the passage of this bill as a collective responsibility to uphold public service delivery.

Contention

While there were no notable points of contention documented in the discussions or voting history, it's important to recognize that the use of emergency acts can sometimes raise concerns regarding transparency and public scrutiny. However, in this case, the unanimous support (12 yeas, 0 nays) suggests that the need for immediate action outweighed any potential concerns, pointing to a consensus that swift approval was essential for operational continuity.