Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

Delaware House Bill HB47

Introduced
1/12/23  
Introduced
1/12/23  
Engrossed
4/4/23  
Refer
1/12/23  
Engrossed
4/4/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Passed
5/25/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 18 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Authorization Of Insurers And General Requirements.

Impact

The proposed changes will require insurers to maintain a higher level of financial resources, which is intended to enhance the overall stability and security of insurance companies operating within the state. These elevated requirements are designed to protect policyholders by ensuring that insurers are better equipped to handle claims and potential losses. This amendment aims to safeguard consumers and the integrity of the insurance market in Delaware, fostering confidence in the system.

Summary

House Bill 47 aims to amend Title 18 of the Delaware Code concerning the authorization of insurers and general requirements. The bill seeks to raise the minimum capital and surplus requirements necessary for insurers to operate in Delaware. This legislation addresses a long-standing issue as Delaware's capital requirements have been deemed among the lowest in the country for over fifty years. By increasing these requirements, the bill aligns Delaware's standards more closely with those of other jurisdictions, thereby promoting a more secure insurance market.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 47 appears to be largely supportive, especially among stakeholders prioritizing financial stability and consumer protection within the insurance sector. Proponents argue that stronger capital requirements will foster a healthier insurance climate by potentially reducing the risk of insolvency among insurers. However, a minority voice of concern exists from certain insurance providers who may face challenges in meeting the new financial thresholds, potentially perceiving it as an increased burden.

Contention

Notable points of contention hinge on the balance between regulatory oversight and the capacity of insurers to operate effectively under increased financial pressures. Some critics argue that while raising capital requirements is essential for consumer protection, it must be balanced against the operational feasibility for smaller or newer insurance companies, which might struggle to comply. The bill reflects a fundamental debate about the regulatory environment's role in ensuring industry stability without hindering competition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.