An Act To Amend Titles 7 And 17 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Expedited Review Of Development-related Permit Applications.
Impact
The introduction of HB101 is expected to have a considerable impact on state laws regulating development, particularly by altering rules surrounding permitting for construction and environmental plans. By allowing pre-approved private consultants to conduct reviews, the bill enables developers to move through the approval process faster, potentially resulting in expedited construction timelines. Furthermore, this measure is aimed at streamlining the regulatory framework governing land development and environmental review, which supporters argue will lead to enhanced economic activity within Delaware.
Summary
House Bill 101 aims to amend Titles 7 and 17 of the Delaware Code, facilitating an expedited review of development-related permit applications. The bill mandates the Department of Transportation (DelDOT) and the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) to establish a program designed to streamline the review process for 'entrance plans' and sediment and stormwater plans. Under this legislation, the expedited review must be completed within ten business days, significantly reducing the time traditionally required for these types of approvals and thereby encouraging quicker development processes within the state.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB101 appears to be supportive among business and development interests, who view the expedited review process as a necessary and beneficial reform. Proponents assert that these changes would alleviate bureaucratic delays that often hinder projects, thereby contributing to economic growth. However, there may be underlying concerns related to oversight and the quality of reviews conducted by private consultants, raising questions among some opponents regarding potential conflicts of interest and the adequacy of environmental protections.
Contention
Notably, there are points of contention regarding reliance on private consultants for the expedited review process. Critics may raise concerns about whether sufficient safeguards will be in place to prevent conflicts of interest, given that the costs for these consultants will be borne by developers themselves. This could lead to scenarios wherein the consultants prioritize developer interests over environmental or community concerns. As such, while the bill facilitates quicker development approvals, it necessitates careful scrutiny regarding its implementation to balance economic growth with environmental integrity.