An Act To Amend Title 21 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Motorcycle Rider Education Advisory Committee.
The bill outlines the specific responsibilities of the Committee, which includes monitoring the Motorcycle Rider Education Program, assessing its future needs, and recommending improvements. It also mandates that the Committee meets at least quarterly, providing a structured approach to gathering public input and legislative review related to motorcycle operation and education. As a result, the bill aims to strengthen the framework of motorcycle education in Delaware, potentially leading to enhanced rider safety and awareness on the roads.
House Bill 106 aims to amend Title 21 of the Delaware Code concerning the Motorcycle Rider Education Advisory Committee (Committee). Established in 1985, the Motorcycle Rider Education Program provides crucial training for new motorcycle operators, particularly for those under 18, by offering a mandatory novice training course alongside an optional refresher course for more experienced riders. This legislation seeks to formally codify the role and functions of the Committee, ensuring that it continues to serve the state’s motorcycle community effectively and aligns with the evolving needs of both riders and the broader public.
The general sentiment towards HB 106 appears to be positive, with broad support for the importance of motorcycle safety and education programs. Stakeholders recognize the necessity of having an organized advisory body that can continuously adapt and respond to the needs of motorcycle riders. However, there might be some concerns regarding how effectively the Committee can implement recommendations and whether it can secure the necessary support to fulfill its obligations adequately.
No notable points of contention were highlighted during discussions around the bill. The primary focus seems to be agreement on the need for structured motorcycle education and the value of the Committee. As the legislation progresses, it will be essential to monitor its implementation and assess whether the Committee can fulfill its expanded mandate effectively, especially in terms of public engagement and legislative review.